Reply to Why didn’t the womens health protection act try to go beyond Roe!?!

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Why didn’t the womens health protection act try to go beyond Roe!?!"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't know why. They could still do it. I believe they can put forth a standard 24/25 week bill wiyh rational limits and exceptions and enough Republicans will peel off to join it, including Cocaine Mitch. [/quote]

Not so sure you are right but all efforts should be given to this[/quote]

Yea, I was happy about RvW being overturned because it was a bad decision, and hoped/expected that new legislation would be passed to codify protection for abortion. I was expecting this to be bad news for Republicans because it gives Democrats a easy win. And yet…[/quote]

I'm so glad that your need for precision in language overtakes the value you place on women's autonomy and health.[/quote]

It's precisely that I value the rights and privileged of individual people that I insist on having laws passed by legislature and not divined through the courts. We need these laws to be clear and concise so that the protections are unambiguous and durable, so that the next yahoo that comes along can't undo them easily. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics