2026 Girls Player Commitments🥍🥍

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Would you have been happier or content if the Capital Blue roster was more like the number one team yellow jackets manning in the earlier post? No, Then you would've said wow none of these kids can get into Ivy League schools are high academics wow they only have one Harvard

You've got it backwards. Multiple Cap parents would be on here saying 15 of them already got in to Harvard, but they wanted to chase a National Championship instead. They've all deferred acceptance and have been guaranteed their graduate choice of Harvard Med or Harvard Law.

Exactly what this person or like minded posters would say! 110%

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have been an avid poster here and am enjoying the conversation but what I am genuinely confused about is why someone would think someone else is lying. If your kid committed to an Ivy they very well could have had interest from other top schools. I truly don’t think it is that far fetched that people would insinuate someone is lying about it. What incentive is there for them to do that?

This place is exhausting. Not one person has insinuated that a parent is lying about their kid and interest. Yet.

There really isn't a lot of difference between some of these top seven lacrosse clubs. CapBlue beat Long Island Top Gun, the #2 ranked team, and Heroes during the summer in front of over 40 coaches. They see the talent! Those top players on CapBlue can compete with the top players on any of these other teams. It is absurd for someone to imply that top players on the 7th ranked team in the country cannot play at the top 10 lacrosse schools in the country. Not all the players on CapBlue could, but there are 10 to 11 players who can! If you look at other clubs' rosters, it pans out about the same, mixing in some Ivies. This year just happened to be a particularly strong Ivy League year for CapBlue 2026.

You people are insane. Colleges recruit individual athletes, not teams. It is not the coaches' rating system, but it kinda is from some feedback and can serve as a proxy at least. Capital has all of 2 girls that are ranked as the top 70 players as of now in the country, as 5 or 4 stars. The top teams will be targeting a lot of these girls, every year. They will also have their own lists, and certainly from a recruiting class of 7-9 at least some will come from outside those 70 even for the top teams.

But in no way, shape or form will 10 players from any team anywhere with a total of two 5/4 stars be getting firm offers from the very best teams in the country. Not for Capital, not for xyz team that beat so-and-so @ the Elite Awesome Mid Atlantic Festival. No one.

Other (higher) ranked club teams have more (or many more) 5 and 4 stars, and they will have many more players playing for top teams, and even top 10 teams, where talent is already falling off. It's not any kind of coincidence.

I hate to break it to you but those individual player rankings don't mean much....coaches have said so themselves.....which has been shown during the recruitment process.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have been an avid poster here and am enjoying the conversation but what I am genuinely confused about is why someone would think someone else is lying. If your kid committed to an Ivy they very well could have had interest from other top schools. I truly don’t think it is that far fetched that people would insinuate someone is lying about it. What incentive is there for them to do that?

This place is exhausting. Not one person has insinuated that a parent is lying about their kid and interest. Yet.

you misunderstood - my point is the opposite. I believe that these girls could have gone to top ranked lax schools. Maybe not 10 of them but definitely quite a few. I believe that they chose not to. My point is that I am not understanding why that is so unbelievable by some.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have been an avid poster here and am enjoying the conversation but what I am genuinely confused about is why someone would think someone else is lying. If your kid committed to an Ivy they very well could have had interest from other top schools. I truly don’t think it is that far fetched that people would insinuate someone is lying about it. What incentive is there for them to do that?

This place is exhausting. Not one person has insinuated that a parent is lying about their kid and interest. Yet.

There really isn't a lot of difference between some of these top seven lacrosse clubs. CapBlue beat Long Island Top Gun, the #2 ranked team, and Heroes during the summer in front of over 40 coaches. They see the talent! Those top players on CapBlue can compete with the top players on any of these other teams. It is absurd for someone to imply that top players on the 7th ranked team in the country cannot play at the top 10 lacrosse schools in the country. Not all the players on CapBlue could, but there are 10 to 11 players who can! If you look at other clubs' rosters, it pans out about the same, mixing in some Ivies. This year just happened to be a particularly strong Ivy League year for CapBlue 2026.

