Burn Cain!! Slowly. And. Surely.

[takoma]

Anonymous wrote:I think that "fifth" woman is a real stretch. I believe that Cain has a real issue, but he didn't actually do anything in that story.

Agree! I still think his policy blunders are a much more important story, and this junk is diverting attention.

[Anonymous]

takoma wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think that "fifth" woman is a real stretch. I believe that Cain has a real issue, but he didn't actually do anything in that story.

Agree! I still think his policy blunders are a much more important story, and this junk is diverting attention.

I think they both matter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

takoma wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think that "fifth" woman is a real stretch. I believe that Cain has a real issue, but he didn't actually do anything in that story.

Agree! I still think his policy blunders are a much more important story, and this junk is diverting attention.

I think they both matter.

Yes, it all matters to ALL of us -- Dem or Repub. I agree with many of the issues that the republican party stands for, but I am not going to waste my vote on a candidate just because I happen to be a member of his/her political party. What occurs to me the most as victims continue to air Cain's dirty ways is how much republicans dislike the inevitableness of Romney's rise to the nomination. I am shocked at how long republicans were willing to hold out hope for Cain. He is a lackluster candidate, at best. Only now, with women having practically been forced out of privacy, do polls show Cain's support slipping. So, in the next few months you are going to see republicans FAKE happiness with Romney (another lackluster candidate) and then a few months later they'll hold their noses and vote for him in the spirit of party solidarity. Pathetic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There's a wire service reporting that Penn State's board of trustees has apprpached Cain about becoming university president in the wake of the football scandal.

LOL!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think that "fifth" woman is a real stretch. I believe that Cain has a real issue, but he didn't actually do anything in that story.

Yes, it sounds like Cain may have had bad intentions (he asked the fifth woman to set him up for dinner with a pretty young thing in the audience) but nobody really knows for sure because she wisely declined to set it up. However, he asked her and her friend to go to dinner and then allegedly stuck them with the bill for a $400 bottle of wine that he ordered. Now, i that's true, that's not the kind of person you want in the White House either!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think that "fifth" woman is a real stretch. I believe that Cain has a real issue, but he didn't actually do anything in that story.

I agree. But, Cain is the family guy man who is a reverend/deacon in the church who hits on younger women while wifey holds down the house.

[Anonymous]

the whole thing is bfd to me. soon as there is a credible rape allegation like with Clinton, then it's worth listening to. An even if he raped someone like Clinton did, it isn't disqualifying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:the whole thing is bfd to me. soon as there is a credible rape allegation like with Clinton, then it's worth listening to. An even if he raped someone like Clinton did, it isn't disqualifying.

If the rape charge against Clinton was credible, why did the Republican independent prosecutor turn down this case? Seems odd that your Republican lawyers would miss what is so obvious to you.

[Anonymous]

...and btw nice statement of conservative ethics that you do not think a rape disqualifies Cain from being president.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the whole thing is bfd to me. soon as there is a credible rape allegation like with Clinton, then it's worth listening to. An even if he raped someone like Clinton did, it isn't disqualifying.

If the rape charge against Clinton was credible, why did the Republican independent prosecutor turn down this case? Seems odd that your Republican lawyers would miss what is so obvious to you.

she never went to the cops and he got out of the statute of limitations. She was credible, and not too happy about talking about it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:the whole thing is bfd to me. soon as there is a credible rape allegation like with Clinton, then it's worth listening to. An even if he raped someone like Clinton did, it isn't disqualifying.

Only thing I can hope is that you are a male. Notice, I did not say man. I wonder how you would feel if some curmudgeon stuck his hand up your DD leg and told her he would help her find a job for some hooky. Would you think that person shows the ethics to be president of a university, more less the United States.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:the whole thing is bfd to me. soon as there is a credible rape allegation like with Clinton, then it's worth listening to. An even if he raped someone like Clinton did, it isn't disqualifying.

If the rape charge against Clinton was credible, why did the Republican independent prosecutor turn down this case? Seems odd that your Republican lawyers would miss what is so obvious to you.

she never went to the cops and he got out of the statute of limitations. She was credible, and not too happy about talking about it.

Lie.

[Anonymous]

Why did the moderator get booed for asking a question about the sexual harrassment allegations against Cain? Do republicans not care about character anymore? Or, are we watching double-standard application 101?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I assume the poster meant enter Cain's sexually harrassed victim number 4. Now will there be a fifth victim.

Yes, I wanted to know what "red" and "blue" meant. Nice take on the dem/repub colors, Takoma. c: And yes, I was referring to Cain's alleged victim #4, and wondering if there will be more. And, finally, FWIW, I'm a "he".

I'm kinda wishing that the 4th alleged victim didn't select Gloria as her counsel. Nothing against Gloria, but I worry that it could become more sensationalized. Thoughts?

On one hand it makes me question their motives. But on another, this woman isn't suing Cain and so she needs a good attorney who will work for free. The only ones willing to do that are the lawyers who benefit from the publicity, like Allred.

Ahh, very good. Thanks.

Aaaand here is why she needs a high profile attorney: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45249802/ns/politics-decision_2012/#.TryXUmC4Jl0

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is now a fifth woman who has come out. This one occurred in 2003.

Where is this reported?

http://www.thefrisky.com/2011-11-08/fifth-woman-donna-donella-accuses-herman-cain-of-sexual-harassment/

Never clicked through the link, but I worry when our NEWS comes from "thefrisky.com" - seriously?