Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well I’m not a lawyer but I think the question is why wouldn’t it be legal?
No one has a “right” to play professional soccer for MLS.
Let’s say you and me decided to start a new soccer league called DCUM Soccer, and we formed a for-profit privately owned corporation.
And we decided that the DCUM Soccer league would only have two teams: Red Team and Blue Team. And then we agreed that the Red Team will be comprised of only players living west of the Mississippi River, and the Blue Team will only be comprised of those living east of the Mississippi River; and we made corporate by-laws enforcing those territories for Red Team and Blue Team.
Little Johnny lives in Maryland but the Blue Team doesn’t pick him; and the Red Team “can’t” pick him because he lives in the Blue Team territory.
What’s not legal about this? It’s just a private business with stupid rules; it’s not illegal.
I think your example might pass muster if it’s all happening in one state. But I think the protected list could be considered a restraint of trade or antitrust laws. Also wouldn’t these rules be prohibited by the commerce clause? Ie, They interfere or discriminate against interstate commerce?
Here you go: https://www.justice.gov/atr/file/903511/download
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well I’m not a lawyer but I think the question is why wouldn’t it be legal?
No one has a “right” to play professional soccer for MLS.
Let’s say you and me decided to start a new soccer league called DCUM Soccer, and we formed a for-profit privately owned corporation.
And we decided that the DCUM Soccer league would only have two teams: Red Team and Blue Team. And then we agreed that the Red Team will be comprised of only players living west of the Mississippi River, and the Blue Team will only be comprised of those living east of the Mississippi River; and we made corporate by-laws enforcing those territories for Red Team and Blue Team.
Little Johnny lives in Maryland but the Blue Team doesn’t pick him; and the Red Team “can’t” pick him because he lives in the Blue Team territory.
What’s not legal about this? It’s just a private business with stupid rules; it’s not illegal.
I think your example might pass muster if it’s all happening in one state. But I think the protected list could be considered a restraint of trade or antitrust laws. Also wouldn’t these rules be prohibited by the commerce clause? Ie, They interfere or discriminate against interstate commerce?
Anonymous wrote:Well if you’re the lawyer and posed the question, it must be a doozy lol
I mean I guess we’ll just have to see how the legal challenge plays out. Does anyone have any information on the court case? I tried to Google it but it didn’t seem anything was on point.
Anonymous wrote:Ok let’s wait for the “lawyers” to weigh in on the DCUM soccer message board lol
Anonymous wrote:Well I’m not a lawyer but I think the question is why wouldn’t it be legal?
No one has a “right” to play professional soccer for MLS.
Let’s say you and me decided to start a new soccer league called DCUM Soccer, and we formed a for-profit privately owned corporation.
And we decided that the DCUM Soccer league would only have two teams: Red Team and Blue Team. And then we agreed that the Red Team will be comprised of only players living west of the Mississippi River, and the Blue Team will only be comprised of those living east of the Mississippi River; and we made corporate by-laws enforcing those territories for Red Team and Blue Team.
Little Johnny lives in Maryland but the Blue Team doesn’t pick him; and the Red Team “can’t” pick him because he lives in the Blue Team territory.
What’s not legal about this? It’s just a private business with stupid rules; it’s not illegal.
Anonymous wrote:Well I’m not a lawyer but I think the question is why wouldn’t it be legal?
No one has a “right” to play professional soccer for MLS.
Let’s say you and me decided to start a new soccer league called DCUM Soccer, and we formed a for-profit privately owned corporation.
And we decided that the DCUM Soccer league would only have two teams: Red Team and Blue Team. And then we agreed that the Red Team will be comprised of only players living west of the Mississippi River, and the Blue Team will only be comprised of those living east of the Mississippi River; and we made corporate by-laws enforcing those territories for Red Team and Blue Team.
Little Johnny lives in Maryland but the Blue Team doesn’t pick him; and the Red Team “can’t” pick him because he lives in the Blue Team territory.
What’s not legal about this? It’s just a private business with stupid rules; it’s not illegal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Like, how is it legal? Is it in the fine print when a kid joins any club? Or gets a player card? Or when they try out for an MLS Academy?
It probably isn't, and it's being legally challenged as we speak.
Anonymous wrote:It’s unlawful restraint of trade. It’s legal for professional sports when it is collectively bargained, but illegal otherwise. That’s why unions threaten to decertify during lockouts
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Like, how is it legal? Is it in the fine print when a kid joins any club? Or gets a player card? Or when they try out for an MLS Academy?
It probably isn't, and it's being legally challenged as we speak.
Anonymous wrote:
Like, how is it legal? Is it in the fine print when a kid joins any club? Or gets a player card? Or when they try out for an MLS Academy?