You people are insane. Colleges recruit individual athletes, not teams. It is not the coaches' rating system, but it kinda is from some feedback and can serve as a proxy at least. Capital has all of 2 girls that are ranked as the top 70 players as of now in the country, as 5 or 4 stars. The top teams will be targeting a lot of these girls, every year. They will also have their own lists, and certainly from a recruiting class of 7-9 at least some will come from outside those 70 even for the top teams.

But in no way, shape or form will 10 players from any team anywhere with a total of two 5/4 stars be getting firm offers from the very best teams in the country. Not for Capital, not for xyz team that beat so-and-so @ the Elite Awesome Mid Atlantic Festival. No one.

Other (higher) ranked club teams have more (or many more) 5 and 4 stars, and they will have many more players playing for top teams, and even top 10 teams, where talent is already falling off. It's not any kind of coincidence.

Why does this topic have you scratching the walls? I mean, I’m enjoying seeing you melt down like this but am genuinely confused why this matters so much to you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have been an avid poster here and am enjoying the conversation but what I am genuinely confused about is why someone would think someone else is lying. If your kid committed to an Ivy they very well could have had interest from other top schools. I truly don’t think it is that far fetched that people would insinuate someone is lying about it. What incentive is there for them to do that?

This place is exhausting. Not one person has insinuated that a parent is lying about their kid and interest. Yet.

There really isn't a lot of difference between some of these top seven lacrosse clubs. CapBlue beat Long Island Top Gun, the #2 ranked team, and Heroes during the summer in front of over 40 coaches. They see the talent! Those top players on CapBlue can compete with the top players on any of these other teams. It is absurd for someone to imply that top players on the 7th ranked team in the country cannot play at the top 10 lacrosse schools in the country. Not all the players on CapBlue could, but there are 10 to 11 players who can! If you look at other clubs' rosters, it pans out about the same, mixing in some Ivies. This year just happened to be a particularly strong Ivy League year for CapBlue 2026.

You people are insane. Colleges recruit individual athletes, not teams. It is not the coaches' rating system, but it kinda is from some feedback and can serve as a proxy at least. Capital has all of 2 girls that are ranked as the top 70 players as of now in the country, as 5 or 4 stars. The top teams will be targeting a lot of these girls, every year. They will also have their own lists, and certainly from a recruiting class of 7-9 at least some will come from outside those 70 even for the top teams.

But in no way, shape or form will 10 players from any team anywhere with a total of two 5/4 stars be getting firm offers from the very best teams in the country. Not for Capital, not for xyz team that beat so-and-so @ the Elite Awesome Mid Atlantic Festival. No one.

Other (higher) ranked club teams have more (or many more) 5 and 4 stars, and they will have many more players playing for top teams, and even top 10 teams, where talent is already falling off. It's not any kind of coincidence.

Why does this topic have you scratching the walls? I mean, I’m enjoying seeing you melt down like this but am genuinely confused why this matters so much to you.

Yes, can we bring back the effervescent “smorgasbord of commitments” poster? It’s the only reason I’ve been returning to this thread.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have been an avid poster here and am enjoying the conversation but what I am genuinely confused about is why someone would think someone else is lying. If your kid committed to an Ivy they very well could have had interest from other top schools. I truly don’t think it is that far fetched that people would insinuate someone is lying about it. What incentive is there for them to do that?

This place is exhausting. Not one person has insinuated that a parent is lying about their kid and interest. Yet.

There really isn't a lot of difference between some of these top seven lacrosse clubs. CapBlue beat Long Island Top Gun, the #2 ranked team, and Heroes during the summer in front of over 40 coaches. They see the talent! Those top players on CapBlue can compete with the top players on any of these other teams. It is absurd for someone to imply that top players on the 7th ranked team in the country cannot play at the top 10 lacrosse schools in the country. Not all the players on CapBlue could, but there are 10 to 11 players who can! If you look at other clubs' rosters, it pans out about the same, mixing in some Ivies. This year just happened to be a particularly strong Ivy League year for CapBlue 2026.

You people are insane. Colleges recruit individual athletes, not teams. It is not the coaches' rating system, but it kinda is from some feedback and can serve as a proxy at least. Capital has all of 2 girls that are ranked as the top 70 players as of now in the country, as 5 or 4 stars. The top teams will be targeting a lot of these girls, every year. They will also have their own lists, and certainly from a recruiting class of 7-9 at least some will come from outside those 70 even for the top teams.

But in no way, shape or form will 10 players from any team anywhere with a total of two 5/4 stars be getting firm offers from the very best teams in the country. Not for Capital, not for xyz team that beat so-and-so @ the Elite Awesome Mid Atlantic Festival. No one.

Other (higher) ranked club teams have more (or many more) 5 and 4 stars, and they will have many more players playing for top teams, and even top 10 teams, where talent is already falling off. It's not any kind of coincidence.

I hate to break it to you but those individual player rankings don't mean much....coaches have said so themselves.....which has been shown during the recruitment process.

No worries, you're not breaking anything to me.
BC has 10 recruits.
4 - 5 star, 3 - 4 star
3 - N/A

UNC has 9
5 - 5 star, 3 - 4 star
1 - N/A

NW has 6, I think a 5 and 2 4s. And 2 from midwest and west, typical for them and often not rated. When they come to DC, they grab the All Met POTY, or a 5 star in Baltimore, not half the Capital team.

They and UNC and BC have classes that are proxied by ratings. They're doing a bad job of not matching up. So no, all the unrated Cap players, from what is a pool of at least 1-200 or many more unrated players, aren't begging off offers en masse.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have been an avid poster here and am enjoying the conversation but what I am genuinely confused about is why someone would think someone else is lying. If your kid committed to an Ivy they very well could have had interest from other top schools. I truly don’t think it is that far fetched that people would insinuate someone is lying about it. What incentive is there for them to do that?

This place is exhausting. Not one person has insinuated that a parent is lying about their kid and interest. Yet.

There really isn't a lot of difference between some of these top seven lacrosse clubs. CapBlue beat Long Island Top Gun, the #2 ranked team, and Heroes during the summer in front of over 40 coaches. They see the talent! Those top players on CapBlue can compete with the top players on any of these other teams. It is absurd for someone to imply that top players on the 7th ranked team in the country cannot play at the top 10 lacrosse schools in the country. Not all the players on CapBlue could, but there are 10 to 11 players who can! If you look at other clubs' rosters, it pans out about the same, mixing in some Ivies. This year just happened to be a particularly strong Ivy League year for CapBlue 2026.

You people are insane. Colleges recruit individual athletes, not teams. It is not the coaches' rating system, but it kinda is from some feedback and can serve as a proxy at least. Capital has all of 2 girls that are ranked as the top 70 players as of now in the country, as 5 or 4 stars. The top teams will be targeting a lot of these girls, every year. They will also have their own lists, and certainly from a recruiting class of 7-9 at least some will come from outside those 70 even for the top teams.

But in no way, shape or form will 10 players from any team anywhere with a total of two 5/4 stars be getting firm offers from the very best teams in the country. Not for Capital, not for xyz team that beat so-and-so @ the Elite Awesome Mid Atlantic Festival. No one.

Other (higher) ranked club teams have more (or many more) 5 and 4 stars, and they will have many more players playing for top teams, and even top 10 teams, where talent is already falling off. It's not any kind of coincidence.

Why does this topic have you scratching the walls? I mean, I’m enjoying seeing you melt down like this but am genuinely confused why this matters so much to you.

Really just trying to help folks set expectations. I think it's sinking in for them, but I guess it's a long slog for them. Watching the game. Walls untouched, though that's a new one on me, will look it up someday.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have been an avid poster here and am enjoying the conversation but what I am genuinely confused about is why someone would think someone else is lying. If your kid committed to an Ivy they very well could have had interest from other top schools. I truly don’t think it is that far fetched that people would insinuate someone is lying about it. What incentive is there for them to do that?

This place is exhausting. Not one person has insinuated that a parent is lying about their kid and interest. Yet.

There really isn't a lot of difference between some of these top seven lacrosse clubs. CapBlue beat Long Island Top Gun, the #2 ranked team, and Heroes during the summer in front of over 40 coaches. They see the talent! Those top players on CapBlue can compete with the top players on any of these other teams. It is absurd for someone to imply that top players on the 7th ranked team in the country cannot play at the top 10 lacrosse schools in the country. Not all the players on CapBlue could, but there are 10 to 11 players who can! If you look at other clubs' rosters, it pans out about the same, mixing in some Ivies. This year just happened to be a particularly strong Ivy League year for CapBlue 2026.

You people are insane. Colleges recruit individual athletes, not teams. It is not the coaches' rating system, but it kinda is from some feedback and can serve as a proxy at least. Capital has all of 2 girls that are ranked as the top 70 players as of now in the country, as 5 or 4 stars. The top teams will be targeting a lot of these girls, every year. They will also have their own lists, and certainly from a recruiting class of 7-9 at least some will come from outside those 70 even for the top teams.

But in no way, shape or form will 10 players from any team anywhere with a total of two 5/4 stars be getting firm offers from the very best teams in the country. Not for Capital, not for xyz team that beat so-and-so @ the Elite Awesome Mid Atlantic Festival. No one.

Other (higher) ranked club teams have more (or many more) 5 and 4 stars, and they will have many more players playing for top teams, and even top 10 teams, where talent is already falling off. It's not any kind of coincidence.

I hate to break it to you but those individual player rankings don't mean much....coaches have said so themselves.....which has been shown during the recruitment process.

No worries, you're not breaking anything to me.
BC has 10 recruits.
4 - 5 star, 3 - 4 star
3 - N/A

UNC has 9
5 - 5 star, 3 - 4 star
1 - N/A

NW has 6, I think a 5 and 2 4s. And 2 from midwest and west, typical for them and often not rated. When they come to DC, they grab the All Met POTY, or a 5 star in Baltimore, not half the Capital team.

They and UNC and BC have classes that are proxied by ratings. They're doing a bad job of not matching up. So no, all the unrated Cap players, from what is a pool of at least 1-200 or many more unrated players, aren't begging off offers en masse.

Again I don't know where half of the team came from but I am confident a few (never saw half) could have had the opportunity and chose against. One parent stated it here. I am not sure why anyone would lie about that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have been an avid poster here and am enjoying the conversation but what I am genuinely confused about is why someone would think someone else is lying. If your kid committed to an Ivy they very well could have had interest from other top schools. I truly don’t think it is that far fetched that people would insinuate someone is lying about it. What incentive is there for them to do that?

This place is exhausting. Not one person has insinuated that a parent is lying about their kid and interest. Yet.

There really isn't a lot of difference between some of these top seven lacrosse clubs. CapBlue beat Long Island Top Gun, the #2 ranked team, and Heroes during the summer in front of over 40 coaches. They see the talent! Those top players on CapBlue can compete with the top players on any of these other teams. It is absurd for someone to imply that top players on the 7th ranked team in the country cannot play at the top 10 lacrosse schools in the country. Not all the players on CapBlue could, but there are 10 to 11 players who can! If you look at other clubs' rosters, it pans out about the same, mixing in some Ivies. This year just happened to be a particularly strong Ivy League year for CapBlue 2026.

You people are insane. Colleges recruit individual athletes, not teams. It is not the coaches' rating system, but it kinda is from some feedback and can serve as a proxy at least. Capital has all of 2 girls that are ranked as the top 70 players as of now in the country, as 5 or 4 stars. The top teams will be targeting a lot of these girls, every year. They will also have their own lists, and certainly from a recruiting class of 7-9 at least some will come from outside those 70 even for the top teams.

But in no way, shape or form will 10 players from any team anywhere with a total of two 5/4 stars be getting firm offers from the very best teams in the country. Not for Capital, not for xyz team that beat so-and-so @ the Elite Awesome Mid Atlantic Festival. No one.

Other (higher) ranked club teams have more (or many more) 5 and 4 stars, and they will have many more players playing for top teams, and even top 10 teams, where talent is already falling off. It's not any kind of coincidence.

I hate to break it to you but those individual player rankings don't mean much....coaches have said so themselves.....which has been shown during the recruitment process.

No worries, you're not breaking anything to me.
BC has 10 recruits.
4 - 5 star, 3 - 4 star
3 - N/A

UNC has 9
5 - 5 star, 3 - 4 star
1 - N/A

NW has 6, I think a 5 and 2 4s. And 2 from midwest and west, typical for them and often not rated. When they come to DC, they grab the All Met POTY, or a 5 star in Baltimore, not half the Capital team.

They and UNC and BC have classes that are proxied by ratings. They're doing a bad job of not matching up. So no, all the unrated Cap players, from what is a pool of at least 1-200 or many more unrated players, aren't begging off offers en masse.

Again I don't know where half of the team came from but I am confident a few (never saw half) could have had the opportunity and chose against. One parent stated it here. I am not sure why anyone would lie about that.

No one has said there would or could not be a few with an opportunity or 2. And again, no one has accused the PP about lying about their kid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Here are the commitments so far for the number one and number two ranked teams in the class of 2026.

Yellow Jacket Manning #1 Ranked 2026
1 Rutgers
1 UVA
1 Quinnipiac
1 Vanderbilt
1 Vanderbilt
1 Florida State
1 Florida State
1 Florida State
1 Florida State
1 Georgtown
1 Maryland
1 UNC
1 JHU
1 BC
1 BC
1 Florida
1 Harvard


LI Top Guns Black 2026 #2 Rank
1 Navy
1 Michigan
1 Fairfield
1 Arizona State
1 Drexel
1 UVA
1 Dartmouth
1 Stanford
1 UMass
1 Princeton
1 Duke
1 Yale
1 Northwestern
1 Northwestern
1 BC
1 High Point

You missed a Navy commit on Top Guns. She was one of the first commits of the 26 class and the first from Top Guns.

Definitely do not want to miss any service Academy recruits. Those are really special commits and extraordinary option for some of these players. It's a shame capital blue doesn't have any.

Seriously?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have been an avid poster here and am enjoying the conversation but what I am genuinely confused about is why someone would think someone else is lying. If your kid committed to an Ivy they very well could have had interest from other top schools. I truly don’t think it is that far fetched that people would insinuate someone is lying about it. What incentive is there for them to do that?

This place is exhausting. Not one person has insinuated that a parent is lying about their kid and interest. Yet.

There really isn't a lot of difference between some of these top seven lacrosse clubs. CapBlue beat Long Island Top Gun, the #2 ranked team, and Heroes during the summer in front of over 40 coaches. They see the talent! Those top players on CapBlue can compete with the top players on any of these other teams. It is absurd for someone to imply that top players on the 7th ranked team in the country cannot play at the top 10 lacrosse schools in the country. Not all the players on CapBlue could, but there are 10 to 11 players who can! If you look at other clubs' rosters, it pans out about the same, mixing in some Ivies. This year just happened to be a particularly strong Ivy League year for CapBlue 2026.

You people are insane. Colleges recruit individual athletes, not teams. It is not the coaches' rating system, but it kinda is from some feedback and can serve as a proxy at least. Capital has all of 2 girls that are ranked as the top 70 players as of now in the country, as 5 or 4 stars. The top teams will be targeting a lot of these girls, every year. They will also have their own lists, and certainly from a recruiting class of 7-9 at least some will come from outside those 70 even for the top teams.

But in no way, shape or form will 10 players from any team anywhere with a total of two 5/4 stars be getting firm offers from the very best teams in the country. Not for Capital, not for xyz team that beat so-and-so @ the Elite Awesome Mid Atlantic Festival. No one.

Other (higher) ranked club teams have more (or many more) 5 and 4 stars, and they will have many more players playing for top teams, and even top 10 teams, where talent is already falling off. It's not any kind of coincidence.

I hate to break it to you but those individual player rankings don't mean much....coaches have said so themselves.....which has been shown during the recruitment process.

No worries, you're not breaking anything to me.
BC has 10 recruits.
4 - 5 star, 3 - 4 star
3 - N/A

UNC has 9
5 - 5 star, 3 - 4 star
1 - N/A

NW has 6, I think a 5 and 2 4s. And 2 from midwest and west, typical for them and often not rated. When they come to DC, they grab the All Met POTY, or a 5 star in Baltimore, not half the Capital team.

They and UNC and BC have classes that are proxied by ratings. They're doing a bad job of not matching up. So no, all the unrated Cap players, from what is a pool of at least 1-200 or many more unrated players, aren't begging off offers en masse.

One thing you're also completely missing is that a lot of these ratings are done by appearing at certain events hosted by Inside Lacrosse and certain INDIVIDUAL showcases or invite only events (Politics) where evaluation may happen. These can be expensive individual recruiting showcases, not team events. CapBlue has a very strict attendance policy, which conflicts with and limits players' ability to attend most of these costly, unnecessary events that could probably get more of them rated. A player doesn't need a five or four star rating or any of those individual showcases or rankings to get recruited; that is the whole point. A player can also pay to be evaluated by inside lacrosse.
It seems CapBlue wants the players to focus on the team and team building, not going to individual showcases to try to get four and five stars. Cap Blue players have never needed these star rating to get recruited. And for the most part, many cap blue players match up against these 4/5 star players on the field and at tournaments while coaches are watching.
Google about the star ratings and you'll get all kinds of information about the inconsistencies and the politics with it. It's even worse on the boys side- a player will not have a star rating and then they get committed and suddenly they're a five star!

[Anonymous]

Please just stop, they're not all getting offered and bid on between NW, BC and UNC. This has become dumber by the hour.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have been an avid poster here and am enjoying the conversation but what I am genuinely confused about is why someone would think someone else is lying. If your kid committed to an Ivy they very well could have had interest from other top schools. I truly don’t think it is that far fetched that people would insinuate someone is lying about it. What incentive is there for them to do that?

This place is exhausting. Not one person has insinuated that a parent is lying about their kid and interest. Yet.

There really isn't a lot of difference between some of these top seven lacrosse clubs. CapBlue beat Long Island Top Gun, the #2 ranked team, and Heroes during the summer in front of over 40 coaches. They see the talent! Those top players on CapBlue can compete with the top players on any of these other teams. It is absurd for someone to imply that top players on the 7th ranked team in the country cannot play at the top 10 lacrosse schools in the country. Not all the players on CapBlue could, but there are 10 to 11 players who can! If you look at other clubs' rosters, it pans out about the same, mixing in some Ivies. This year just happened to be a particularly strong Ivy League year for CapBlue 2026.

You people are insane. Colleges recruit individual athletes, not teams. It is not the coaches' rating system, but it kinda is from some feedback and can serve as a proxy at least. Capital has all of 2 girls that are ranked as the top 70 players as of now in the country, as 5 or 4 stars. The top teams will be targeting a lot of these girls, every year. They will also have their own lists, and certainly from a recruiting class of 7-9 at least some will come from outside those 70 even for the top teams.

But in no way, shape or form will 10 players from any team anywhere with a total of two 5/4 stars be getting firm offers from the very best teams in the country. Not for Capital, not for xyz team that beat so-and-so @ the Elite Awesome Mid Atlantic Festival. No one.

Other (higher) ranked club teams have more (or many more) 5 and 4 stars, and they will have many more players playing for top teams, and even top 10 teams, where talent is already falling off. It's not any kind of coincidence.

Why does this topic have you scratching the walls? I mean, I’m enjoying seeing you melt down like this but am genuinely confused why this matters so much to you.

Really just trying to help folks set expectations. I think it's sinking in for them, but I guess it's a long slog for them. Watching the game. Walls untouched, though that's a new one on me, will look it up someday.

Coach - it’s time you give up this ghost.

[Anonymous]

“These can be expensive individual recruiting showcases, not team events.”

Are you now saying that Cap parents can’t afford these showcases but other programs families can? Hilarious how this keeps shifting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote: Please just stop, they're not all getting offered and bid on between NW, BC and UNC. This has become dumber by the hour.

Not understanding where anyone said that!!! You are the only one saying it!