Reply to Longshot: Veo Camera

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "Longshot: Veo Camera"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Rountree][quote=DaniRojas][quote=Rountree][quote=NVA-Soccer][quote=PICKMECOACH]Rountree wrote:
Trace is much more bang for the buck. Don't have a camera to lend, but if you want it filmed manually with a tower camera (much better video quality) - happy to do it for $50 per match.

Thanks. We will just go without recordings at this point.

Having compared Veo 1 to Trace for our team I disagree. Trace quality and post processing is poor.

Agree with DaniRoja, Veo vid quality much better, they just need to get their act together as to customer service and CAM issue's.[/quote]

Always found quality of picture to be an issue with Trace. [/quote]

The video quality is lackluster, but they've added a really cool "Multicam feature" where anyone with a phone from any angle can just hit record and it will sync up with the video - different angles at better quality at no additional cost - with the stats. Still taking Trace over Veo. [/quote]

It sounds like you're choosing iPhone over Veo....?

The Trace trackers are a hassle and when we trialed it the data was not accurate. It was fun to look at and a great gimmick but if we can't trust the data, what good is it?
[/quote]

Not a single problem with the data. In fact, incredibly accurate. If you're looking for video quality, neither Veo nor Trace are your best option. The iPhone has higher resolution than both. Pairing the two (overhead Trace and on the ground phones - unlimited number) gives you the best of both worlds - overhead view with heat map plus time stamped and synced ground level video complimented by stats. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics