Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Cars and Transportation
Reply to "Land Cruiser 1958 vs. 4Runner Sport"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Any reason why you are not considering a used 200 series ? I have had LCs and LX since 1994. Also a couple of GXs along the way. 1994 80 Series 1999 100 Series - 3 of them 2003 GX470 2004 LX470 2008 GX470 2011 LX570 I paid almost as much for an 80 series LC in 1994 as they want for a new LC today. They are not the same car. Plus why get the first year of a new gen - for 56k you can get a nice used 200 series. I still have an older LX470 and I keep my eyes out for a nice one but they are expensive when clean. And with the VTTI Engine they handle quite well. Best for overall reliability is probably the 1999 LC 100 series. But it’s a dog with the old 3 speed transmission. And while the clean 100 series are expensive the 570s are coming down. You can a nice 10 year old one with less than 100k for under 30k. And I also seek out the older GX470s - they are not full size but they are exceptionally well built. I realize this is not what you asked but if you like LCs those are my thoughts from 30 years of LC ownership. Great trucks. [/quote] Not OP but safety tech on those is non-existent and no Carplay[/quote] LC people don't care about this because 1. we can drive and 2. audio is easy to upgrade. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics