Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "McLean not laying down after Arlington ECNL"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]BRYC should have done this a long time ago with BAC, SYC and LMVSC[/quote] These partnerships only help the top team. It hurts the club that they leave and makes the teams at the other clubs much weaker.[/quote] It depends how they are set up, named, marketed and managed. VDA's partnership was probably a good thing for VSA for example - and would have been for CYA had they not shot themselves in the foot. VDA was really PWSI - but they chose to use a new name for the DA club, shared costs and revenue, allowed for joint management, split practices between locations and the coaches could be drawn from all member clubs. If it's just a "give us your kids and c ya later" arrangement then I agree.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics