Yep. This is why people send their unhooked kids to public schools. Grade deflation hurts college admissions. |
This article says otherwise: https://bethesdamagazine.com/2024/09/17/where-do-moco-students-attend-college/ Grade inflation in public schools actually hurts the strongest students by making it harder to distinguish themselves academically. It’s much harder to differentiate yourself when you’re 1 of 15 valedictorians. It’s easier when you attend a school like Sidwell or NCS and you’re the only student who graduated with a 4.0 (or even >3.98 GPA). |
Loudly wrong. Grades can differ widely in stem classes regardless or right/wrong answers. Test retakes, weighting scales, curved tests, difficulty of tests, grading for completion vs accuracy, etc. |
That story doesn’t say anything at all about grade inflation? |
It speaks to the PP’s erroneous hot take: “Yep. This is why people send their unhooked kids to public schools. Grade deflation hurts college admissions.” You’ll find no competitive advantage in moving your children to public school. They’ll have to work harder to differentiate themselves from the competition. |
Uh, no. That's not how grading works. |
Well, when you admit a class of kids who all had straight As and high standardized scores, and you know you cannot give them all straight As like they all used to have, you need to do gymnastics to make sure the distribution of grades looks reasonable to colleges. For one teacher that may mean a painful curve where 2 wrong is a C; for another it may be giving harder and harder questions so no one can get them all correct; for another it may be a hard pop quiz on the Monday after Prom to catch a few kids out; etc. I've heard teachers say at our school that if more than certain number of students are getting perfects scores on quizzes and tests, they aren't making it hard enough. That's how you get a class average over 1400 on the SAT and yet 25% of the class with multiple C grades. |
My kid is at TJ, but they have yet to report any "PhD level questions" on their tests... |
That’s because public school teachers have some degree of accountability which does not exist at private schools. At STA we have teachers who give 1/2 the class C’s by testing on material they haven’t taught. There’s no accountability for bad teaching or bad testing. What PP is referring to as PhD level problems are stupid questions that go way beyond what was covered in class that the boys are supposed to solve under timed test conditions. Students compensate for bad teaching by getting outside help. If you’re on FA and can’t afford it, you’re SOL. |
Explain? |
What TJ was is not what it is. My kid had an NIH based PhD teaching them and specifically told them what was coming at them was PhD level questions. True story. |
Sorry, what you stated is not the reality. SATs have nothing to do with course grades. The "gymnastics" teachers do is not about not giving students Cs, but to not mark students down for anything. Teachers do this because of parents' and administration's pressures to keep the kids' grades up. FWIW if the stdents at are all getting perfect scores, then you have to wonder 1) if the class has the right level of rigor 2) is there too much teaching to the test and handholding. |
1400 average seems low. A good high school has it at 1500 (TJ) or above. |
How do you explain how many kids get all 5s on APs with now studying and yet Bs in the classes? This happens frequently. |
Georgetown Prep. |