Attack at Bangladesh cafe popular with foreigners

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not sure Trump will take the war to the enemy PP. He seems to be an isolationist. I would anticipate full withdrawal and heightened security at home and for US interests abroad. Very pinpoint aggression if/when terrorists ventured forth. Very little aid as these places imploded - probably no fly refugee zones. Is this better than fighting these wars so aimlessly and at times cynically as current leadership has done?

Please discuss if you think my read of him as an isolationist is wrong. I am having a hard time getting a bead on his foreign policy and approach to the war on terror.

He is a lot better than Clinton for sure. He knows who the enemy is, and is not beholden to those that protect them

Well today he thinks the enemy is Jewish people:

http://www.timesofisrael.com/trump-deletes-anti-clinton-corruption-ad-with-star-of-david/

He's saying SHE is an enemy to the Jewish people.

WHAT?? No, you can't spin this away. He put a picture of Clinton on top of a background of money with "Most Corrupt Politician" inside the figure of a Star of David. Not only that but the original meme came from a Nazi website.

Meaning she's on the take. It's not a slam on Jews. I'm a Jew - trust me, I know a slam. I see them on DCUM all the time.

Ok. So putting the Star of David on the photo clues us in that Clinton is "on the take." But that's not anti-Semitic at all. Okay....

The Star is about Israel. You must be anti-Semitic since you think it is about Jews and money.

When an antisemite puts a star of david on top of a pile of money in an ad about corruption, it is not just about Israel.

I think you've mistaken Trump for Obama, and most of DCUM.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not sure Trump will take the war to the enemy PP. He seems to be an isolationist. I would anticipate full withdrawal and heightened security at home and for US interests abroad. Very pinpoint aggression if/when terrorists ventured forth. Very little aid as these places imploded - probably no fly refugee zones. Is this better than fighting these wars so aimlessly and at times cynically as current leadership has done?

Please discuss if you think my read of him as an isolationist is wrong. I am having a hard time getting a bead on his foreign policy and approach to the war on terror.

He is a lot better than Clinton for sure. He knows who the enemy is, and is not beholden to those that protect them

Well today he thinks the enemy is Jewish people:

http://www.timesofisrael.com/trump-deletes-anti-clinton-corruption-ad-with-star-of-david/

He's saying SHE is an enemy to the Jewish people.

WHAT?? No, you can't spin this away. He put a picture of Clinton on top of a background of money with "Most Corrupt Politician" inside the figure of a Star of David. Not only that but the original meme came from a Nazi website.

Meaning she's on the take. It's not a slam on Jews. I'm a Jew - trust me, I know a slam. I see them on DCUM all the time.

Ok. So putting the Star of David on the photo clues us in that Clinton is "on the take." But that's not anti-Semitic at all. Okay....

The Star is about Israel. You must be anti-Semitic since you think it is about Jews and money.

When an antisemite puts a star of david on top of a pile of money in an ad about corruption, it is not just about Israel.

Trump is hardly the anti-Semitic.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB862335923489989500

In fact, most liberals hate the state of Israel and more or less support the Palestianian terrorists. They make it well known. In fact, Obama has worsened relations with our Jewish ally in the Middle East and the only country that there that shares our values of democracy and capitalism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Most of the people killed by these extremists are other muslims. You cherry pick the events that involve non-muslims to prove your point.


200 people were killed by ISIS in Baghdad this weekend. Is there a thread on it? No. Is anyone talking about their religious background? No. What is the total of Muslim vs. non-muslims killed by ISIS this week?

This argument is invalid. I see leftists parade this argument out like it shows there isn't an issue with Islam. Most blacks in this country are killed by other blacks. Does that dismiss there is an issue within the culture that needs to be addressed? No it doesn't.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not sure Trump will take the war to the enemy PP. He seems to be an isolationist. I would anticipate full withdrawal and heightened security at home and for US interests abroad. Very pinpoint aggression if/when terrorists ventured forth. Very little aid as these places imploded - probably no fly refugee zones. Is this better than fighting these wars so aimlessly and at times cynically as current leadership has done?

Please discuss if you think my read of him as an isolationist is wrong. I am having a hard time getting a bead on his foreign policy and approach to the war on terror.

He is a lot better than Clinton for sure. He knows who the enemy is, and is not beholden to those that protect them

Well today he thinks the enemy is Jewish people:

http://www.timesofisrael.com/trump-deletes-anti-clinton-corruption-ad-with-star-of-david/

He's saying SHE is an enemy to the Jewish people.

WHAT?? No, you can't spin this away. He put a picture of Clinton on top of a background of money with "Most Corrupt Politician" inside the figure of a Star of David. Not only that but the original meme came from a Nazi website.

Meaning she's on the take. It's not a slam on Jews. I'm a Jew - trust me, I know a slam. I see them on DCUM all the time.

Ok. So putting the Star of David on the photo clues us in that Clinton is "on the take." But that's not anti-Semitic at all. Okay....

The Star is about Israel. You must be anti-Semitic since you think it is about Jews and money.

When an antisemite puts a star of david on top of a pile of money in an ad about corruption, it is not just about Israel.

Trump is hardly the anti-Semitic.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB862335923489989500

In fact, most liberals hate the state of Israel and more or less support the Palestianian terrorists. They make it well known. In fact, Obama has worsened relations with our Jewish ally in the Middle East and the only country that there that shares our values of democracy and capitalism.

That may be true, but he has a habit of retweeting things from racist supporters. And disliking the policies of Israel is not anti-Semitism. This is a position held by many American and Israeli Jews.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most of the people killed by these extremists are other muslims. You cherry pick the events that involve non-muslims to prove your point.


200 people were killed by ISIS in Baghdad this weekend. Is there a thread on it? No. Is anyone talking about their religious background? No. What is the total of Muslim vs. non-muslims killed by ISIS this week?

This argument is invalid. I see leftists parade this argument out like it shows there isn't an issue with Islam. Most blacks in this country are killed by other blacks. Does that dismiss there is an issue within the culture that needs to be addressed? No it doesn't.

1. Stop calling people "leftists." WTF is that. Is your goal for people to read your post, think "oh, THAT guy" and move along without thinking about what you are saying? Then you are succeeding.

2. Your analogy proves the opposite of what you are saying- there is not something inherently wrong with black people. If you are trying to argue that there is, good luck with that.

3. I sort of agree with your larger point. There IS something going on within Islam. I understand people not wanting to say so, because we are inherently idealistic and unwilling to generalize to that extent, but it seems to me, at least, that Islam needs some sort of reform. This is not sustainable, for a certain percentage of Muslims, no matter how small, to accept this kind of ideology.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most of the people killed by these extremists are other muslims. You cherry pick the events that involve non-muslims to prove your point.


200 people were killed by ISIS in Baghdad this weekend. Is there a thread on it? No. Is anyone talking about their religious background? No. What is the total of Muslim vs. non-muslims killed by ISIS this week?

This argument is invalid. I see leftists parade this argument out like it shows there isn't an issue with Islam. Most blacks in this country are killed by other blacks. Does that dismiss there is an issue within the culture that needs to be addressed? No it doesn't.

According to your logic, we are seeing Christian on Christian violence.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am not sure Trump will take the war to the enemy PP. He seems to be an isolationist. I would anticipate full withdrawal and heightened security at home and for US interests abroad. Very pinpoint aggression if/when terrorists ventured forth. Very little aid as these places imploded - probably no fly refugee zones. Is this better than fighting these wars so aimlessly and at times cynically as current leadership has done?

Please discuss if you think my read of him as an isolationist is wrong. I am having a hard time getting a bead on his foreign policy and approach to the war on terror.

He is a lot better than Clinton for sure. He knows who the enemy is, and is not beholden to those that protect them

Well today he thinks the enemy is Jewish people:

http://www.timesofisrael.com/trump-deletes-anti-clinton-corruption-ad-with-star-of-david/

He's saying SHE is an enemy to the Jewish people.

WHAT?? No, you can't spin this away. He put a picture of Clinton on top of a background of money with "Most Corrupt Politician" inside the figure of a Star of David. Not only that but the original meme came from a Nazi website.

Meaning she's on the take. It's not a slam on Jews. I'm a Jew - trust me, I know a slam. I see them on DCUM all the time.

Ok. So putting the Star of David on the photo clues us in that Clinton is "on the take." But that's not anti-Semitic at all. Okay....

The Star is about Israel. You must be anti-Semitic since you think it is about Jews and money.

When an antisemite puts a star of david on top of a pile of money in an ad about corruption, it is not just about Israel.

Trump is hardly the anti-Semitic.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB862335923489989500

In fact, most liberals hate the state of Israel and more or less support the Palestianian terrorists. They make it well known. In fact, Obama has worsened relations with our Jewish ally in the Middle East and the only country that there that shares our values of democracy and capitalism.

That may be true, but he has a habit of retweeting things from racist supporters. And disliking the policies of Israel is not anti-Semitism. This is a position held by many American and Israeli Jews.

Do yourself a favor. Get the free app Red Alert.. Each ping alert signifies a rocket launched at Israel. You will turn off the volume within hours because the noise will drive you crazy.

My in=laws use that argument: Israelis are brutal people - but we don't mean Jews - all the time. It's horse-shit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most of the people killed by these extremists are other muslims. You cherry pick the events that involve non-muslims to prove your point.


200 people were killed by ISIS in Baghdad this weekend. Is there a thread on it? No. Is anyone talking about their religious background? No. What is the total of Muslim vs. non-muslims killed by ISIS this week?

This argument is invalid. I see leftists parade this argument out like it shows there isn't an issue with Islam. Most blacks in this country are killed by other blacks. Does that dismiss there is an issue within the culture that needs to be addressed? No it doesn't.

According to your logic, we are seeing Christian on Christian violence.

That would be the case if they're doing it in the name of Jesus, but they're not. Try again

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most of the people killed by these extremists are other muslims. You cherry pick the events that involve non-muslims to prove your point.


200 people were killed by ISIS in Baghdad this weekend. Is there a thread on it? No. Is anyone talking about their religious background? No. What is the total of Muslim vs. non-muslims killed by ISIS this week?

This argument is invalid. I see leftists parade this argument out like it shows there isn't an issue with Islam. Most blacks in this country are killed by other blacks. Does that dismiss there is an issue within the culture that needs to be addressed? No it doesn't.

1. Stop calling people "leftists." WTF is that. Is your goal for people to read your post, think "oh, THAT guy" and move along without thinking about what you are saying? Then you are succeeding.

2. Your analogy proves the opposite of what you are saying- there is not something inherently wrong with black people. If you are trying to argue that there is, good luck with that.

3. I sort of agree with your larger point. There IS something going on within Islam. I understand people not wanting to say so, because we are inherently idealistic and unwilling to generalize to that extent, but it seems to me, at least, that Islam needs some sort of reform. This is not sustainable, for a certain percentage of Muslims, no matter how small, to accept this kind of ideology.

The bolded? THAT is what the terrorists want you to believe and do. All the other horse-shit about love and acceptance and 'just ignore them so more don't join' is more liberal Maypole dancing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most of the people killed by these extremists are other muslims. You cherry pick the events that involve non-muslims to prove your point.


200 people were killed by ISIS in Baghdad this weekend. Is there a thread on it? No. Is anyone talking about their religious background? No. What is the total of Muslim vs. non-muslims killed by ISIS this week?

This argument is invalid. I see leftists parade this argument out like it shows there isn't an issue with Islam. Most blacks in this country are killed by other blacks. Does that dismiss there is an issue within the culture that needs to be addressed? No it doesn't.

1. Stop calling people "leftists." WTF is that. Is your goal for people to read your post, think "oh, THAT guy" and move along without thinking about what you are saying? Then you are succeeding.

2. Your analogy proves the opposite of what you are saying- there is not something inherently wrong with black people. If you are trying to argue that there is, good luck with that.

3. I sort of agree with your larger point. There IS something going on within Islam. I understand people not wanting to say so, because we are inherently idealistic and unwilling to generalize to that extent, but it seems to me, at least, that Islam needs some sort of reform. This is not sustainable, for a certain percentage of Muslims, no matter how small, to accept this kind of ideology.

Unfortunately Saudi Arabia supports this ideology, they are pretty much where it began to grow after the seizure of the Grand Mosque caused the king basically start supporting this ideology. Now they are to large, and to rich, and to much part of the Saudi Government, and an ally of the US so, what to do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most of the people killed by these extremists are other muslims. You cherry pick the events that involve non-muslims to prove your point.


200 people were killed by ISIS in Baghdad this weekend. Is there a thread on it? No. Is anyone talking about their religious background? No. What is the total of Muslim vs. non-muslims killed by ISIS this week?

This argument is invalid. I see leftists parade this argument out like it shows there isn't an issue with Islam. Most blacks in this country are killed by other blacks. Does that dismiss there is an issue within the culture that needs to be addressed? No it doesn't.

1. Stop calling people "leftists." WTF is that. Is your goal for people to read your post, think "oh, THAT guy" and move along without thinking about what you are saying? Then you are succeeding.

2. Your analogy proves the opposite of what you are saying- there is not something inherently wrong with black people. If you are trying to argue that there is, good luck with that.

3. I sort of agree with your larger point. There IS something going on within Islam. I understand people not wanting to say so, because we are inherently idealistic and unwilling to generalize to that extent, but it seems to me, at least, that Islam needs some sort of reform. This is not sustainable, for a certain percentage of Muslims, no matter how small, to accept this kind of ideology.

Actually....leftists is an appropriate response. The left of today has more in common with the Lennist ideals than they do with classical liberals like John Locke or Thomas Malthus. They believe in highly socialist ideals. So they are leftists in reality.

Analogy is spot on. No one does argue that blacks have a problem. Black on black crime is highly disproportionate. But the point being everyone dismisses that. However, bring up Ismalomc violence and people say , they're mostly killing other Muslims. Yeah and? That doesn't stop the fact that Islam has a problem. Regardless of who is killing who, it's wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most of the people killed by these extremists are other muslims. You cherry pick the events that involve non-muslims to prove your point.


200 people were killed by ISIS in Baghdad this weekend. Is there a thread on it? No. Is anyone talking about their religious background? No. What is the total of Muslim vs. non-muslims killed by ISIS this week?

This argument is invalid. I see leftists parade this argument out like it shows there isn't an issue with Islam. Most blacks in this country are killed by other blacks. Does that dismiss there is an issue within the culture that needs to be addressed? No it doesn't.

According to your logic, we are seeing Christian on Christian violence.

Are they shouting "in the name.of Jesus" ? Must have missed that.

[Anonymous]

Now this guy apparently put his reasons out there .
http://www.sltrib.com/home/4084842-155/story.html

I'd like to know if the first time he was denied the weapon if it was in concert with FBI it simply our gun laws being applied and working. For the second attempt, sounds like the FBI handled it beautifully. He was sold a non functioning weapon and then arrested by FBI. Of course, some here would call that entrapment and perceive a better way of handling it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Most of the people killed by these extremists are other muslims. You cherry pick the events that involve non-muslims to prove your point.


200 people were killed by ISIS in Baghdad this weekend. Is there a thread on it? No. Is anyone talking about their religious background? No. What is the total of Muslim vs. non-muslims killed by ISIS this week?

This argument is invalid. I see leftists parade this argument out like it shows there isn't an issue with Islam. Most blacks in this country are killed by other blacks. Does that dismiss there is an issue within the culture that needs to be addressed? No it doesn't.

According to your logic, we are seeing Christian on Christian violence.

Are they shouting "in the name.of Jesus" ? Must have missed that.

The klan did.

[Anonymous]

You're right, including when they were persecuting other Christians groups. They sound a lot like islamic fascist extremists who will find any justification for their murderous screed and acts. They should be named for what they are, and combatted by everyone.