Reply to AAP still possible?

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "AAP still possible?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]OP, you might be interested in page 66 of the AAP equity report from 4 years ago.
https://go.boarddocs.com/vsba/fairfax/Board.nsf/files/BPLQKV69B096/$file/FCPS%20final%20report%2005.05.20.pdf

It shows the mean, min, max, and standard deviation of test scores of kids admitted to AAP.  
[/quote]

OP here. This is exactly the kind of info I like. It's odd to see that for white kids the  range for NNAT is wider, with children scoring as low as 70 being AAP eligible (for Asians it's 93).

I'm not sure why people say it's the "least reliable" metric? Naglieri is a respected researcher, and on the face of it, it seems like a reasonable test of nonverbal intelligence. What are the complaints specifically? I found this wiki article on it (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naglieri_Nonverbal_Ability_Test) and it mentioned that there is more variabilty than expected and more high scores than expected, but without more context it's hard to interpret those claims.[/quote]

It is the least comprehensive, since it's only testing one sliver of kids' intelligence.  I wouldn't call it the "least reliable" in general, but it is in the way FCPS is using it.  It is given in 1st grade, and kids can mature quite a bit between the NNAT and the CogAT testing windows.  It's on a computer, so impulsive clicking can be a problem, especially when kids have been trained to do that in their iready testing.  It's also likely the first timed test any of the kids have encountered.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics