Agree 1,000%. The bitterness towards the entire school and community is just so extreme. These posters should be addressed for defamation - of the entire school, the PTA and the community. It's pathetic and ridiculous and has to stop. Thanks for your post PP |
The winners are usually not in a sour mood. |
| maybe those in a sour mood are being bullied. Admin at one of these schools is awful. |
Pray tell...which are the false claims? Isn't the PTA elected by the parents to represent the parents? |
But nonetheless enjoyed the benefits of that decision by the PTA |
| GET.OVER.IT..... |
Is McKinley over the overcrowding yet? |
New poster. Yes, the PTA is elected by the parents. But several years have passed since these incidents occurred. So the PTA is likely different, there are new parents at the school, etc. How long does the bad reputation last — I’m genuinely curious. Im not suggesting people get over it, but APS is about to redraw the boundary lines again. Will that make it right? |
Two years have passed, not several, and as a result a few thousand children will have spent some or all of their elementary school in a vastly overcrowded facility with almost no field space while nearby schools have capacity. The boundary changes will hopefully make it right, but not until 2021. It may be over to the families at Nottingham, but those decisions still very much impact the families at McKinley. |
| Didn't McKinley just go through a multi-million dollar expansion to increase student capacity and help to relieve overcrowding? Last I checked, it was slightly over 100% capacity. |
McKinley was built to provide classroom seats for 685 students and as of last week had 795 students in the building + 16 preschool students using a classroom at Reed. Additionally, McKinley's cafeteria can only hold a max of 762 kids with 3 seatings-- which is why McKinley is only one of three elementary schools in the county that had to go to 4 lunch seating shifts. The "percentage over capacity" statistic is meaningless and even the School Board is not referring to it anymore. Some schools have more land and bigger cafeterias and are able to shoulder the burden of trailers better than others-- and McKinley is *not* one of them. You can figure that out yourself by reading this APS facility optimization report. https://www.apsva.us/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Facilities-Optimization-Study.pdf |
| AND......The McKinley addition would have been enough if the SB had kept the original boundary changes that had all neighboring schools hovering right around full usage. |
Also, there's nothing inaccurate about this. Nottingham parents DID screw McK. Not ALL Nottingham parents, but enough. I don't remember a huge contingent of Nottingham parents showing up to board meetings saying please, let us absorb those planning units! Signed, a former Nottingham now McK parent who is honestly probably happier that my kid is at McK |
Everyone is always saying how happy they are at McK, it seems like a great school. So why is there so much bitterness? What's the point, if you and your kids are happy? Nottingham was at 147% of capacity prior to Discovery opening. So guess what, Nottingham suffered for several years prior to Discovery opening. My children had "brunch" for lunch - at 10am because of the limited seating and capacity issues. So just because there isn't a bunch of bitter Nottingham parents on here complaining about how overcrowded Nottingham was prior to Discovery, it doesn't mean it didn't happen. |
Agreed. We were at Nottingham during those overcrowding years, and no one at the other schools, especially not McKinley, gave a shit about what our kids were going through. Yet they all expected us to then go to bat for them, even when it meant our school still potentially being overcrowded. I feel for the families who went from Tuckahoe to McKinley because they never got relief, but the rest? Selfish hypocrites who have reaped what they sowed. |