Is Sarah Jessica Parker beautiful?

[Anonymous]

I think Sarah is lovely, she has a striking eye color and nice smile.

Why are there so many threads on women’s appearances? We all have something beautiful about us ladies!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Kardashians are attractive.

Almost 100% would agree.

They just think the Kardashian’s do not deserve fame or are jealous of their success.

I don't agree with you. I think they look very fake and overdone and plastic. Personally, I don't find butt implants, lip injections, pounds of fake hair, etc. attractive. Their faces are so overdone they can't even make expressive faces properly.

I agree with PP. The level of hatred they inspire goes beyond thinking they’re fake or unattractive and straight into bitterness/jealousy territory. The lady upthread who called them pigs is an example. Why else would you use such an over the top insult for people you don’t even know?

Well Kim did make the family famous solely through having sex on camera.

I can only speak for myself, I just don't appreciate that these women have made a living on a hyper sexual image and NO talent. And yes I know some will say they're talented because they've made a lot of money, but they've also had a huge support system financially and PR-wise. They're a horrible example for young girls, women, and even to men on what they should be placing value on in a woman.

Tons of girls had sex on camera yet did not amount to anything. Don't fool yourself. If all it took to be famous was to have on camera...there'd be many more famous people.

Kim is very talented, just not in the way you think. Her sense of the market and audience connection is unrivaled.

+1. People hate her because she doesn’t have a traditionally white look, markets mostly to minorities, and is hugely popular. Mostly white women complain that she’s a horrible example for women, blah blah even though there are other women out there who have done similar things (like Paris Hilton). Miley Cyrus is just as “trashy” and doesn’t inspire the same level of hatred bc she is a regular white girl.

WOW, not only are you reaching, this is offensive. I'm the pp and it has NOTHING to do with race. I was speaking about the Kardashians as a whole and as an example of very fake, exaggerated "beauty." Lots of white women have done these trashy things, you're right. And they aren't good examples either.

Spend some time thinking about why you took this argument to that place, because it was the furthest thing from my mind when I posted it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think Sarah is lovely, she has a striking eye color and nice smile.

Why are there so many threads on women’s appearances? We all have something beautiful about us ladies!

THIS. Sick to death of threads picking apart every single woman people can here. Just feels like you're miserable with your own life so you have to pick apart the looks of a (more successful) stranger.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Kardashians are attractive.

Almost 100% would agree.

They just think the Kardashian’s do not deserve fame or are jealous of their success.

I don't agree with you. I think they look very fake and overdone and plastic. Personally, I don't find butt implants, lip injections, pounds of fake hair, etc. attractive. Their faces are so overdone they can't even make expressive faces properly.

I agree with PP. The level of hatred they inspire goes beyond thinking they’re fake or unattractive and straight into bitterness/jealousy territory. The lady upthread who called them pigs is an example. Why else would you use such an over the top insult for people you don’t even know?

Well Kim did make the family famous solely through having sex on camera.

I can only speak for myself, I just don't appreciate that these women have made a living on a hyper sexual image and NO talent. And yes I know some will say they're talented because they've made a lot of money, but they've also had a huge support system financially and PR-wise. They're a horrible example for young girls, women, and even to men on what they should be placing value on in a woman.

Tons of girls had sex on camera yet did not amount to anything. Don't fool yourself. If all it took to be famous was to have on camera...there'd be many more famous people.

Kim is very talented, just not in the way you think. Her sense of the market and audience connection is unrivaled.

+1. People hate her because she doesn’t have a traditionally white look, markets mostly to minorities, and is hugely popular. Mostly white women complain that she’s a horrible example for women, blah blah even though there are other women out there who have done similar things (like Paris Hilton). Miley Cyrus is just as “trashy” and doesn’t inspire the same level of hatred bc she is a regular white girl.

WOW, not only are you reaching, this is offensive. I'm the pp and it has NOTHING to do with race. I was speaking about the Kardashians as a whole and as an example of very fake, exaggerated "beauty." Lots of white women have done these trashy things, you're right. And they aren't good examples either.

Spend some time thinking about why you took this argument to that place, because it was the furthest thing from my mind when I posted it.

Not a Kardashian fan but the pp's criticism about race isn't far off the mark. They inspire disgust in part because they popularized big butts and thick thighs, which previously was considered "trashy" even though they are common features for POC. White women aesthetic, the power aesthetic, is skinny. I am a skinny ww mostly because being skinny is a class and power expression. The Kardashians turned this in its head and have made well over a billion dollars. Good for them. They are brilliant.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Kardashians are attractive.

Almost 100% would agree.

They just think the Kardashian’s do not deserve fame or are jealous of their success.

I don't agree with you. I think they look very fake and overdone and plastic. Personally, I don't find butt implants, lip injections, pounds of fake hair, etc. attractive. Their faces are so overdone they can't even make expressive faces properly.

I agree with PP. The level of hatred they inspire goes beyond thinking they’re fake or unattractive and straight into bitterness/jealousy territory. The lady upthread who called them pigs is an example. Why else would you use such an over the top insult for people you don’t even know?

Well Kim did make the family famous solely through having sex on camera.

I can only speak for myself, I just don't appreciate that these women have made a living on a hyper sexual image and NO talent. And yes I know some will say they're talented because they've made a lot of money, but they've also had a huge support system financially and PR-wise. They're a horrible example for young girls, women, and even to men on what they should be placing value on in a woman.

Tons of girls had sex on camera yet did not amount to anything. Don't fool yourself. If all it took to be famous was to have on camera...there'd be many more famous people.

Kim is very talented, just not in the way you think. Her sense of the market and audience connection is unrivaled.

+1. People hate her because she doesn’t have a traditionally white look, markets mostly to minorities, and is hugely popular. Mostly white women complain that she’s a horrible example for women, blah blah even though there are other women out there who have done similar things (like Paris Hilton). Miley Cyrus is just as “trashy” and doesn’t inspire the same level of hatred bc she is a regular white girl.

WOW, not only are you reaching, this is offensive. I'm the pp and it has NOTHING to do with race. I was speaking about the Kardashians as a whole and as an example of very fake, exaggerated "beauty." Lots of white women have done these trashy things, you're right. And they aren't good examples either.

Spend some time thinking about why you took this argument to that place, because it was the furthest thing from my mind when I posted it.

You need to spend some time thinking about why you’re so offended by my remarks and whether your own comments reveal unconscious bias. As another poster pointed out, the “fake, exaggerated beauty” features you mention with so much disgust are normal features for many poc. Other than Kim’s sex tape, I don’t see what else they’ve done that so trashy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Kim is very talented, just not in the way you think. Her sense of the market and audience connection is unrivaled.

That you attribute any of this "talent" to Kim herself and not Kris Jenner is a clear sign of Kris' genius. She's the one whose "sense of market and audience connection is unrivaled."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Kardashians are attractive.

Almost 100% would agree.

They just think the Kardashian’s do not deserve fame or are jealous of their success.

I don't agree with you. I think they look very fake and overdone and plastic. Personally, I don't find butt implants, lip injections, pounds of fake hair, etc. attractive. Their faces are so overdone they can't even make expressive faces properly.

I agree with PP. The level of hatred they inspire goes beyond thinking they’re fake or unattractive and straight into bitterness/jealousy territory. The lady upthread who called them pigs is an example. Why else would you use such an over the top insult for people you don’t even know?

Well Kim did make the family famous solely through having sex on camera.

I can only speak for myself, I just don't appreciate that these women have made a living on a hyper sexual image and NO talent. And yes I know some will say they're talented because they've made a lot of money, but they've also had a huge support system financially and PR-wise. They're a horrible example for young girls, women, and even to men on what they should be placing value on in a woman.

Tons of girls had sex on camera yet did not amount to anything. Don't fool yourself. If all it took to be famous was to have on camera...there'd be many more famous people.

Kim is very talented, just not in the way you think. Her sense of the market and audience connection is unrivaled.

+1. People hate her because she doesn’t have a traditionally white look, markets mostly to minorities, and is hugely popular. Mostly white women complain that she’s a horrible example for women, blah blah even though there are other women out there who have done similar things (like Paris Hilton). Miley Cyrus is just as “trashy” and doesn’t inspire the same level of hatred bc she is a regular white girl.

WOW, not only are you reaching, this is offensive. I'm the pp and it has NOTHING to do with race. I was speaking about the Kardashians as a whole and as an example of very fake, exaggerated "beauty." Lots of white women have done these trashy things, you're right. And they aren't good examples either.

Spend some time thinking about why you took this argument to that place, because it was the furthest thing from my mind when I posted it.

Not a Kardashian fan but the pp's criticism about race isn't far off the mark. They inspire disgust in part because they popularized big butts and thick thighs, which previously was considered "trashy" even though they are common features for POC. White women aesthetic, the power aesthetic, is skinny. I am a skinny ww mostly because being skinny is a class and power expression. The Kardashians turned this in its head and have made well over a billion dollars. Good for them. They are brilliant.

They inspire that look because they paid for it. Everything about their physical appearance is pretty much fake. That is the problem. I don't have disgust for women with beautiful, natural bodies of all sizes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Kardashians are attractive.

Almost 100% would agree.

They just think the Kardashian’s do not deserve fame or are jealous of their success.

I don't agree with you. I think they look very fake and overdone and plastic. Personally, I don't find butt implants, lip injections, pounds of fake hair, etc. attractive. Their faces are so overdone they can't even make expressive faces properly.

I agree with PP. The level of hatred they inspire goes beyond thinking they’re fake or unattractive and straight into bitterness/jealousy territory. The lady upthread who called them pigs is an example. Why else would you use such an over the top insult for people you don’t even know?

Well Kim did make the family famous solely through having sex on camera.

I can only speak for myself, I just don't appreciate that these women have made a living on a hyper sexual image and NO talent. And yes I know some will say they're talented because they've made a lot of money, but they've also had a huge support system financially and PR-wise. They're a horrible example for young girls, women, and even to men on what they should be placing value on in a woman.

Tons of girls had sex on camera yet did not amount to anything. Don't fool yourself. If all it took to be famous was to have on camera...there'd be many more famous people.

Kim is very talented, just not in the way you think. Her sense of the market and audience connection is unrivaled.

+1. People hate her because she doesn’t have a traditionally white look, markets mostly to minorities, and is hugely popular. Mostly white women complain that she’s a horrible example for women, blah blah even though there are other women out there who have done similar things (like Paris Hilton). Miley Cyrus is just as “trashy” and doesn’t inspire the same level of hatred bc she is a regular white girl.

WOW, not only are you reaching, this is offensive. I'm the pp and it has NOTHING to do with race. I was speaking about the Kardashians as a whole and as an example of very fake, exaggerated "beauty." Lots of white women have done these trashy things, you're right. And they aren't good examples either.

Spend some time thinking about why you took this argument to that place, because it was the furthest thing from my mind when I posted it.

You need to spend some time thinking about why you’re so offended by my remarks and whether your own comments reveal unconscious bias. As another poster pointed out, the “fake, exaggerated beauty” features you mention with so much disgust are normal features for many poc. Other than Kim’s sex tape, I don’t see what else they’ve done that so trashy.

The fake features are all PAID FOR and not their natural features, POC or not. My comments reveal no unconscious bias, I'm stating the facts. And you are really short sighted if you think the sex tape is it. How about posing half or completely naked every time she can? Her failed marriages, one only for press? Her sisters and their out of wedlock revolving door of men and babies. I don't care if they're plaid, they're trash.

You still didn't look in the mirror and consider why you took this to the place of being about race. I can name off a long list of gorgeous POC, inside and out, that didn't have to resort to Kardashian tactics to be beautiful and/or famous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Kim is very talented, just not in the way you think. Her sense of the market and audience connection is unrivaled.

That you attribute any of this "talent" to Kim herself and not Kris Jenner is a clear sign of Kris' genius. She's the one whose "sense of market and audience connection is unrivaled."

THIS! Anyone thinking Kim or her sisters are some sort of mastermind are so fooled it's laughable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Kardashians are attractive.

Almost 100% would agree.

They just think the Kardashian’s do not deserve fame or are jealous of their success.

I don't agree with you. I think they look very fake and overdone and plastic. Personally, I don't find butt implants, lip injections, pounds of fake hair, etc. attractive. Their faces are so overdone they can't even make expressive faces properly.

I agree with PP. The level of hatred they inspire goes beyond thinking they’re fake or unattractive and straight into bitterness/jealousy territory. The lady upthread who called them pigs is an example. Why else would you use such an over the top insult for people you don’t even know?

Well Kim did make the family famous solely through having sex on camera.

I can only speak for myself, I just don't appreciate that these women have made a living on a hyper sexual image and NO talent. And yes I know some will say they're talented because they've made a lot of money, but they've also had a huge support system financially and PR-wise. They're a horrible example for young girls, women, and even to men on what they should be placing value on in a woman.

Tons of girls had sex on camera yet did not amount to anything. Don't fool yourself. If all it took to be famous was to have on camera...there'd be many more famous people.

Kim is very talented, just not in the way you think. Her sense of the market and audience connection is unrivaled.

+1. People hate her because she doesn’t have a traditionally white look, markets mostly to minorities, and is hugely popular. Mostly white women complain that she’s a horrible example for women, blah blah even though there are other women out there who have done similar things (like Paris Hilton). Miley Cyrus is just as “trashy” and doesn’t inspire the same level of hatred bc she is a regular white girl.

WOW, not only are you reaching, this is offensive. I'm the pp and it has NOTHING to do with race. I was speaking about the Kardashians as a whole and as an example of very fake, exaggerated "beauty." Lots of white women have done these trashy things, you're right. And they aren't good examples either.

Spend some time thinking about why you took this argument to that place, because it was the furthest thing from my mind when I posted it.

You need to spend some time thinking about why you’re so offended by my remarks and whether your own comments reveal unconscious bias. As another poster pointed out, the “fake, exaggerated beauty” features you mention with so much disgust are normal features for many poc. Other than Kim’s sex tape, I don’t see what else they’ve done that so trashy.

DP but why do you have to make it about race? Kim K and her family are pretty much known as being trash, they've made an image out of it. Google one of Kim's 5000 outfits with her private parts hanging out. She's a porn star with a much better manager LOL!

[Anonymous]

kardashinas are lilky white.

[Anonymous]

I like her hands the most.

[Anonymous]

SJP is skinny and rich so she’s got that going for her but I don’t see how anybody could objectively claim that she is beautiful.

Kim K is just grotesque.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:SJP is skinny and rich so she’s got that going for her but I don’t see how anybody could objectively claim that she is beautiful.

Kim K is just grotesque.

Slim is beautiful but skinny is not. Skinny women look like hags.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Have you googled her hands??!

She's very thin, and so it's not surprising to me that her hands are so veiny. However, those nails look like she bites them.