Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Republicans groomed this man and were all too happy to use him to get their tax breaks and 25-year old FedSoc hacks lifetime seats on the judiciary. At some point their angry and populist base is going to wise up that AOC is not the reason they are over-leveraged, obese losers, and the guns will be out for them.

Republicans made the mess, they can clean it up. Take out their own garbage.

Joe Walsh says it here

and 35% or whatever have bought into it. The key - how do you deprogram what Stephanie Grisham has called "the crazies"?

they are all in bed together now

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Translation: “Dem voters should lie about who they are so they can interfere with another party’s primary system”.


Sounds about right for leftist “ethics”.

From the party that tried to overthrow a free and fair election because Papa Doc's fragile ego couldn't handle it. Please, spare us the lecture on ethics - you lost that moral high ground at least six years ago.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Translation: “Dem voters should lie about who they are so they can interfere with another party’s primary system”.


Sounds about right for leftist “ethics”.

From the party that tried to overthrow a free and fair election because Papa Doc's fragile ego couldn't handle it. Please, spare us the lecture on ethics - you lost that moral high ground at least six years ago.

So republicans had the moral high ground during the Obama presidency?

LOL, thanks for acknowledging that!

Anonymous wrote:What would OP think of a mass movement of republicans, coordinated on social media, to change their affiliation and flood in and vote in the democrat primaries, to try to elect a dem who had no appeal to actual dem voters?

I’m guessing that would be different. That would be wrong!

Anonymous wrote:Great idea.
So the republicans end up with universally popular moderate candidates
And the democrats ( because a large portion of the base can’t participate in the primary) end up with an unelectable further left candidate.
What a great idea for republicans: get the democrats to do all the work for them, and end up winning.
Sounds about right.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why can't Democrats register as Republicans (if requred) in certain states where there's an anti-Trump Republican incumbent (e.g. Romney, Murkowski, Cheney), vote in the Republican primaries to make sure the anti-Trump nominee wins. After this is done, at the general election, they can of course vote for whoever they want. I'm sure the Republicans may do the same but that should be OK with the Democratic party? Why is this not a strategy that they aren't pushing for? They don't even have to be secretive about it.

Would you sign an affidavit that swore under penalty of perjury that you would vote for the republican nominee, if they were the same candidate you voted for in the primary, in the general election ?


In other words, if you changed parties to vote for a Mitt Romney in the primary, and he won, would you still vote for Romney in the general election against whoever the democrat nominee is?

And if you didn’t, why not? And would you accept being convicted of perjury if you didn’t?

Anonymous wrote:What would OP think of a mass movement of republicans, coordinated on social media, to change their affiliation and flood in and vote in the democrat primaries, to try to elect a dem who had no appeal to actual dem voters?

I’m guessing that would be different. That would be wrong!

BlueFredneck wrote:If Dems are that serious, then they have to abandon R+10 and higher districts and states, and support Republicans who'd support a proper investigation into 1/6 and maybe a few other VERY basic things.