| I think this is one of those issues that we won't agree about. Personally, the fact that they single out one, poor student in DC that accomplished what he should have as a motivated and intelligent student. Why not highlight many DC student accomplishments? I believe the way it's being portrayed suggests that he shouldn't have been able to achieve what he did because of his color, single Mom, etc. As though people expect him & his peers to fail but he succeeded! It seems patronizing and thinly-veiled racism. |
| Good God, all of the tit-for-tat on white versus black. Why don't we call a spade a spade here: I was excited to read this article because it's rare to find a young, black male, growing up in a poor, crime-ridden area and attending a sub-par school where the dropout and graduation rates are well beyond acceptable, succeed against those odds and be accepted to not one but five Ivy League schools. Good for him for persevering. He's a good-news story for Banneker, for the colleges who have accepted him, and, most importantly, for himself. |
Ok, please pay attention: Many people DO believe that Avery should not have been able to achieve what he did because of his color, single-parent family, etc. Many people DO expect kids like him to fail. This viewpoint is indeed patronizing and it's BLATANT racism. Exhibit A: The comment up-thread that suggests that Avery took the seat of 5 more-deserving white kids. That statement alone is racism in it's purest form. Why not highlight "many" DC students' accomplishments? How many poor kids (Ward 8 resident) from single-parent homes do you know who were admitted to 5 Ivy League schools this year? With high board scores and a 4.3 GPA (with an IB diploma to boot)? From a high poverty, Title I school (61% FARMs)? If it's more that 0, please contact the media immediately because I'm sure they'll be happy to do a story on those legions of students as well. |
+1000 except the sub-par school, maybe generally sub-par school system. What more is there to say, really some people on DCUM love misery and are plain racist. |
Banneker is our "stem" school, but the avg SAT score is below the national avg. It is also admission only, and 99% AA. So..... not really possible for kids of any other race to go there, does not look like from the SATs that the kids are all that smart/educated, and it is ranked in US News & World report very very low - type it in, see what you get. The one thing that seems good about this story is that the kid appears like he will be able to hack it in the Ivies although they did not mention what his actual standardized test scores were, but obviously the IB program there cannot possibly be that rigorous or the school would be ranked higher, the SATs would be higher, and the exmissions in general would be better. So I hope he actually can hack it - spelling bees are ultimately about memorizing the spelling of numerous arcane antediluvian words that are no longer in our lexicon, not about intelligence. While people can argue whether SATs measure intelligence, Banneker and SWW's DC CAS scores are fantastic but their ratings nationally suck so we know DC CAS is irrelevant. I just hope he can rapidly compensate for his poor education. I had a lot of friends come in to Princeton having been admitted as Engineers only to realize that they were so far behind they could never catch up, or that they really did not have natural talent they just thought so because they were in a crappy school and they were the best there............... The most important thing I ever did as a Princeton students was be part of a sit in where we demanded a 9th semester of financial aid - so many of these kids come unprepared without realizing it, get paralyzed and fail out, and at the time if they dropped out to avoid having the grades on their transcript or flunked a lot of classes there was no way for them to come back financially. We changed that. But I hope the summer program they offer now to high risk kids (kids from bad high schools, mostly minority, and athletes who got recruited for athletics not academics) is better on education. It certainly gave people a community to commiserate with, but not that many solutions at the time for what really turned out to be shitty educations - not knowing how to write 5 paragraph essays, analyze text, do research, cite sources, much less go from their precalculus classes to calculus at Princeton. That being said, I hear the AP exams are a lot harder now - don't know if it is true - but if it was it would give the schools and the kids another way to evaluate whether or not they were prepared for an Ivy League school. A lot would have benefited from a post senior year at a good school but it wasn't as if they could pay for it. Many rich kids did it to get IN to good colleges after having messed up in high school, but I never heard of any of my friends doing anything - even going to community college might not have been such a bad idea........... |
This kid cannot go to 5 schools, so he will pick one. And so, 4 kids will be picked up from the waitlists and be offered admissions to 4 colleges. The 4 kids who will get these seats may very well be from other races - not just white. So, you are assuming too much. Now, these 5 white kids that you personally know and who you think need to get into an Ivy League college, have not walked in this child's shoes. Even if they have the exact same academic stats, they probably did not have to overcome the extremely uneven playing field that this kid had to - race, SES, school, opportunities, and a single paycheck (and parent). That's what makes what he has achieved incredible. |
Ooooh, darling pp, maybe you had better work on your reading comprehension. |
This kid did IB courses. And the IB exams are graded outside this country - in Europe. SO, it does not matter which school they go to in the US, their papers are being graded by impartial graders outside this country. That is precisely the reason, IB kids have to work so hard because they are not adhering to the standards of the education system here. And AP is easy compared to IB. He will not be needing remedial courses in any Ivy League college he chooses - and that's why they are offering him scholarships. He is more than capable and the college will not have to waste time, energy, money to get him up to par. IF he was a rising sports star and got admissions in the Ivy colleges based on his skills in the sports arena, it would have been more palatable to the haters. To think he made it because of his academic merit is killing these jealous cats! |
Ivies don't offer merit scholarships. His are purely needs-based. |
He was offered admission because of his academic merit, and he was offered scholarships because of need. People are jealous because they are used to seeing many AA students celebrated and getting into colleges because of their sports skills, and being offered need-based scholarships. |
| I thought Banneker was the DCPS Magnet/IB school while McKinley Tech was the STEM school. |
Hmmm. Interesting. I didn't know that. And I'm not being facetious. They're just one datapoint in assessing school quality in our family, but reading in this forum leads one to believe that the CAS scores are everything to most DC parents. Are you saying they're irrelevant in assessing a school's ability to prep kids for college, or something else? I'm more interested in opinions about testing than the scores. I think scores don't tell us enough and the obsession with them is more detrimental than anything else. In NYC, families across every demographic are protesting the testing: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/30/nyregion/standing-up-to-testing.html?ref=nyregion |
|
That's incorrect. Banneker is 87% AA. |
So sad that this celebratory post turned into this sick nonsense (not all posts, but really people). Hope he doesn't read this DCUM shows its true colors.
|