Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "AI could replace 100M jobs by 2035. Are you talking to DCs about “safe” majors?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Is the 100M jobs US only? We only have ~330M people in the country and a bunch of those are kids/elderly. Can only pay for a plumber, electrician, etc if one has money to pay for one. If things get tight, more people will DIY out of necessity. I have no doubt AI will change things substantially, particularly in certain industries. But I think it's hard to project how exactly work will change. Consider how many new jobs exist now that didn't just 20 years ago. I work in a space that didn't exist now made possible by technological advances in many different industries. I don't know that we can say AI won't do the same. I think students now should think of their education as preparing for a rapidly changing environment. Learning how to learn, Learning to synthesize inputs from a variety of sources, etc At a time when it seems there is a push toward 'job ready' today, there is a risk of missing out on laying a solid foundation for rapid change. Trades will be needed of course, but if that catches on, it will burn itself out like every other job/industry 'trend'. It gets saturated, pay drops, jobs getting harder to find. Rinse and repeat[/quote] I agee with this and also think the people that think trades won’t be affected are fooling themselves. You think they can’t develop an AI controlled robot to do plumbing work? Trades have already been affected by tech development and advances in manufacturing. AI might generate more work for historians and similar actually. Like people thought legal research tools would make legal work faster but it actually makes it slower because how you can find literally thousands of relevant cases that you have to think through (whereas old timey briefs would only cite a couple big cases). If AI can really summarize and reconstruct some of the very old historical records, that might give historians a whole fresh take on things to write about. They way DNA analysis is now opening up whole new avenues in archaeology. But I do feel like sooner or later the shite will hit the fan with all this. The world probably just needs fewer people. Which is probably okay in the long run.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics