Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Infertility Support and Discussion
Reply to "IUI = IVF at 42??"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Yes my dr said with my numbers (terrible, AMH .1) and age (over 40), that IUI is equally successful (or NOT successful) as IVF and a lot cheaper. Just a weird mind-shift bc I thought IVF would be the holy grail [/quote] This doesn't mean that IUI has a better chance of working just that they both have terrible odds of working. My AHM was .3 at age 34. I tried for years, but eventually got pregnant naturally. At 37 when I was retested, my AHM was <.01. I did actual cycle IVF. My RE (Dominion) said that with DOR letting "the best egg" come forward is often the way to go. I would look into NC IVF. I think that in my case, my eggs were hard and not able to fertilize as I never had BFPs. That's why NC IVF worked. I did ICSI as well. Good luck to you. I would not waste any time or money on IUI at age 42. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics