Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You have to "want" each other or at least make a show of wanting each other. No one gets dibs or gets saddled with initiating sex. It's not just one party's responsibility.

OP, does he EVER initiate? Why would he say he wants to be the only person "wanted" what about you?

OP here. This is a hard question. He used to initiate it. He said he stopped b/c he is sick of getting turned down. But, it is not as though I'm lying in bed and rolling over on him.. it's just that he was initiating sex at times when our kid was running around the living room or something - or other times where it would just be totally impractical to throw down.

And I tried to designate a day of the week like another poster suggested (Sunday nights), but I got flack for that b/c he said it made him feel like me having sex w/ him was a just another chore of mine to be done. I tried to explain that I wanted to designate a time b/c, w/ my hectic world (I'm a lawyer and my hourse can make life a little crazy), it made sex a priority. But, he still gets pissed if I try to set a day of the week.

I don't know what the hell to do.... I think this is potentially his self esteem issue. I'm trying to figure out if I've contributed to it (probably) and how best to resolve it. Which seems hard to do when my sex drive isn't that fantastic anyway, and the only way it really gets moving is to see him being strong and confident. Dammit.

Anonymous wrote:unfashionable, poor, rube here. Who is TSFG?

Anonymous wrote:Why is smiley face guy on this thread? He just gets creepier and creepier. Does he have a job?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Too funny that people convince themselves that those idiotic labels matter, just like they pretend that thy always wear cute little sundresses to chase kids at the playground.

It's not about the labels - people who don't follow fashion (i.e. most people) don't even know which labels are considered good. It is always on the lower (cheaper) end that logos and such are most prominent. I have people ask me all the time where I bought designer stuff (that they can't afford) because they don't recognize the designers. They just like the way it looks but don't understand that those looks cost.

Poor little me, I just don't UNDERSTAND that I can't look good without spending THOUSANDS of dollars on one outfit. Woe is me. My life is ruined.

One bag <> one outfit. From that comment alone, it's clear that you in fact don't look good. Not the end of the world, though, just stop imaging you do.

Anonymous wrote:

ThatSmileyFaceGuy wrote:If it makes me a loser to think it's silly to spend 250 on a paper bag with someones name on it. Something that probably cost them 5 bucks to make, Then call me a loser.

You are a loser for posting in a fashion forum about women's purses. You are a loser for endlessly referencing some useless (and pretty cheap) bag that nobody here ever considered nor recommended. Not every attempt by even a famous designer is a gem, everybody knows this. But what you don't understand is why is that. You, in your boundless cluelessness, think that it's enough to slap a label on whatever crappy bag and it will sell. It is not so.

Designing is hard and it takes a lot of talent to think and make a great bag. Because of that, just like in everything else, in general expensive bags (items) are better than cheap bags (items). Just because you see no difference does not mean that there is no difference, just that you don't know where to look. I don't see a difference among various screwdrivers but if someone with interest and knowledge tells me that there is a difference then I accept it, rather than telling him that he is a fool for wanting something that costs $15 when $1 is just as good.

Btw, which car do you drive? Just curious.

Anonymous wrote:

ThatSmileyFaceGuy wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only $250, but looks like much less!

http://www.ln-cc.com/invt/jil0110027car

This one is already sold out!

250 for a paper bag. You people can't be serious.

Stop trolling. Nobody suggested that bag - it was posted by some cheapo convinced her $50 bag looks great.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only $250, but looks like much less!

http://www.ln-cc.com/invt/jil0110027car

This one is already sold out!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Speaking of which, I bought guys wranglers the other day since I needed work jeans. The pockets work! Real live functional pockets! Don't give a damn wha they look like...functional work clothing rocks.

Why are you reading the fashion forum?