You have no right at all to permanently brand an unconsenting child's body for your own religious reasons. That's completely the opposite of freedom of religion. There are basically no benefits at all to circumcision and the negatives vastly outweight it. It became popularized because it prevented masturbation and reduced sexual pleasure (there's plenty of jewish literature on this). Then doctors realized they could make a ton of money off of it, so they started dong biased study after biased study fishing for medical reasons to justify doing it.

"Well I had my dick mutilated as a child. Instead of saving my child from it, I am going to mutilate their dick as well" <<logic not even once?

However jewish you want to be, you have no right at all to mutilate a child's genitals, removing an important erogenous zone from his body without any consent at all.

There is no other surgery performed that removes a healthy body part, that people claim is beneficial. Circumcision is the one apparent exception, according to american doctors. Do you think that's just by chance, or do you think it's because of money, biased studies, and retarded conclusions drawn by them for monetary purposes? Removing healthy body parts does NOT improve your health.