Reply to D.C.'s "sanctuary city" status in question after webpage removed

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "D.C.'s "sanctuary city" status in question after webpage removed"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Bowser, bending the knee.

She needs to resign. [/quote]

+1.

I read the article and Bowser had the nerve to say this:

"It's misleading to suggest to anyone that if you're violating immigration laws, that this is a place where you can violate immigration laws," Bowser said. "You are vulnerable to federal immigration enforcement."

[/quote]

What exactly is wrong with this statement?[/quote]

What is wrong is that Bowser said and campaigned in supporting the opposite view:

"We are a sanctuary city because we know that our neighborhoods are safer and stronger when no one is afraid to call on our government for help, and when our police can focus on protecting and serving,” Bowser said in a statement last night. “The values, laws, and policies of Washington, D.C. did not change on Election Day. We celebrate our diversity and respect all D.C. residents no matter their immigration status.”

https://dcist.com/story/16/11/15/bowser-says-dc-remains-a-sanctuary/

That is not evolution. It is opportunism. A betrayal!

In Dante's Inferno, the Ninth Circle, the “lowest, blackest, and farthest from Heaven,” is reserved for the sin of treachery. The worst sinners, in his underworld, were the traitors—those who betrayed their loved ones, their country, and their God.

There is place in the Ninth Circle for Bowser.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics