Do you have data to back this up? Considering that so many Wall Street employees come from elite colleges, almost all of which pledge to meet students' full financial need, it doesn't really follow that large numbers of them are struggling financially in the way you describe. The people who are from truly poor families aren't likely to have much, if any, loan burden (though they might opt to send money home to their parents). The ones who do have giant loans got them because they actually *are* from reasonably well-to-do families that didn't qualify for much financial aid. |
Education then nonprofit. Don't regret my IB experience at all - just wish I would have done it after undergrad. |
+1. I met all kinds of people. |
I am hardly out of touch. You work 60 - 80 hours a week for the money and see if it's worth it. I worked at big law and even that was more fulfilling. |
Your view coming from some imagined belief for how the world works...that only the rich get richer. Mine comes from having run a sales and trading desk at Goldman, with a personal background as first generation to college. I wonder who has more credibility on the subject? |
Don't be silly. Financial aid is only for undergrad. Do you believe that only people with rich parents deserve to go to grad school? I met many people who were socking away money like no other because they knew they needed to continue schooling, mom and dad (if one even existed) lived in a shitty rental with a HHI of $30K, and often they were the oldest child with many siblings in the pipeline whose lives they could greatly improve if they just took one for the team and grounded away for 70-80 hours a week. |
It is obvious you have never been poor and have never had the responsibility of lifting up an entire family or even community. You can stop talking now. |
| Postal worker's son from the Bronx, who grew up in public housing. Farmer's son from Barrington, Illinois . Farmer's son from Willey, Illinois. The last three chairmen of Goldman Sachs. Not exactly to the manor born. |
Wall Street is the ultimate meritocracy. As long as you can work hard and make money, it doesn't matter what your family background is. |
Not necessarily. Anecdotally, that was not my experience. My experience is that people who are hungry for money tend to be those who did not grow up with much. |
This is not true in my experience. My husband started on Wall Street (equity analyst at one of the big banks which is actually no longer on WS itself), worked there for a few years, went for MBA, went back, then left for greener pastures because we didn't want to raise kids in the city. Now makes seven figures working 55 hours a week. Portfolio manager. Small city, no commute. People don't work those grueling hours all their careers. Junior people are called grunts for a reason. |
No. It's the difference between people who like sciences (biology or chemistry) vs. people who like math. Fwiw, money (and probably the hours too) is much better in finance. |
The only people who were willing to work 70-80 hours for the long term grew up poor. Because only people who didn't have money thought it was worth it to burn their youth like that. |
Yep, that's exactly what Wall Street wants the brilliant and hard-working first gen Princeton student to think: There is NO WAY to gain financial stability for you and your family other than coming to work for us! It's the natural progression, fait accompli, manifest destiny! I totally agree that first gen students don't have the same luxury to decide to take a $25k/year publishing job in NYC after graduation. I wouldn't fault a first gen student for choosing to go to Wall Street either. However, there are many other options to make a very good living and support your family than going to Wall Street. |
No, I have a relative doing this at great expense to himself and his family. We grew up solidly middle class. He's addicted to the prestige and doesn't know what else to do with himself. It's very sad. |