How can I find out which schools have current Covid case for aps?

[Anonymous]

I don’t see it in the dashboard. Thanks.

[Anonymous]

It is on the dashboard you just have to scroll to the bottom of the page where it has the student and teacher exclusions.

https://apsva.co1.qualtrics.com/reports/RC/public/YXBzdmEtNjA0MjliZDQzYTI2NjAwMDBmOWFmN2RmLVVSXzJ6QkpuNWJ5ZXo1bGVGWg==

[Anonymous]

Thanks so much. Wow a bunch at McKinley.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thanks so much. Wow a bunch at McKinley.

Not surprising. The families in my neighborhood stopped taking COVID seriously last summer and never changed course.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Thanks so much. Wow a bunch at McKinley.

Watch the dates and clusters. Looks like potentially one cluster on the 3rd/4th based on time stamps, then another positive case on the 8th/9th with a number of other close contacts then. What we can't tell is whether these are clusters in a homeroom that were quarantined due to close contact or a few families that were exposed to one another outside of school in a pod or a group get together. Similarly the cluster at Barrett where you have two positive and another five or so close contacts. Or the two virtual learners at Williamsburg on the same day, one is positive and one is a close contact, I'd assume those are siblings.

Figuring out which ones stay self contained versus additional spread where those close contacts become positive will be an indicator.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Thanks so much. Wow a bunch at McKinley.

Watch the dates and clusters. Looks like potentially one cluster on the 3rd/4th based on time stamps, then another positive case on the 8th/9th with a number of other close contacts then. What we can't tell is whether these are clusters in a homeroom that were quarantined due to close contact or a few families that were exposed to one another outside of school in a pod or a group get together. Similarly the cluster at Barrett where you have two positive and another five or so close contacts. Or the two virtual learners at Williamsburg on the same day, one is positive and one is a close contact, I'd assume those are siblings.

Figuring out which ones stay self contained versus additional spread where those close contacts become positive will be an indicator.

Why do they bother with the virtual kids? It seems like that information just muddles the data and makes it harder to sort out trends.

[Anonymous]

I think they want the virtual kids because it is a useful comparison - kids not in schools can catch covid just because levels of community transmission, just like kids in schools can do so.

[Anonymous]

Some virtual kids are doing school sports. Wonder if it will still list them as virtual or sports?

[Anonymous]

There was also a event outbreak in girls travel soccer. So may have r been connected to that? But I have no idea

[Anonymous]

I don’t think elementary kids are involved in school sports... it does kind of demonstrate that transmission risk is not significantly different between virtual and in person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There was also a event outbreak in girls travel soccer. So may have r been connected to that? But I have no idea

What year? Arlington Travel would have kids across schools and even into Vienna/McLean/Fairfax.

[Anonymous]

Travel soccer positive cases were before the return-to-school date, and as far as we've heard, it wasn't an outbreak - just one positive case that then required 14-day quarantine for teams.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Travel soccer positive cases were before the return-to-school date, and as far as we've heard, it wasn't an outbreak - just one positive case that then required 14-day quarantine for teams.

I’ve been coaching since covid “happened”. Only one of my players had covid because she’s reckless with her ignorance. Other than that nothing to be paranoid of

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Travel soccer positive cases were before the return-to-school date, and as far as we've heard, it wasn't an outbreak - just one positive case that then required 14-day quarantine for teams.

I’ve been coaching since covid “happened”. Only one of my players had covid because she’s reckless with her ignorance. Other than that nothing to be paranoid of

Travel parent here, since July, two scares that interrupted practice/games but no positive cases.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don’t think elementary kids are involved in school sports... it does kind of demonstrate that transmission risk is not significantly different between virtual and in person.

True, what I meant was I wonder what the reporting will say. Will it keep that student listed as virtual, or will it specifically indicate it was an athletic related occurrence?