Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "RTO and 1102 workforce"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]1102 here and going to office 2 days a week. My agency's procurement arm has been going through a major change since our longtime leader retired about 4 years ago. We are now going through a reorg that will change the way we handle client offices by utilizing a category management approach. We hired a lot of new folks - many of which are remote and hundreds/thousands of miles outside the Beltway. The role we play is inherently governmental (deeply). While we have contractor support, those TPCs can never hold warrants. That said, I see a critical push to not exercise option periods for staffing task orders/contracts. I also see the DOGE IT-bro types getting tripped up by the FAR (plus agency supplements) in a major way. [b]There will be a hiring freeze[/b], and a LOT of supervisory roles will be held in "acting" status. [/quote] I see this happening as well. There is a quiet panic at our place to get some staffing BPAs in place ASAP just in case we start losing govies and can't rehire. But I don't see it happening in time. Your point about the FAR is interesting. Is this perhaps one of the federal regulations they could set their sights on as going away? What a $*%show that would be. Holy moly. Can you imagine the corruption? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics