I am not the PP, but I wanted to actually chime in about Montessori vs. traditional school. What the PP describes was absolutely our experience. DD was in a play-based private daycare/preschool (first the one, then the other) and started in Montessori whens he was 3. Montessori has a very brand-specific academic learning. It is very linear. The cursive letters resulted in DD backtracking on literacy that she'd been developing in her previous class. She was criticized by the guide for not using the materials correctly/appropriately and when I asked what that meant, the guide said that basically, DD was using the materials in a playful way - building block houses with the pink tower, for example - and that that was not appropriate to Montessori. I agree - it's not appropriate to Montessori, but that kind of creative exploration is completely developmentally appropriate for a 3yo. Other programs encourage it. I will say that the practical life skills like polishing and folding and fasteners have come in very handy, but we were glad to leave after a year. |
| My child is in PK3 at a neighborhood DCPS school not well regarded on DCUM. She can write her name and sight read maybe 5 words. She is good on number and letter recognition. SURPRISE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Best perspective I've read on here in a while. |
But then she'll actually really know her letters and will have had a significant improvement in fine motor skills and will also have seen huge gains in math. |