Reply to VEO or HUDL

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "VEO or HUDL"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]I have had VEO for a while now (summer of 2019 and now have 62 matches recorded). If you can get past the price (high) of the hardware and the yearly service cost (for website and AI) then I would recommend it highly.  One ability they put in last year was the ability to create highlights and download them to post anywhere. Our academy director was looking into to buying a few last year and this is the information I sent him. Some thigs may have changed in the year since I sent it, but here it is (I added some things I would like to see in the last portion of this and sent it to Veo, too). They have recently created and IOS app to handle the recording of video, but I have not tried it yet.

Pros 
1.       Ease of use (These are the steps)
         a.       Setup camera on Tripod and turn on 
         b.       Use iphone to attach to the camera’s wireless webpage and check if the two camera’s are aligned with the field
         c.       click record on webpage to start recording
         d.       Click record again to stop recording
         e.       Take camera home and attach to router and camera automatically uploads to the website for processing. 
2.       AI automatically recognizes goals and highlights them in the app
3.       Waterproof housing
4.       There a different views you can set on the website, so if you want to see where your goalie is playing while the ball is on the other side of the field, you can switch views and pan over to the goalie in the video.
5.       Responsive support (even though they are in Europe)
6.       1080P video (two go pro's I think)
7.       Parent’s filming a match is always a dicey proposition as they may not follow the action with the camera throughout the match. This follows the ball throughout and frees the parent to just enjoy the game.
8.       Have not had any issues with the heat and it was able to film without issues this past Sunday when it was 91 degrees.
9.       If you are a coach or admin of the team and pay for the monthly elite service, you can download the processed video to post anywhere. [i](You can now create and download highlights)[/i]
 Cons
1.       New company and they are still working on their webpage functionality. [i] (Works quite well now)[/i]
2.       SLA for processing of video takes up to 24 hours to finish (This is because they are using AI to locate the ball frame by frame and the game files are about 4 gigs for our games.) [i](They have improved this and the AI is much faster now - maybe 5 hours average)[/i]
3.       Base Cost is a bit high and you must pay the monthly service charge to upload videos and have website access. Although I don’t think the cost changes if you have multiple cameras and multiple teams with the elite package, so the CBA will be better in those cases for clubs.

Ideas for moving forward.

1.	Analytics
a.	Need to show possession, passing, and shooting statistics automatically.
b.	Need to give the ability to download the whole pitch video. Like the interactive video without the interactive portion. I can see how this could be used to upload into a package, such as gameface ai (http://flixsense.com/soccer/), to get some deeper analytics. Or you could partner with them or write your own software. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics