Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "MLS academies protected list?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Well I’m not a lawyer but I think the question is why wouldn’t it be legal? No one has a “right” to play professional soccer for MLS. Let’s say you and me decided to start a new soccer league called DCUM Soccer, and we formed a for-profit privately owned corporation. And we decided that the DCUM Soccer league would only have two teams: Red Team and Blue Team. And then we agreed that the Red Team will be comprised of only players living west of the Mississippi River, and the Blue Team will only be comprised of those living east of the Mississippi River; and we made corporate by-laws enforcing those territories for Red Team and Blue Team. Little Johnny lives in Maryland but the Blue Team doesn’t pick him; and the Red Team “can’t” pick him because he lives in the Blue Team territory. What’s not legal about this? It’s just a private business with stupid rules; it’s not illegal. [/quote] I think your example might pass muster if it’s all happening in one state. But I think the protected list could be considered a restraint of trade or antitrust laws. Also wouldn’t these rules be prohibited by the commerce clause? Ie, They interfere or discriminate against interstate commerce?[/quote] Here you go: https://www.justice.gov/atr/file/903511/download[/quote] Interesting. This seems to be the crux of it: “An agreement among competing employers to limit or fix the terms of employment for potential hires may violate the antitrust laws if the agreement constrains individual firm decision-making with regard to wages, salaries, or benefits; terms of employment; or even job opportunities.” Nice “may” there lol … it “may” or it may not. Thanks for clearing that up DOJ! [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics