Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump called early on:

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/09/trump-jeffrey-epstein-ghislaine-maxwell-palm-beach-police.html

You can see Trump set a trap.

He will spring the good stuff right before the midterms for the maximum land mine.

Yes. This has been discussed today. It doesn't mean that he wasn't involved in the abuse, early, often, and in other settings as well. We know this.

It also doesn't mean he was. What are you basing that on, other than hopium?

Keep your head in the sand, roastie.

I am actually be serious. Accusing someone of pedophilia, trafficking, etc. is a very serious thing and really shouldn't be done without real evidence. Is there actual evidence, even circumstantial, that Trump himself was involved in the Epstein-related crimes?

Trump derangement syndrome is real, it’s just the exact opposite of what maga thinks it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Best to hold the good stuff till right before the midterms for maximum punishment

Nothing says these men with perverted tastes are not still raping nine year olds. We need to prosecute ASAP. Save the next girl.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Trump called early on:

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/09/trump-jeffrey-epstein-ghislaine-maxwell-palm-beach-police.html

In 2006. But was at an Epstein party in 2017. Try again, dolt.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Turns out Epstein ordered 6 x 55 gallon drums of sulfuric acid from Gemini Seawater Systems on Dec 6, 2018. Images of receipts are there...

Quoththeraven.substack.com.

That reminds me of something I heard about way back is season 1

Cover up indeed.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

As a PP noted, Trump is mentioned more than 1 million times, per Representative Raskin. It's the Trump Files, not the Epstein Files.

Now, you understand the cover-up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As a PP noted, Trump is mentioned more than 1 million times, per Representative Raskin. It's the Trump Files, not the Epstein Files.

Now, you understand the cover-up.

Keep in mind that this is the stuff they released. They're refusing to release an equal amount of information.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:As a PP noted, Trump is mentioned more than 1 million times, per Representative Raskin. It's the Trump Files, not the Epstein Files.

Now, you understand the cover-up.

It's surprising to me that so few identities have been leaked at this point, why is Raskin not leaking other names?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump called early on:

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/09/trump-jeffrey-epstein-ghislaine-maxwell-palm-beach-police.html

You can see Trump set a trap.

He will spring the good stuff right before the midterms for the maximum land mine.

Yes. This has been discussed today. It doesn't mean that he wasn't involved in the abuse, early, often, and in other settings as well. We know this.

It also doesn't mean he was. What are you basing that on, other than hopium?

Keep your head in the sand, roastie.

I am actually be serious. Accusing someone of pedophilia, trafficking, etc. is a very serious thing and really shouldn't be done without real evidence. Is there actual evidence, even circumstantial, that Trump himself was involved in the Epstein-related crimes?

Plenty enough that he should answer questions under oath.

I am totally fine with that, in terms of him answering questions because there is obviously evidence of Trump being in Epstein's orbit. But are you saying there is "plenty" of evidence that Trump was actually or even potentially involved in illegal activities connected to Epstein?

Think about it this way. You are the POTUS. Your administration holds evidence about a sex trafficking/pedophile ring. People are saying that you are involved, based on past behavior (being held liable for sexual assault, walking among naked teenagers during the Miss Teen USA pageant, ex-wife accusing you of marital rape, you being on the record as grabbing women by their privates and kissing them without consent), and the fact that your name appears in these files thousands of times.

If you wanted to clear your name, what would you do? Would you ask your DOJ to release everything, so people can see what information there is to see? Or would you withhold and redact information (in such a hamfisted way that us normies can figure out that they even redacted the word don't), so you actually look guilty? Trump's knee jerk reaction to everything is to sue people, and if he is being accused without basis, you know that's what he would reach for. So why isn't he?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a PP noted, Trump is mentioned more than 1 million times, per Representative Raskin. It's the Trump Files, not the Epstein Files.

Now, you understand the cover-up.

It's surprising to me that so few identities have been leaked at this point, why is Raskin not leaking other names?

They only had two hours. He is probably laser focused on what he needs to find.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:NEW: Trump is in the unredacted Epstein files "more than a million times," Raskin tells Axios in an interview.

https://www.axios.com/2026/02/10/trump-epstein-files-jamie-raskin-unredacted

I’m sure that is was just coincidence lmao.

DJ “The Diddler” Trump IS the Epstein files.

I can't people are still acting like he's not

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a PP noted, Trump is mentioned more than 1 million times, per Representative Raskin. It's the Trump Files, not the Epstein Files.

Now, you understand the cover-up.

It's surprising to me that so few identities have been leaked at this point, why is Raskin not leaking other names?

They only had two hours. He is probably laser focused on what he needs to find.

Couldn't even find the list of people on the NDA.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NEW: Trump is in the unredacted Epstein files "more than a million times," Raskin tells Axios in an interview.

https://www.axios.com/2026/02/10/trump-epstein-files-jamie-raskin-unredacted

I’m sure that is was just coincidence lmao.

DJ “The Diddler” Trump IS the Epstein files.

I can't people are still acting like he's not

Yep. His greatest business success before 2016 was buying the modeling agency to traffic girls and women, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Best to hold the good stuff till right before the midterms for maximum punishment

Nothing says these men with perverted tastes are not still raping nine year olds. We need to prosecute ASAP. Save the next girl.

This. Every decent human being should be outraged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a PP noted, Trump is mentioned more than 1 million times, per Representative Raskin. It's the Trump Files, not the Epstein Files.

Now, you understand the cover-up.

It's surprising to me that so few identities have been leaked at this point, why is Raskin not leaking other names?

Ro Khanna read 6 names an hour ago. I have a feeling he may run in 2028. Too bad he's a republican.