Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Reply to "Algebra 2 HN and Algebra 2 differences"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I wrote a handout on this for our curriculum night. I can copy the text of it tomorrow when I’m back at my desk. That said, it will vary significantly by the school and teachers. In short at my school: honors moves significantly faster and requires students to go beyond what is explicitly shown in class. For example: Regular A2 will be shown various types of polynomials and how to factor them. The test will be an assortment of polynomials and students will be asked to factor them. A2H will get the same instruction, but then will be given something like 4x^3-2x^2-kx+1 and asked to find a value of k that makes it factor able with using the grouping method. It also includes at least one or two extra standards/skills per unit. In my regular A2 class, I have time to spend a day reviewing prerequisite skills. In honors, students need to already have mastered (and retained) all the material from prior coursework, because the review days are taken up with extension topics. For example: Both classes solved systems of quadratic equations. An algebra 1 standard is systems of linear equations. In A2 I spent time (maybe 1/2 block) reviewing simplistic systems that didn’t require much manipulation (terms dropped out easily) before shifting into more difficult examples with new content. After we covered all 3 methods with quadratics, I had a full day devoted to practicing all methods. In honors, we spent a 5 minute warm up reviewing what a system is, and then dove right into the new stuff, because in addition to quadratics we had to cover systems where x is a function of y (sideways parabolas), and all graphing and solving was expected to be done by hand. In gen ed, students were able to use calculators to graph equations and find intersections to check work or find ordered pairs for graphing. If you are in an AP school, both classes are a stepping stone to precalc. You can think of gen ed as the AB version of calc and honors as BC. 75% of the class is the same, but that extra 25% really increases the pace for honors. If you are at an IB school, a successful gen ed algebra 2 student will struggle with the rigor expected in IB analysis, but should be fine with IB applications. If analysis is desired, I would make the jump to honors.[/quote] This is so helpful, thank you for taking the time to write this out. I have a child who is currently in Geometry HN and is doing fine but not great (solid B average). They are not planning to pursue a college degree that is super math heavy (ie no engineering or hard sciences). Based on teacher feedback (teacher said my child could go either way - may have a tough time in HN Alg 2, but may not feel challenged in Reg) -- we suggested our kid drop down to regular Algebra 2 and build a solid foundation instead of possibly being overwhelmed in HN. Since they don't really NEED to get to BC Calc for future plans, this seemed like the smarter move. Especially since my child will take HN or AP in all other major subject areas and will likely have more time to focus on those with a less rigorous math course. Anything we're not thinking of? [/quote] NP. As you know, it is easy to step off of the math train but nearly impossible to step back on. If he drops down to regular Algebra II instead of H, then Calc BC will no longer be an option. He is sure about not taking Physics also?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics