Reply to Good player development—what does it look like?

Forum Index » Lacrosse

Reply to "Good player development—what does it look like?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Hit the wall and camps [/quote]

So that makes sense for at-home work, but what about from the club perspective?   How do the best clubs go about developing their players?[/quote]

I'll give it a go.  Two kids, one HS, one MS, played in Moco for the big clubs, both A and B teams.

Individual skills development is the responsibility of the player and by extension the parents.  As early as 3rd/4th grade the player should be practicing technique on their own (rebounder, GBs, position specific skills, etc.).  Past a certain point every player is expected to be able to play with both hands, catch and throw properly, and have sufficient technique to play their specific position.  Lots of parents supplement the player's on-their-own work with private coaching and camps.  It's expensive and psychotic but that's where we are.

Now on to the club perspective--if I were starting over and doing this again, what I would want from the club is a coherent playing philosophy, i.e, coaches that have a plan for specific, common game situations.  Does the team work on a clearing play?  Does it repeat that play enough in practices such that clearing isn't an issue in games?  Do players in the clear know exactly where they're supposed to be and what their roles are?  Repeat this for other situations--riding, man-up offense and defense, fast breaks/unsettled, etc.  Essentially, is the team prepared to play an actual game?

The other thing I'd look for at club level would be player accountability...when players screw up one of those situations I mentioned above, are there consequences?  I don't mean screaming/yelling, or benching a guy who makes one mistake--I mean, when a player, regardless of skill level, is consistently in the wrong place at the wrong time for any given situation, are they pulled from the game and replaced by another player, maybe less skillful, who knows what his job is and how to do it?  Are attackers who consistently dodge into double and triple teams and lose ball pulled from the game?  Are players who consistently take penalties and cause their team go a man down pulled from the game?  Are poles who miss slides and cause a crease dunk goal pulled from the game?

All of this basically adds up what's loosely called "lax IQ" and to me that's the job of the coaches, and the responsibility of the players to execute a plan.  There's waaaayyyyy too many teams where players play hero ball on offense, and make dumb mistakes on defense, and they stay on the field because they're the team's "studs" and the coach is afraid of antagonizing their parents.

Don't want to name names but there's a few prominent coaches out there who are great recruiters and are adept at poaching other clubs' players, but really aren't getting much out their various age groups because they don't care about actually coaching, they just want to list D1 recruits on their website.  The real test of a good coach IMO is one that wins at a high school team--with a few exceptions you have to deal with the players you have on grade 10-12 and cannot just wholesale steal another, better team's squad.  Some of these coaches simultaneously coach a HS team and club team and you can tell the difference because the HS performance is terrible.[/quote]

Great post.  Agree and thanks for taking the time to write it out.  The opposite of TLTR, it has the type of detail that is actually informative.  Thanks[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics