Is it easier to detect fraud on paper or at the booth? Seems like data can be manipulated either way, but which verification has more integrity? To me, it seems Mail-in, but I am not opposed to in-person. Honestly everyone should have both options, with security measures for both options. Even if you put a mail in ballot in a secure collection box that is manned by video and picked up by a representative in each party, and tallied/verified by all.
There has always been a minor risk of fraud, but paper trails don’t go away. This is why older people still keep cancelled paper checks. ![]() |
It seems most of the verified cases of fraud involve the party that says there is a lot of fraud. I guess they would know. |
Ok. So the murderer in Minnesota? Apparently he was committing voter fraud in Florida. And of course he is a republican. Honestly, you can’t make this up. https://twitter.com/VoteDanHelm/status/1268968065896759297?s=20 Maybe this is fake news. Who the heck knows anymore. |
Not fake news. |
If the ballots were rejected, that seems to indicate the fail-safe was working, no? |
In this case. Question is..... how many times has this happened when it wasn't caught? |
Not mail in ballots....... absentee ballots. By a Democratic county clerk.
Glad she was caught.
https://www.mlive.com/news/ann-arbor/2020/06/michigan-clerk-to-stand-trial-on-altering-absentee-ballot-records.html |
Would there be less concern about voter fraud if we didn’t use the electoral college system? You get one vote. You use it. Regardless of if you live in DC but work in Florida or use an address in Maine. All US citizens over the age of 18 get one vote.
This is a serious question that I have not looked into but I know someone would know the answer. |
No. It would make no difference. Fraud is fraud. |
Where have you been? This is the story that started this thread. Meanwhile, we have several other instances of voter fraud and clear opportunities for fraud. |