OK, so both of you did some prep, albeit not to the extent of tutoring. But, how much math enrichment did you do in elementary school? I think you want to extricate test prep, but it is all the prep together that preps you for the test sometimes. So, did you spend time in AOPS, Kumon, A++, Dr. Li? Hopkins CTY? That is extensive prep in addition to your prep book. My kid also did the prep book on her own and is a high scorer. She has not done much in the way of EC enrichment, but she has had a lot of parent support with school and is in a magnet. That is also enrichment, so we are not immune. My point is that the parents who think their kids are naturally smarter because they scored well on a test are are falsely inflating their kids' standing relative to others. . It's OK if universities are looking for talented kids with diverse offerings and potential who may not have achieved at the same level on a test, especially if they did not get any enrichment or have a learning difference. The pissing contest needs to stop. Also, the idea that there is one recipe for what "merits" admission. There are many means of merit, not just the test your kid excels at. |
You have a very weird way of thinking. This happens all the time to everyone. There are kids who practice and train hard to get into varsity football, basketball, soccer, etc. teams. A lot of them don't make it. Kids prepare and go to math or science competitions, but a lot of them don't get any award. The kid got into Georgia Tech which is like T20 for Engineering thanks to the stats at least. |
But everyone isn’t suing because they didn’t get what they wanted. Mr 1590 is suing over it. Everyone else just rolls with the punches knowing you win some and lose some. |
And that's a boy who probably gets his needs met. Doesn't have to support family, always has food available, etc. |
x10000 It seems some groups have a difficult time accepting this one truth. |
It's two totally separate topics. He's just joining the the case already in progress as a member of the organization, and it's easy to do. There's strong suspicions about racial discriminations against Asians students, and the US Supreme Court is looking at it. |
"There are many means of merit, not just the extracurriculars, essays, and athletics your kid excels at" |
THERE IS NO 'SECRET SAUCE' - as some people claim there is. Seems certain groups want an answer, so they can prep for it, but not one answer exists - except (listen carefully) -
Admission in up to the individual school. Period. |
Yes I'm sure all the schools got it wrong for this guy. Or maybe he wasn't that special after all. Sounds like he's an entitled brat. |
+1000 |
So true: vibes, political reliability, and race of course. All those are “merit” now. |
And they likely are. Perhaps they individually do not have the "secret sauce" Harvard is looking for. Sure if Harvard had an 80% acceptance rate, then they could show they should be admitted, but with a 3.4% admission rate, fact is majority are rejected, including many many many many many highly qualified students. Just because you think you "have it all" does not mean Harvard feels that way. And it's not racist if you don't get admitted. And yes, the "likeabilty" will just work it's way into the essays/teacher rec or some other criteria |
+1 Or the inner city kid who overcomes many obstacles to get a 1500 and a nearly perfect GPA while being surrounded largely by kids who may not even graduate HS. They are also working really hard, but have more to work at in life when they are not so privileged in any aspect |
But not at the level for many privileged and asians. They spend 40 hour+ with 1-1 $150/hr tutoring to get that 1580. Very different than a self motivated kid who buys the books, studies for 10-15 hours and takes the test/gets a 1580. |
He's probably used to getting everything he wants. And finally didn't and just can't handle it. So much for resiliency. |