Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "Cogat Score VQN vs. quantitative battery"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Q and V are important. Strong Q, but weak V suggests that the kid belongs in Level 3 instantly of full term AAP.[/quote] I am not sure if I agree because there are also other data points. Kid can also have a weak V but strong VALLSS. What would be a weak V?[/quote] Is VALLS meaningful for kids at the top? Is it actually being used this way? Doesn’t a strong VALLS simply mean a kid can read? I think VALLS is a good indicator for finding kids in need of reading intervention. It seems like a poor screener, on the other hand, to determine actual reading ability. My impression is that it wasn’t intended for that use, anyhow. [/quote] It was not intended as anything but a screener to make sure kids can read, but iReady is not intended to be anything but a screener, either. iReady was used last year, so I assume VAALS will be used this year. Cue eye roll. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
