Why is DCUM so obsessed with small liberal arts colleges?

Anonymous
Most graduates of SLACs have pretty dismal earnings compared to their Ivy/Public University peers. So why are SLACs throw around here so often? I see a lot of people recommend random schools like Grinnell but why would you send your kid there for a pretty hefty sum when they could go to a state flagship and be in either a better or similar position?

Source:

https://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-Salaries_for_Colleges_by_Type-sort.html
Anonymous
So they can be in a bubble with other wealthy white people, of course. That is not offered at the state flagship, sweetie.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:So they can be in a bubble with other wealthy white people, of course. That is not offered at the state flagship, sweetie.


If you join Greek life you can do just that...
Anonymous
Not everyone wants to go to a large state school.
Anonymous
Some kids don't want to go to a huge school and will do better in a school with close access to professors and smaller classes.
Anonymous
If you know your parental connections are going to get your kids those first internships and jobs, and thus those top salaries, you get to pick what’s the best fit for your kids.
Anonymous
Because their kids can’t get into Ivies, and they think more expensive things are better.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If you know your parental connections are going to get your kids those first internships and jobs, and thus those top salaries, you get to pick what’s the best fit for your kids.


This was probably intended to be snarky, but I actually think it’s true.
Anonymous
The earnings in that link don't look dismal. What are you seeing?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The earnings in that link don't look dismal. What are you seeing?


OP here, Grinnell’s average salary ten years out from graduation is around $77K which is quite concerning. Same thing with Skidmore and other selective, but not too selective, LACs.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If you know your parental connections are going to get your kids those first internships and jobs, and thus those top salaries, you get to pick what’s the best fit for your kids.


This was probably intended to be snarky, but I actually think it’s true.


OP here, that’s what I was thinking too but the link shows that the “top” salaries don’t really go to Grinnell/Oberlin/Skidmore/SLAC grads. So that doesn’t really make sense.
Anonymous
Is salary the only measure of a life worth living?

Are you the Dartmouth mom? Just wanted to start a thread but knew you couldn’t work the “daughter not interested in STEM” angle yet again?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Is salary the only measure of a life worth living?

Are you the Dartmouth mom? Just wanted to start a thread but knew you couldn’t work the “daughter not interested in STEM” angle yet again?


Obviously not, but I just wanted to know why DCUM families would throw around that much money when the earning potential is so low (and at 32, most are probably married and having kids).
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If you know your parental connections are going to get your kids those first internships and jobs, and thus those top salaries, you get to pick what’s the best fit for your kids.


This was probably intended to be snarky, but I actually think it’s true.


OP here, that’s what I was thinking too but the link shows that the “top” salaries don’t really go to Grinnell/Oberlin/Skidmore/SLAC grads. So that doesn’t really make sense.


First, I didn’t mean it snarky at all. My kids go to a private K-12 and I know full well how the world really works for the privileged. Which is also the flaw in OP’s reasoning. There’s the DCUM set Grinnell kids, who already have their meal ticket when they show up on campus, and then there’s the local Midwestern Grinnell kids, who go on to make $25k a year as editor in chief of a local newspaper. The statistics aren’t telling you anything helpful here about the logic of the well-connected.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Most graduates of SLACs have pretty dismal earnings compared to their Ivy/Public University peers. So why are SLACs throw around here so often? I see a lot of people recommend random schools like Grinnell but why would you send your kid there for a pretty hefty sum when they could go to a state flagship and be in either a better or similar position?

Source:

https://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/info-Salaries_for_Colleges_by_Type-sort.html


The mid career salaries on your chart make liberal arts look a lot better than you imply
post reply Forum Index » College and University Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: