Anonymous wrote:Hey Christopher, how many OOB students has TEC taken for prek and kindergarten the past few years?
Anonymous wrote:Great work Christopher!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can the interviews be posted someplace other than DCUM too? I'd be very happy to share with folks but feel funny about leading them to this thread that can be full of opinion). Thanks so much for doing this!
The videos are available at this website: http://dcnorthstar.com/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought it was because the current person holding seat didn’t announce she was retiring until after the deadline. Anyhow, Rhonda Henderson has my vote!
Yes, the previous Ward 4 State Board member Lannette Woodruff resigned her post effective July 31st which was too late for new candidates to complete required paperwork to appear on the ballot for Nov. 6th. Nobody goofed, it’s just an unfortunate situation of bad timing. Agreed that it will probably lead to lower turnout. The last time there was a special election to fill a vacant seat on the State Board of Education, it was in 2014 for the Ward 8 seat. The winner of that contest had 813 votes compared to 733 for 2nd place. Especially with 4 candidates in the mix, every vote counts for this special election, so be sure to tell your Ward 4 friends and neighbors to learn about the candidates and vote!
Anonymous wrote:What about a video from Frazier OLeary?
Anonymous wrote:
But let me be really clear: I don't think the real problem is lack of name-brand programs like PLTW. I think the problem is that the majority of the students are below grade level. That's a problem for those students, and it will also make the school struggle to attract high-performing students. So in not proposing any plan to deal with this problem, they are starting off in a way that does not build confidence (in my opinion at least). The same goes for Coolidge-- health sciences and journalism are all well and good, but if most of the kids are below grade level, those programs are not going to be attractive to high-performing students, or effective in being the programs that they're supposed to be. I'm not asking for a plan that is being implemented right this second. But I am asking for a realistic acknowledgement that the academic performance and the behavior of the students is the real problem, and a plan for dealing with it. If it's too much for the middle school team to handle right now, how about the elementary schools? They have just been relieved of three grade levels, so improving the performance of their students should be a project they can tackle.
Anonymous wrote:Christopher, thanks for all your great work. I appreciate being kept informed.
I am wondering if there is any plan for dealing with academic performance which is the root of the issue here, is it not? Many 6th graders enter the school scoring a 1 or 2 on the PARCC. What specifically is the plan for addressing that? Your blog says "interestinf and rigorous curricula" but what exactly does that mean, and how will students be brought up to grade level?
Anonymous wrote:What is the point of this? Is it for kids that are accelerated? What happens when they end up back in their mediocre DCPS without gifted programming? Or is the point to just get kids to grade level?