Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:BRYC should have done this a long time ago with BAC, SYC and LMVSC
These partnerships only help the top team. It hurts the club that they leave and makes the teams at the other clubs much weaker.
It depends how they are set up, named, marketed and managed. VDA's partnership was probably a good thing for VSA for example - and would have been for CYA had they not shot themselves in the foot. VDA was really PWSI - but they chose to use a new name for the DA club, shared costs and revenue, allowed for joint management, split practices between locations and the coaches could be drawn from all member clubs.
If it's just a "give us your kids and c ya later" arrangement then I agree.