Is Brianne Nadeau running for re-election?

[Anonymous]

I heard that the new leader of GGW, Chelsea Allinger, was going to announce?

[Anonymous]

Brianne is useless so I'm excited about voting for someone else!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Brianne is useless so I'm excited about voting for someone else!

I'd really like us to move on from Brianne. She has been a disaster.

[Anonymous]

Not going to happen. Like Jim Graham before her she’ll serve forever. She’s embarrassingly inept.

[Anonymous]

20-30 shots last evening at 1 am in Columbia Heights. Thank god we have the violence interrupters. Imagine where we’d be without them?

[Anonymous]

I emailed her head of constituent services a week ago about getting help to resolve a trash situation in our alley. Some jacka$$ illegally dumped a bunch of furniture and it’s now blocking a multi-use area for trash and recycling. I tried 311 to help pick up some of it, but it’s still a mess.

Crickets from Brianne’s office.

[Anonymous]

Guess she’ll say she was for the new Banneker School before she voted against it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I emailed her head of constituent services a week ago about getting help to resolve a trash situation in our alley. Some jacka$$ illegally dumped a bunch of furniture and it’s now blocking a multi-use area for trash and recycling. I tried 311 to help pick up some of it, but it’s still a mess.

Crickets from Brianne’s office.

That would be because she doesn't care. You're merely in her way as she aims to redistribute privilege.

[Anonymous]

We're moving. So sad I won't get vote for somebody else. I've never felt she sees her job as helping her constituents but as promoting her own personal agenda. I find this pretty offensive. Maybe I am in the minority though, because she got relected.

[Anonymous]

She will be a big player once statehood becomes reality

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We're moving. So sad I won't get vote for somebody else. I've never felt she sees her job as helping her constituents but as promoting her own personal agenda. I find this pretty offensive. Maybe I am in the minority though, because she got relected.

You are right that she is using the office to promote her personal agenda. She sees her constituents as merely a means to her own end at best, and as obstacles to her program at worst. She is definitely not here to make Ward 1 more livable for Ward 1 tax payers.

The final straw for me was her support for excluding our zip codes from timely COVID vaccine access. That's it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She will be a big player once statehood becomes reality

I was very much in favor of Statehood until the city council became dominated by immoderates.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She will be a big player once statehood becomes reality

I was very much in favor of Statehood until the city council became dominated by immoderates.

I never understand how people can look at DC city government and think “yeah, let’s give these people more power.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We're moving. So sad I won't get vote for somebody else. I've never felt she sees her job as helping her constituents but as promoting her own personal agenda. I find this pretty offensive. Maybe I am in the minority though, because she got relected.

She only got reelected because two opponents split the vote. One strong opponent would demolish her in the primary.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I heard that the new leader of GGW, Chelsea Allinger, was going to announce?

GGW is one of Nadeau's biggest cheerleaders. Why would they run someone against her?