Rountree
Post 10/12/2022 20:38     Subject: Re:Longshot: Veo Camera
DaniRojas wrote:
Rountree wrote:
NVA-Soccer wrote:
PICKMECOACH wrote:Rountree wrote:
Trace is much more bang for the buck. Don't have a camera to lend, but if you want it filmed manually with a tower camera (much better video quality) - happy to do it for $50 per match.


Thanks. We will just go without recordings at this point.

Having compared Veo 1 to Trace for our team I disagree. Trace quality and post processing is poor.

Agree with DaniRoja, Veo vid quality much better, they just need to get their act together as to customer service and CAM issue's.


Always found quality of picture to be an issue with Trace.


The video quality is lackluster, but they've added a really cool "Multicam feature" where anyone with a phone from any angle can just hit record and it will sync up with the video - different angles at better quality at no additional cost - with the stats. Still taking Trace over Veo.


It sounds like you're choosing iPhone over Veo....?

The Trace trackers are a hassle and when we trialed it the data was not accurate. It was fun to look at and a great gimmick but if we can't trust the data, what good is it?


Not a single problem with the data. In fact, incredibly accurate. If you're looking for video quality, neither Veo nor Trace are your best option. The iPhone has higher resolution than both. Pairing the two (overhead Trace and on the ground phones - unlimited number) gives you the best of both worlds - overhead view with heat map plus time stamped and synced ground level video complimented by stats.
DaniRojas
Post 10/12/2022 16:56     Subject: Re:Longshot: Veo Camera
Rountree wrote:
NVA-Soccer wrote:
PICKMECOACH wrote:Rountree wrote:
Trace is much more bang for the buck. Don't have a camera to lend, but if you want it filmed manually with a tower camera (much better video quality) - happy to do it for $50 per match.


Thanks. We will just go without recordings at this point.

Having compared Veo 1 to Trace for our team I disagree. Trace quality and post processing is poor.

Agree with DaniRoja, Veo vid quality much better, they just need to get their act together as to customer service and CAM issue's.


Always found quality of picture to be an issue with Trace.


The video quality is lackluster, but they've added a really cool "Multicam feature" where anyone with a phone from any angle can just hit record and it will sync up with the video - different angles at better quality at no additional cost - with the stats. Still taking Trace over Veo.


It sounds like you're choosing iPhone over Veo....?

The Trace trackers are a hassle and when we trialed it the data was not accurate. It was fun to look at and a great gimmick but if we can't trust the data, what good is it?
Rountree
Post 10/12/2022 15:50     Subject: Re:Longshot: Veo Camera
NVA-Soccer wrote:
PICKMECOACH wrote:Rountree wrote:
Trace is much more bang for the buck. Don't have a camera to lend, but if you want it filmed manually with a tower camera (much better video quality) - happy to do it for $50 per match.


Thanks. We will just go without recordings at this point.

Having compared Veo 1 to Trace for our team I disagree. Trace quality and post processing is poor.

Agree with DaniRoja, Veo vid quality much better, they just need to get their act together as to customer service and CAM issue's.


Always found quality of picture to be an issue with Trace.


The video quality is lackluster, but they've added a really cool "Multicam feature" where anyone with a phone from any angle can just hit record and it will sync up with the video - different angles at better quality at no additional cost - with the stats. Still taking Trace over Veo.
NVA-Soccer
Post 10/12/2022 15:14     Subject: Re:Longshot: Veo Camera
PICKMECOACH wrote:Rountree wrote:
Trace is much more bang for the buck. Don't have a camera to lend, but if you want it filmed manually with a tower camera (much better video quality) - happy to do it for $50 per match.


Thanks. We will just go without recordings at this point.

Having compared Veo 1 to Trace for our team I disagree. Trace quality and post processing is poor.

Agree with DaniRoja, Veo vid quality much better, they just need to get their act together as to customer service and CAM issue's.


Always found quality of picture to be an issue with Trace.
PICKMECOACH
Post 10/08/2022 07:53     Subject: Re:Longshot: Veo Camera
Rountree wrote:
Trace is much more bang for the buck. Don't have a camera to lend, but if you want it filmed manually with a tower camera (much better video quality) - happy to do it for $50 per match.


Thanks. We will just go without recordings at this point.

Having compared Veo 1 to Trace for our team I disagree. Trace quality and post processing is poor.

Agree with DaniRoja, Veo vid quality much better, they just need to get their act together as to customer service and CAM issue's.
DaniRojas
Post 10/07/2022 22:33     Subject: Re:Longshot: Veo Camera
Rountree wrote:Trace is much more bang for the buck. Don't have a camera to lend, but if you want it filmed manually with a tower camera (much better video quality) - happy to do it for $50 per match.


Thanks. We will just go without recordings at this point.

Having compared Veo 1 to Trace for our team I disagree. Trace quality and post processing is poor.
Rountree
Post 10/07/2022 18:00     Subject: Re:Longshot: Veo Camera
Trace is much more bang for the buck. Don't have a camera to lend, but if you want it filmed manually with a tower camera (much better video quality) - happy to do it for $50 per match.
NVA-Soccer
Post 10/06/2022 14:46     Subject: Re:Longshot: Veo Camera
DaniRojas wrote:Connecting to the Veo2 can be a little annoying, but the primary issues are hardware-related. Lots of frustration and some jubilation here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/522303685518817


Going to be fun trying to get connected in the winter months
DaniRojas
Post 10/04/2022 23:05     Subject: Re:Longshot: Veo Camera
Connecting to the Veo2 can be a little annoying, but the primary issues are hardware-related. Lots of frustration and some jubilation here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/522303685518817
PICKMECOACH
Post 10/04/2022 16:28     Subject: Re:Longshot: Veo Camera
Lots of folks got lemon VEO2 many issues like not charging, specially the first 2 batches they shipped out, mine has been working great. With the new firm update should fixed many issues.
NVA-Soccer
Post 10/04/2022 16:17     Subject: Longshot: Veo Camera
Seems like a lot of people have had issues connecting to VEO 2. The app is difficult to operate and the feedback from veo is to restart the app or log out and back in.
MadridFan
Post 10/04/2022 15:26     Subject: Longshot: Veo Camera
A thread on SoCal Soccer Forum on others having issues with the Veo-2 - https://socalsoccer.com/threads/veo-2-camera-advice-connectivity-issues.20763/
DaniRojas
Post 10/03/2022 21:35     Subject: Longshot: Veo Camera
Huge long shot but I thought I'd try! Does anyone in Northern VA have a Veo 1 they're not using this Columbus Day weekend? I'd be happy to put down a large deposit if you'd let me borrow it. And if there's any way I can be useful to you I'd gladly lend a hand as well.

My Veo1 served us well. We upgraded to a Veo2 and it's been a nightmare. I'm pretty sure we'll be without a camera for the Columbus Day tourney and that would be a big bummer. Thanks for even reading this!