Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "MCPS Teachers: Why cling to grade inflation and disregard MAP?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Mathnasium has a strong financial incentive to tell you that your kid is behind at the beginning and then, after months of classes there, they will probably proudly announce that she is fixed, thanks to them! I wouldn’t assume that the teacher is hiding something and mathnasium is the objective arbiter here. [/quote] I can accept that Mathnasium has a vest financial incentive here, but their assessment is not the only data point I'm using to draw the conclusions I'm drawing. To recap what I stated in my original post: 1) I'm using the MAP-M scores, which MCPS administers. She's been on a downward traectory for the last three marking periods from her peak, when she was in the 71st percentile. 2) Her frustration and struggle with some homework assignments 3) The fact that she got a C and D on her math tests/quizzes for the first time 4) The Mathnasium assessment, which matches what MAP-M found. And no, they did not have access to her MAP-M results, so it's not like they manipulated it to match So with all of that evidence, why I should ignore that she's below grade level when multiple data points tell me she is?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics