Team Hillary's plan re: health announcement

Forum Index » Political Discussion
[Post New]09/12/2016 05:42
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Nice to see the deplorables out in action!


nice to see the irony in your post, PP

love how Hillary, who claims that she and her supporters are open-minded and forward thinking, is stooping to Trump's level of name calling

Good job, loser! But thanks for the laugh!


Look in the mirror, poster. You are the biggest loser there is.


Again, if she's the "better" candidate, she would not have stooped so low.

That's the bottom line. She offended people who may have been on the edge. But by resorting to name-calling and generalizations, she simply made a Trump-like move.

not very bright imo - and certainly will not be able to hold it together

So call me a loser, too, but at least I understand the basics of argument. And for as "educated" as Hillary makes herself out to be, she was lacking in common sense.
[Post New]09/12/2016 05:45
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Just curious if you tinfoil hat name-callers can admit that the tinfoil wearers were correct? You keep saying the health stuff is a conspiracy theory. Now you've seen it for your own eyes. At what point will you believe it?


Who was correct? She doesn't have brain damage or Parkinson's or epilepsy or any of the other nonsense posted by the tin foil lobby. She has seasonal allergies, takes a blood thinner and thyroid med, and now has a mild case of walking pneumonia. So admission necessary. Goodnight.


And what's next?

an ulcer?

maybe cataract surgery?

Let's see what other conditions pop up between now and November.
[Post New]09/12/2016 06:07
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:What is CTR pp?


It's the belief of one or more paranoid Trumpkins that anyone who posts pro-Hillary things here is part of a conspiracy by the pro-Hillary super PAC Correct the Record to take over the internet and suppress the voices of Trump supporters.

np
And it's the belief of many HRC supporters that if you say anything negative about her then you are a Trump supporter.

The polls show that the majority don't like either candidate and the majority also don't trust either.


I don't personally believe it makes you someone who approves of Trump, but since it's going to be Trump or Clinton, tearing down Clinton implicitly supports the Trump campaign by trying to cut down the support for his opposition


There are two other candidates that are eligible to receive my vote and I have the right to abstain. One of which I will likely choose.
[Post New]09/12/2016 06:22
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:OP here - I forgot to add with with HIPPA (HIIPA, HIPAA? I always get this wrong) - Team Hilary knows they can get away with their future lie of when she was diagnosed.


Not that they would be bound to divulge to the general public just becasue they work for a candidate but they wouldn't likely violate HIPAA if they did.

https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/laws-regulations/


Her medical records are clearly Protected Health Information (PHI) under HIPAA. I have no idea what you are tslking about.


When you respond to a comment within a thread do you not read the previous posts? The pp stated "I forgot to add with with HIPPA (HIIPA, HIPAA? I always get this wrong) - Team Hilary knows they can get away with their future lie of when she was diagnosed."

PP was stating they could deny and claim HIPAA as they reason for the non disclose. HIPAA does not cover all entities and we are not discussing her actual records. Her employees/associates (so long as they are not charged with her medical care etc.) would not be in violation by disclosing her medical condition. And I provided a link that explains this quite well.

That said most of those associated with her in this campaign are either volunteers or non employee's. It would be highly unusual for them to have employee status since doing so would require HRC to pay a significant amount in payroll taxes. So, they are hired on a 1099 non employee basis. However, since HIPAA would not cover her from disclosure by certain individuals she could draw up a separate non disclose.
[Post New]09/12/2016 06:24
Anonymous
Whenever that 3:00 AM phone call occurs, it will will a 911 call for an ambulance.
[Post New]09/12/2016 07:25
Anonymous
So I was looking into what happens if the President-elect dies after the election and before inauguration.

It seems that if it happens between the election and the Electoral college decision in December, the DNC can slide in another candidate (doesn't have to be the VP). If it happens between the Electoral college vote and Jan 20, the VP-elect will be President.

Is that correct? So voting for a clearly infirm Hillary could be very risky indeed. I don't think this exact situation has ever happened before at the Presidential level though so I am curious.
[Post New]09/12/2016 07:30
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:So I was looking into what happens if the President-elect dies after the election and before inauguration.

It seems that if it happens between the election and the Electoral college decision in December, the DNC can slide in another candidate (doesn't have to be the VP). If it happens between the Electoral college vote and Jan 20, the VP-elect will be President.

Is that correct? So voting for a clearly infirm Hillary could be very risky indeed. I don't think this exact situation has ever happened before at the Presidential level though so I am curious.


That could be really devastating.
[Post New]09/12/2016 07:39
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So I was looking into what happens if the President-elect dies after the election and before inauguration.

It seems that if it happens between the election and the Electoral college decision in December, the DNC can slide in another candidate (doesn't have to be the VP). If it happens between the Electoral college vote and Jan 20, the VP-elect will be President.

Is that correct? So voting for a clearly infirm Hillary could be very risky indeed. I don't think this exact situation has ever happened before at the Presidential level though so I am curious.


That could be really devastating.


You don't think there's a better Dem candidate than Hillary? You have low standards.

If this happens and the DNC puts in someone else, I'll vote for that candidate. At this point, my Ind vote is going third party. Hillary is a hot mess.
[Post New]09/12/2016 07:50
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:So I was looking into what happens if the President-elect dies after the election and before inauguration.

It seems that if it happens between the election and the Electoral college decision in December, the DNC can slide in another candidate (doesn't have to be the VP). If it happens between the Electoral college vote and Jan 20, the VP-elect will be President.

Is that correct? So voting for a clearly infirm Hillary could be very risky indeed. I don't think this exact situation has ever happened before at the Presidential level though so I am curious.


That could be really devastating.


You don't think there's a better Dem candidate than Hillary? You have low standards.

If this happens and the DNC puts in someone else, I'll vote for that candidate. At this point, my Ind vote is going third party. Hillary is a hot mess.

+ 1 There's no way I'm voting for Hillary, and I would relish the thought of a viable candidate against Trump. The fact that the Democrats are desperately trying to defend their terrible candidate when they would definitely win with a "replacement" candidate just shows that brain-washed they are. I'm still hearing them insist that Hillary is an excellent candidate who has done nothing wrong.
[Post New]09/12/2016 09:18
maria
Site Admin Offline
There are too many Hillary (a candidate) health related topics. Please post to the following thread:

http://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/583207.page
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: 

Search   Recent Topics   Hottest Topics