Reply to Rankings won't cause schools to radically change in quality, especially WM

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Rankings won't cause schools to radically change in quality, especially WM"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What a fortuitous coincidence that exactly when W&M could greatly benefit from helping the downtrodden, the country finds itself with an abundance of ambitious first-generation college-age immigrants whom the progressives in Williamsburg would probably welcome with open arms. [/quote]

The do. WM is now tuition free for Pell grant students, and these students graduate at a high rate.  They are welcome and supported.

The question is, should WM do soft/hard DEI targets like VT, even at the expense of taking more qualified students? I have a kid who went through TJ during the admissions criteria change, and am inclined to say no. [/quote]

+1  I think W&M should stay committed to its high academic standards--it's what will ultimately stand the test of time.  Being tuition-free for Pell grant students who qualify makes so much sense--actively recruiting strong low-income students who might not be familiar with W&M, sure.   Adjusting your admissions criteria to favor first gen students is wrong IMO--and though it made VT rise in the rankings, I don't think it's a great move overall for the institution or the state.    I'm a progressive, but I think this generates backlash and does a disservice to students.  The point should be about removing barriers to attendance for all not adjusting admissions criteria to strongly favor a group--especially in a public institution.  I don't have any students applying to college right now so it's not about what will help my kid get in somewhere.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics