Reply to 8/27 APS Work Session—Elementary Boundaries

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "8/27 APS Work Session—Elementary Boundaries"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What school is the easy money for where they will move Spanish immersion?  Carlin Springs?  ATS?  Barcroft?[/quote]

I don’t k ow, but Goldstein was pretty clear he wants an option program in NW Arlington, but centrally located NW Arlington.  $5 says he’s privately pushing (again) for it to be Nottingham.[/quote]

An option program in NW makes little sense unless you want to make it inaccessible to South Arlington residents.

If there are too many seats in NW, the new school — Reed — should be an option school. Then you don’t have to disrupt everyone around it in re-drawing boundaries. It is certainly a better location for an option school than Nottingham. [/quote]
[b]
I agree, but wash “they promised” reed wouldn’t be an option School. So much better not to move everyone around. [/quote][/b]

APS and the School Board have promised many things over the last two years that never happened.  Not sure why Reed-- which is the obvious, least disruptive location for an option school-- should be untouchable. [/quote]

There was a formal board resolution that Reed would be neighborhood.  They can’t just change course on a dime, they’d have to pass another formal board resolution with community participation, etc.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics