We are not rehashing 15 pages. All explanations were provided. The problem was that you refused to accept that the vast majority of 1.5 or 1.6 billions are peaceful. You refused to accept that reading the Quran in context of history is imperative. The typical Muslim does not study the Quran in context but they are required to. Therefore, others objected. You painted Islam with a broad brush and it made you look like an Islamophobe. |
No. That's not what happened, you know it, and so do other people who participated in those threads. A side question is why you think you can keep reinventing history for which there's an actual, verifiable, record. You made statements about women having equality, female captives having a great deal, converts outnumbering immigrants in the US, the good treatment of apostates, and much more. Several posters asked about these issues in the Quran and sharia. Newsflash: just because you are a Muslim doesn't mean the Quran and shariah don't exist. In fact, because you couldn't make the Quran and shariah go away, so you called everybody an Islamophobe and stomped off. Just like the Huffington article said you would. This feeds into that article's whole theme about whether being a Muslim requires that you take the Quran literally. |
|
PS. Since you keep insisting you're dealing with a single, monolithic, Islamophobe, who is apparently endowed with super-human powers to be on all threads at once, let me identify myself. You called me...
Angry bad cook with the spouse who wants to leave her, with the son who is failing school and who is into drugs and porn, and who wants desperately wants to convert to Islam but is afraid of the truth. Not to be confused with the different poster you called unemployed and stupid, or the poster you called a bad speller. I probably do fall into the category of the many posters you called Christian-evangelical-Crusader-Islamophobe. |
And you my dear, may be a stickler for facts but are not fit to interpret those facts, even anonymously on DCUM. The kind of errors you made here in either misinterpretation or intentional vilification of Islam fosters more bigotry towards Muslims. Maybe that was your agenda all along and you feign interest in this religion to advance hate.
The only mistake Muslima made was in using the word "equality" as she should have known it would be interpreted as the western idea of equality. Most Muslim women will tell you the justice they enjoy under Islam is interpreted by them as providing equality. Men have some greater rights but also much greater responsibilities. The Sharia is an imperfect creation. The translations of the Quran are inadequate. Abuse does occur. Reformation is needed, not to change Islam, but to provide historical context. You use these flaws to support the idea that Islam is a barbaric religion that oppresses women and condones violence. And for that you got spanked because it seemed pretty clear you had an agenda. I was not the one who started threads vilifying Christianity. I have respect for Christianity. But your islamiphobia did prompt me to challenge your biased generalizations and also to start new threads. Some yrs back, I was curious about Christianity. I was not interested in converting. I sought knowledge. After reading the Bible, I still sought further clarification. I did not get on DCUM or any blog to vilify Christianity, I called priests and clergymen. They were quite helpful. See the difference? You had an agenda and probably still do. |
Ali Rizvi? Seriously? He describes himself as an "Atheist Muslim", don't know what that means, but go figure..... |
Btw, I wrote this, was offline for some reason.... |
No, I am Sunni as well. Don't do anything special for Ashura, but have a nice dinner and spend time with family ![]() ![]() |
Reformatting my earlier post to make it clear to everyone how you define Islamophobe.
**** No, you made that up. I never, ever said the vast majority of Muslims are not peaceful. Your friend the moderator can verify. In fact I think the vast majority ARE peaceful. Ergo, I never painted anyone with a broad brush. Ergo, I am not an Islamophobe. Unless--according to one of your many other definitions of Islamophobia--it's Islamophobic to fail to agree that women's limited divorce, testimony and inheritance rights constitute "equal justice" for women and are in society's best interest. Or unless, according to another one of your definitions of Islamophobia, it was Islamophobic to participate among the many other posters who cited Quranic verses and shariah against your personal interpretations of divorce and other laws, or who challenged you over maybe 10 pages (ten pages!) to provide stats backing up your conversion claims. I'm definitely a stickler for cites, legal rulings and stats as a way to understand what's going on in the rest of the world. I don't trust you enough to take your word on the weather, at this point. Sorry. ****** And a few more points. I studied Islam with a world expert on Islam, who went on to be president of a major university in the Middle East. On the other hand, most of us don't trust you to interpret Islam as far as we can throw you. Let's look at your multiple lies (I haven't used that word so far, but I will now) on merely secular issues: - your attempts to spin conversations, - your insistence that you are arguing with a single person, - your nonsense about converts to Islam exceeding immigrants. Even though *your own numbers* showed that was a ridiculously false claim, you STILL insisted it was true for pages afterwards. (Unbelievable.) - when you told us you lived in Falls Church and the ride-on to the metro took two hours. It doesn't help that, besides being caught in lies, you also come off as having the maturity of a 12-year-old. Nor do you have the self restraint to drop issues you should be able to foresee you will lose. Sorry, but there are several of us who will challenge statements like "Islam gives a good deal to female captives" or "Islam provides equal rights to women" or "converts exceed immigrants." Signed, poster you called angry bad cook, with the spouse who wants to divorce her, the kid who is into drugs and porn, and who secretly wants to convert to Islam |
Ok, I have ignored you for a long time but you keep repeating the same thing over and over and use "equality" at each corner. So, let me be clear. Equality doesn't mean X=Y. Equality means that in the face of Divine Law, both men and women are equal, i-e Allah judge all of His servants according to their deeds, not according to their gender. Men & Women practice the 5 pillars of Islam the same way. There isn't a special Quran for men and a special Quran for females. Men and women have the same religious and moral duties and responsibilities. They both face the same consequences or rewards of their deeds. Both genders are entitled to equality before the law and courts of law. Justice is genderless. Now, I already know what you are going to come back with. But a man can have 4 wives, a man's testimony is worth more than a woman's , women inherit less, yadi yadi yada, We've debated those over 20 pages in different threads, no need to rehash them once more. If you didn't get it then, you won't it now. It should be added that from an Islamic perspective, the roles of men and women are complementary and cooperative rather than competitive. Their roles and responsibilities in life are different because of their physical and emotional differences. We have different demands, different responsibilities ect. Righteousness determines the value of humans in Allah's sight. It is not their gender or race, if you can't get that, well I can't help it. No need to have the same discussion with the same arguments 1000x, really! |
Really??? ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Let me be clear: I don't give a shit if there were many people posting. I suspect it was a small handful, with your mouth being the biggest. I.DO.NOT. GIVE.A.SHIT. You did not learn "with" a world class expert. You may have taken a college class. Your professor was not an Islamic scholar. Moreover, he did a disservice educating you about Islam because there are holes in your understanding. Who is he? Please tell me so that I can have real Islamic experts contact him. |
Hahaha Glad you're back, Muslima. Now I'm curious, who this world class expert on Islam was. Was it osama bin laden? |
No, here's what I'm going to come back with: The fault is yours, for using words like "equality" that, you must be aware, mean something completely, utterly, different to non-Muslim ears. And BTW, you do this again in the bolded passage above, when you say that this includes "legal equality" in an Islamic sense - but in fact this doesn't include the Western concepts of equality in the divorce courts, in terms of the worth of a woman's testimony in financial courts, or her inheritance rights in estate law. I don't know if you deliberately omitted to explain the difference between your concept of "equality" and the Western idea of "equality" that you must know your readers are using as a reference point. Perhaps you assumed an explanation wasn't necessary. However, are you really unable to see how your statements about "equality" would lead to 20 pages of clarification and quotes from the Quran and shariah, until we *finally* get to how your concept of "equality" differs from the Western idea of equality that everybody else here is using as a reference? And why are we Islamophobes, just because you force us engage you for 20 pages before you finally spill the beans on your definition of equality? These are some of the reasons we don't trust you or the other Muslim PP to "interpret" Islam for us. |
Beautifully put, Muslima. You need to write articles. Contact huffington post!!! |