Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Please please please find out that Les Wexner gave Jim Jordan a lot of money for his cooperation!!!

Oooh timely… speaking of Wexner and Jordan

Imagine being a teenage girl and having to touch these wrinkly old men? They were all old and homely, not one decent guy in the group. Not one anonymous call about teens having sex with old white men on a private island. No one with a conscience-wow.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here we go… finally getting to why Epstein got the sweetheart deal in the first place.

Julie K Brown has been relentlessly reporting on this when very few would. Recommend her substack.

+1 She’s the whole reason any of this is happening. Not exaggerating.

Who should be charged? You do know that you need proof--or, more evidence than "xx says?"

Do I think there are likely guilty people? Yes. Do I think there is enough to convict? Probably not.

As for the women at the hearing. None of those women was a child at the time they were involved in Epstein shenanigans.

Not sure what post you meant to respond to but even the publicly released files have evidence of crimes. BTW, it’s illegal to traffic adults too.

Epstein is dead. Ghislaine is in jail. So, who do you intend to charge? You need clear evidence. It cannot be just suspicion.

There's a vast network. Maxwell wasn't the only person there - Epstein had others arranging "massages" and logistics involving the victims. The rest of the network involved in trafficking, and those who took advantage of the girls all need to be held accountable. You seem deeply out of touch acting like there's nothing left to do with Epstein dead and Maxwell in prison.

[Anonymous]

This is phenomenal work - the documents have been ingested, indexed, cross referenced, mapped into social network graphs, timelines built out and so on.

Discussion:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/comments/1r3joqr/i_mapped_every_connection_in_the_epstein_files_it/

Data: https://epsteinexposed.com/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here we go… finally getting to why Epstein got the sweetheart deal in the first place.

Julie K Brown has been relentlessly reporting on this when very few would. Recommend her substack.

+1 She’s the whole reason any of this is happening. Not exaggerating.

Who should be charged? You do know that you need proof--or, more evidence than "xx says?"

Do I think there are likely guilty people? Yes. Do I think there is enough to convict? Probably not.

As for the women at the hearing. None of those women was a child at the time they were involved in Epstein shenanigans.

Not sure what post you meant to respond to but even the publicly released files have evidence of crimes. BTW, it’s illegal to traffic adults too.

Epstein is dead. Ghislaine is in jail. So, who do you intend to charge? You need clear evidence. It cannot be just suspicion.

There's a vast network. Maxwell wasn't the only person there - Epstein had others arranging "massages" and logistics involving the victims. The rest of the network involved in trafficking, and those who took advantage of the girls all need to be held accountable. You seem deeply out of touch acting like there's nothing left to do with Epstein dead and Maxwell in prison.

No. Not out of touch, but close enough to prosecutors to know that you need evidence and proof. I don't question there are people who are guilty--but convicting them is a whole other issue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is phenomenal work - the documents have been ingested, indexed, cross referenced, mapped into social network graphs, timelines built out and so on.

Discussion:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/comments/1r3joqr/i_mapped_every_connection_in_the_epstein_files_it/

Data: https://epsteinexposed.com/

Wow, that is spectacular! What an undertaking!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Anybody who continues to [/b]believe [b]Epstein killed himself is a fool. That man had so much dirt on the most powerful people in the world. Correction officers are lowly paid and the right one will take a bribe to leave a cell door open for the right price. Epstein was murdered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:More stuff just laying around in plain sight

In unearthed footage, rapper Uncle Luke if 2 Live Crew describes his experience at a Trump Mar-a-Lago party in the 90s.

Host: So women just naked in rooms with no music?

Uncle Luke: When I start looking at some of these girls’ faces, I was like, “Man, these girls don't look like they're old enough.” ... I was like, “I can't be up in here. I gotta go. If I'm going to jail, then somebody's going to extort me.” ... So you got a whole bunch of these women running around, some women look too young ... Were they old enough to be enjoying themselves? I don't know.

Host: Was there sex?

Uncle Luke: Of course there was sex.

Host: You're saying that all this was going on and you weren't clear as to whether these were adults?

Uncle Luke: I wasn't clear whether or not they were adults. And I wasn't clear whether or not I wanted to be in that kind of environment with some of these other things that was going on.

From the man who wrote "face down, ass up. that's the way I like to..."

Jeez, if Luke from 2LiveCrew thought things were sketchy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here we go… finally getting to why Epstein got the sweetheart deal in the first place.

Julie K Brown has been relentlessly reporting on this when very few would. Recommend her substack.

+1 She’s the whole reason any of this is happening. Not exaggerating.

Who should be charged? You do know that you need proof--or, more evidence than "xx says?"

Do I think there are likely guilty people? Yes. Do I think there is enough to convict? Probably not.

As for the women at the hearing. None of those women was a child at the time they were involved in Epstein shenanigans.

Not sure what post you meant to respond to but even the publicly released files have evidence of crimes. BTW, it’s illegal to traffic adults too.

Epstein is dead. Ghislaine is in jail. So, who do you intend to charge? You need clear evidence. It cannot be just suspicion.

There's a vast network. Maxwell wasn't the only person there - Epstein had others arranging "massages" and logistics involving the victims. The rest of the network involved in trafficking, and those who took advantage of the girls all need to be held accountable. You seem deeply out of touch acting like there's nothing left to do with Epstein dead and Maxwell in prison.

Those personal assistants and schedulers though, they were unindicted, no idea if they were promised immunity, they never once SAW a single thing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here we go… finally getting to why Epstein got the sweetheart deal in the first place.

Julie K Brown has been relentlessly reporting on this when very few would. Recommend her substack.

+1 She’s the whole reason any of this is happening. Not exaggerating.

Who should be charged? You do know that you need proof--or, more evidence than "xx says?"

Do I think there are likely guilty people? Yes. Do I think there is enough to convict? Probably not.

As for the women at the hearing. None of those women was a child at the time they were involved in Epstein shenanigans.

Not sure what post you meant to respond to but even the publicly released files have evidence of crimes. BTW, it’s illegal to traffic adults too.

Epstein is dead. Ghislaine is in jail. So, who do you intend to charge? You need clear evidence. It cannot be just suspicion.

There's a vast network. Maxwell wasn't the only person there - Epstein had others arranging "massages" and logistics involving the victims. The rest of the network involved in trafficking, and those who took advantage of the girls all need to be held accountable. You seem deeply out of touch acting like there's nothing left to do with Epstein dead and Maxwell in prison.

No. Not out of touch, but close enough to prosecutors to know that you need evidence and proof. I don't question there are people who are guilty--but convicting them is a whole other issue.

Maybe we can do with them what we're doing with all those people that are locked up in concentration camps. Lock them up first, ask questions later.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I had an epiphony about DEI and JE. Merit never existed. DEI created a system where an individual had to prove that they were qualified. Regular people fell for the lie that DEI needed to go away so that we could get back to a merit system that NEVER ACTUALLY EXISTED. What JE files let us see, is that the rich secret society of people like to make the rules that benefit them. Think about this. Women get 2% of venture capital. A tiny program for black women was eliminated b/c it "excluded" white men and women. But in the files we find out that rich people just hook each other up. You need $100m? Meet my banker at JP Morgan and it's done. There is no such thing as merit. It's called your relationships and if you aren't in the club, you are screwed. DEI made them open up the club and they didn't like it. It created merit.

That’s why DEI is stupid because it’s really about money and not skin color.

DEI was about women, not just race.

Sure but a white man from a poor family is not given any favors by people like JE just because they have white skin. You need to be a billionaire in order to join that club.

No. Epstein and his cronies were all Jewish supremacists who didn’t even consider themselves white. They called non-Jew white people goy cattle and blacks the n-word.

Is Steve Bannon Jewish? You need to stop with the antisemitism. Btw, Steve Bannon referred to wealthy white southerners as “crackers”

[Anonymous]

Top republicans are complaining if everyone in the Epstein files resigned, they’d have like 3 people left in their party.

Make it so!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here we go… finally getting to why Epstein got the sweetheart deal in the first place.

Julie K Brown has been relentlessly reporting on this when very few would. Recommend her substack.

+1 She’s the whole reason any of this is happening. Not exaggerating.

Who should be charged? You do know that you need proof--or, more evidence than "xx says?"

Do I think there are likely guilty people? Yes. Do I think there is enough to convict? Probably not.

As for the women at the hearing. None of those women was a child at the time they were involved in Epstein shenanigans.

Not sure what post you meant to respond to but even the publicly released files have evidence of crimes. BTW, it’s illegal to traffic adults too.

Epstein is dead. Ghislaine is in jail. So, who do you intend to charge? You need clear evidence. It cannot be just suspicion.

There's a vast network. Maxwell wasn't the only person there - Epstein had others arranging "massages" and logistics involving the victims. The rest of the network involved in trafficking, and those who took advantage of the girls all need to be held accountable. You seem deeply out of touch acting like there's nothing left to do with Epstein dead and Maxwell in prison.

Those personal assistants and schedulers though, they were unindicted, no idea if they were promised immunity, they never once SAW a single thing?

Exactly. And not just them but also the professors, doctors, customs brokers, and USVI muckety mucks.

Speaking of which, why is anybody covering for the Caribbean Eleanor Holmes? She should be the first to testify. How did she meet him and when did they start texting each other.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here we go… finally getting to why Epstein got the sweetheart deal in the first place.

Julie K Brown has been relentlessly reporting on this when very few would. Recommend her substack.

+1 She’s the whole reason any of this is happening. Not exaggerating.

Who should be charged? You do know that you need proof--or, more evidence than "xx says?"

Do I think there are likely guilty people? Yes. Do I think there is enough to convict? Probably not.

As for the women at the hearing. None of those women was a child at the time they were involved in Epstein shenanigans.

Gross. Expect more. Do better!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Here we go… finally getting to why Epstein got the sweetheart deal in the first place.

Julie K Brown has been relentlessly reporting on this when very few would. Recommend her substack.

+1 She’s the whole reason any of this is happening. Not exaggerating.

Who should be charged? You do know that you need proof--or, more evidence than "xx says?"

Do I think there are likely guilty people? Yes. Do I think there is enough to convict? Probably not.

As for the women at the hearing. None of those women was a child at the time they were involved in Epstein shenanigans.

Not sure what post you meant to respond to but even the publicly released files have evidence of crimes. BTW, it’s illegal to traffic adults too.

Epstein is dead. Ghislaine is in jail. So, who do you intend to charge? You need clear evidence. It cannot be just suspicion.

There's a vast network. Maxwell wasn't the only person there - Epstein had others arranging "massages" and logistics involving the victims. The rest of the network involved in trafficking, and those who took advantage of the girls all need to be held accountable. You seem deeply out of touch acting like there's nothing left to do with Epstein dead and Maxwell in prison.

No. Not out of touch, but close enough to prosecutors to know that you need evidence and proof. I don't question there are people who are guilty--but convicting them is a whole other issue.

Yes, lots of guilty people - yet Todd Blanche, Pam Bondi, Kash Patel and others are pretending there aren't any other guilty individuals, and that there's nothing to investigate, no further crimes, there will be no prosecution. Doesn't that bother you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Erika Kirk, groomer?

So shocking.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/lifestyle/lifestyle-buzz/erika-kirk-hit-with-new-grooming-claim-over-alleged-messages-to-15-year-old/ar-AA1W8SFc

I learned about her orphanage or children's org in Romania (if i remember correctly, it was in Eastern Europe). She's sketchy AF, and I wouldn't be surprised at all if she was involved in the trafficking. Her history is very sketchy.