Supply vs demand and international students at elite colleges

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The national sentiment on this is moving with trump not against him.

As more US citizens realize what the international student numbers look like, expect any domestic opposition to this to fall away.


International students account for about 5% of total college students in the US. This doesn’t seem so high. I realise they are not evenly spread across colleges and their numbers are much higher at some of the most elite universities. Is that actually the issue? Would people be okay if 5% of students at each college were international?

By way of comparison, international students account for 21% of all students in Canada, 25% in the UK and 31% in Australia. Of course, the big advantage in those three countries is that they massively cross subsidise domestic students.



Yes it’s bc they are concentrated at the very best schools that are off limits to more and more Americans.

No one cares about the international # at JMU or VCU.
Anonymous
The problem is that shutting out international students will hurt financial aid. The international students are paying for the domestic students’ aid.
Anonymous
It’s time for these schools to lower their sky high prices that outstripped inflation and paid for numerous useless bureaucrats. Then maybe more Americans can afford it and we won’t rely on international students. If other countries can offer lower tuition to their students without international students so can the U.S.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The national sentiment on this is moving with trump not against him.

As more US citizens realize what the international student numbers look like, expect any domestic opposition to this to fall away.


there is no rational opposition.

help US citizens first.

someday Demcrats will become the party of workers again.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:All of these elite schools should have doubled enrollment years ago. The extreme selectivity is a turnoff, and is no longer helpful to their brands.


The small enrollment is part of its prestige. If Harvard had a 50% acceptance rate in this modern time would it be Harvard? That appeal would be gone for many who go to these schools FOR the eliteness. Harvard has a great international relations/poli sci/government program but so does GWU and Gettysburg. People aren’t clamoring to these schools in droves like Harvard. I don’t agree with the enrollment size but I understand it.

That's fine. But you can't perpetuate prestige on the backs of hard working Americans. Defund Harvard. Fund Texas A&M which educates 70000 versus Harvard's 1600.
jsteele
Site Admin Offline
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1275394.page

DC Urban Moms & Dads Administrator
http://twitter.com/jvsteele
https://mastodon.social/@jsteele
Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Go to: