Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Rigor and Absences: New Harvard Policy"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]A lot of ivy kids are rich. Straight up. Financial aid is provided for those with need, but others are full pay. So, rich kids from rich families being what they are, some are going to take time off to extend vacations or do things when they suit them. Academically, they'll usually be fine. But it's very disruptive. Obviously, the not-rich kids can't do this, and they largely worked hard to get there, so they're not skipping class or returning late from break because they're still in Zermatt or something. Requiring attendance was seen as anti-equity just a few years ago because people have obligations and disabilities that are invisible, but it can certainly go the other way. But as the rich vs. poor divide increases there's a lot more "above the rules" type behavior in academia. This is of course a huge generalization, but ask me what it's based on. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics