Roe v Wade struck down

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Childless politicians being the face of pro-choice is really bad optics. AOC is nearly 33 years old, unmarried and childless; she does not comprehend what she is fighting for. If you are pro-choice, that's fine, but you ought to seek leaders with children to fight for it and be the face of it.

m

Why? Do childless women not get a choice?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe it's because I spent many years in a progressive EU country where abortion is restricted to the first trimester without much ado or angst, I really can't bring myself to care too much. Most of you live in states where abortion will continue to be legal. It does seem to be the compromise way forward. Red states restrict abortion, making them happy. Blue states keep abortion legal to the last day, making them happy.

Maybe you're just entitled.

Poor women in red states might want to move to blue states, but they haven't the means to do so. Why don't you care about them too? They are the ones who are going to die from backalley abortions, from sepsis from miscarriages, from extreme poverty when forced to give birth to more children they can't afford.

Honestly, women’s healthcare in every state will be affected by this. Who will want to be an OBGYn in the face of a patchwork of state laws on this? This ruling is just … I just don’t even have the words today for how terrible it is.

[Anonymous]

Our state, our choice.

I am proud that we have chosen life in TN.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Childless politicians being the face of pro-choice is really bad optics. AOC is nearly 33 years old, unmarried and childless; she does not comprehend what she is fighting for. If you are pro-choice, that's fine, but you ought to seek leaders with children to fight for it and be the face of it.

Uterus-less politicians making the choice for people with uteruses is even worse. You should seek out politicians that have uteruses.

[Anonymous]

Childless men and women do not understand life. Neither should be the face of an abortion movement, on either side. Bring a baby into the world, THEN get back to me on how eager you are to end millions of lives.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Maybe it's because I spent many years in a progressive EU country where abortion is restricted to the first trimester without much ado or angst, I really can't bring myself to care too much. Most of you live in states where abortion will continue to be legal. It does seem to be the compromise way forward. Red states restrict abortion, making them happy. Blue states keep abortion legal to the last day, making them happy.

It's convenient how you're ignoring the fact that in progressive EU countries, abortions are covered as healthcare, abortion providers are far more accessible than they are in most of the U.S., and there are far fewer legal hurdles to obtaining first-trimester abortions in the U.S. And after the first trimester, the requirements for getting a medically necessary abortion are much lower than in the U.S. If healthcare in the U.S. looked anything like it does in progressive EU countries, this would largely be a non-issue here too.

Also, even though I live in a state where abortion will continue to be legal, I actually give a damn about people other than myself and therefore actually give a damn about all of the women in red states who didn't vote for this but will suffer the consequences.

You should try giving a damn about people other than yourself sometime. It's not as easy as caring only about yourself, but you'll be a much better person for it.

[Anonymous]

Another outcome will be women protecting their rapist's identity not to share with him a child custody. What an ugly turn in this country.

Republicans, you are literally ruining lives of so many girls and women in this country. This is cruel and this is on you. Shame on you, Republicans. We're disgusted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Our state, our choice.

I am proud that we have chosen life in TN.

Oh great more meth addicted people in the world- cause you won’t actually take care of the people, just the fetuses.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Childless politicians being the face of pro-choice is really bad optics. AOC is nearly 33 years old, unmarried and childless; she does not comprehend what she is fighting for. If you are pro-choice, that's fine, but you ought to seek leaders with children to fight for it and be the face of it.

Why is this an issue. Is this a another “motherhood is magical” thing? Because she can certainly comprehend that she wants to make her own choices for her life without being married with a child.

What a stupid post.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Childless men and women do not understand life. Neither should be the face of an abortion movement, on either side. Bring a baby into the world, THEN get back to me on how eager you are to end millions of lives.

When I had a difficult pregnancy and childbirth, I became even more pro-choice. Sounds like you don’t talk to many women.

I would not hesitate to have an abortion at this point in my life. I’m done having kids, and can’t risk it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:These justices should be denied service everywhere-restaurants, airplanes, kids activities.

+1
They should be made to feel unwelcome everywhere for the rest of their lives.

You are the type of people who would kill babies. Gross. There are those of us who will salute them wherever they go.

You're going to salute justices? If I ever see Kavanaugh walking with his girls or heading into the CC Lounge I will be hurling insults.

Well, then you'll be just as bad as they are.

Please use your energy to get out the vote for Democrats in November!!

Kav has protection, and they will arrest you for assault. Don't waste your time on him. He's a loser, not qualified to be on the SCOTUS. He was put there by the conservatives using Trump to do their bidding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Another outcome will be women protecting their rapist's identity not to share with him a child custody. What an ugly turn in this country.

Republicans, you are literally ruining lives of so many girls and women in this country. This is cruel and this is on you. Shame on you, Republicans. We're disgusted.

Oh god, how awful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Barrett, Thomas and Alito will all burn in hell for the number of deaths they will cause with this ruling.

63 million aborted babies prior to their decision. Many people disagree with your opinion.

But the ones that get mowed down by your AR 15s is just God's will, right?


You pro forced birthers have revealed yourself, nobody believes your empty words about babies anymore.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Our state, our choice.

I am proud that we have chosen life in TN.

Oh great more meth addicted people in the world- cause you won’t actually take care of the people, just the fetuses.

I'm not an abortion or political scholar, but don't pro-choice argue banning abortion has a much broader impact than just forcing more [poor/unwanted] babies into the world? I believe they argue abortion is a negative sin that casts a dark cloud of society and brings down society overall. It's much broader than your theoretical [more] welfare babies with drug addict parents. They also argue it makes people more responsible for their actions? More selective about sexual partners; less promiscuity? Things like that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Our state, our choice.

I am proud that we have chosen life in TN.

Oh great more meth addicted people in the world- cause you won’t actually take care of the people, just the fetuses.

Isn't TN last in the country in education?