UT Austin is Overrated

[Anonymous]

UT is a great option for in-state resident students who know exactly what they want to major in.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What you don’t understand is that DCUM only loves prestigious schools. As long as UT Austin is on the top 10-20 whatever list status seeking parents will love that school. Most state flagships accept their own state students from a variety of high schools. Their admission criteria for their instate students are much lower. This is true for UVA, Michigan, Berkely, GTech, etc.. but some parents prefer spending more on college for slightly better ranked schools. So parents send their kids to UT Austin or Michigan over UMD.. or Michigan over UVa or UVA over UMD.. or Wisconsin over UMD.. get it? Its about perceived prestige.

GA Tech is not an easier admit for in-state students.

UGA’s acceptance rate is below 30%, too.

C'mon now with that nonsense. The in-state acceptance rate at UGA is over 40% acceptance rate. Georgia Tech Overall acceptance rate is around 12% In-state this cycle was 28% still slightly less than UGA's Overall acceptance rate of in-state and OOS.

Your stats are outdated. UGA is below 40 in-state now.

The vast majority of in-state applicants that apply to UGA do so Early Action. It was a 45% acceptance rate this cycle. So, you apply early action like most GA residents that's your chance of getting in.

https://www.admissions.uga.edu/blog/2026-ea-in-state-decisions/

Post the latest stats that show the final numbers.

lol No post the numbers showing it's below 40%. The numbers above are real. You've shown nothing to suggest it's under 40%. Show it.

Nah you made the claim then posted outdated stats. I’ll let you sit with being unable to prove your claim.

Lol No you said it’s under 40. lol show it. You can’t because it ain’t so Show your work. Just showed you 45% EA in- state the vast majority were accepted early action. So you are from GA and want to go there - have your kid apply EA they have a 45% chance at acceptance

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:UT is not just like other state schools. UT Austin has the most valuable athletic department, revenue from 2.1 million acres of land (including oil and gas), the largest university art museum, the first photograph, one of only 21 extant Gutenberg bibles, papers of Woodward and Bernstein, Robert De Niro, Lorne Michaels, T.S. Eliot, Arthur Miller, Harry Houdini, etc., etc.

How many state schools can match these notable alumni?:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_University_of_Texas_at_Austin_alumni

I find it weird how American universities value football so much, almost to the point where football is more important than academics.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:UT is not just like other state schools. UT Austin has the most valuable athletic department, revenue from 2.1 million acres of land (including oil and gas), the largest university art museum, the first photograph, one of only 21 extant Gutenberg bibles, papers of Woodward and Bernstein, Robert De Niro, Lorne Michaels, T.S. Eliot, Arthur Miller, Harry Houdini, etc., etc.

How many state schools can match these notable alumni?:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_University_of_Texas_at_Austin_alumni

I find it weird how American universities value football so much, almost to the point where football is more important than academics.

And yet, with NIL and the generous transfer portal, major college sports has almost nothing to do with college now. Players have no loyalty and are hardly students in the traditional sense. To paraphrase a Seinfeld joke, we're rooting for the uniform.

[Anonymous]

Sure it is. College in general is overrated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t get the hype. What am I missing? Academics are decent but no better than a slightly above average flagship. They guarantee admission to a percentage of every high school in the state, so a lot of kids from weak high schools get to attend. The campus isn’t defined and is ugly. And finally, Austin isn’t even a college town, it’s a small city better suited for grad students.

The automatic admission is limited to the top 5%, and even that is not for every college/program, some of which are legitimately very highly regarded. The campus is quite nice with is big oaks and Spanish colonial style. Calling the 11th biggest city in the USA a "small city" is a decent mischaracterization, but it is indeed more than a college town; it has a campus and student area that is quite college town like, it has tremendous industry and government opportunities from its silicon hills and state capital status, full of music arts and good food. Hell of an alumni network, too.

If you are VA resident, though, I agree it wouldn't pull me away from UVA.

The campus is OK. Very dry area and not a lot of greenery accept for entry rectangular quad and that's not very big. Just sayin.

+100 Austin is fine but extremely overrated. There is nothing in Austin not found in Richmond. Nothing at UT not found at UVA. And the Texas landscape is very ugly compared to the mountains.

Let's not kid ourselves. Music, food, bars, and college sports are much, much better in Austin than in Richmond/Charlottesville.

Music Food and Bars is not a unique thing.

That's why people like Toledo as much as New York, right?

Now you’re being obtuse comparing a huge city to a small city.

The point is all college towns have music, food and bars. Other urban cities in the south also are home to flagship universities. The University of South Carolina has SEC sports in an urban environment just like UT.

I don't think I'm being obtuse. The unstated assumption seems to be that any two places with music, food, and bars are roughly equivalent. (Why have a Michelin-starred meal in NYC when you can have Applebee's in Toledo, amirite?) The quality of of the music, food, and bars matters. Austin punches well above its weight in terms of cultural offerings. It has world-class music on a nightly basis as well as major music and film festivals and an F1 race. It's also well known for its food, particularly BBQ and Tex Mex (both of which are infinitely better than whatever iterations are available in the DMV). I know several people from the East and West Coasts who visit Austin recreationally. Do many people in New York or Boston take vacations in Richmond or Charlottesville?

Mind you, I think Charlottesville is pretty cool and Richmond is fine. But Austin offers certain things that they don't.

Virginia has all of that and yes, I do know people that vacation to Virginia. Charlottesville and Richmond are not Applebees’s.

Good lord.

Companies now headquartered in Austin include Tesla, Oracle, Dell, AMD and Austin is home to Apple's second largest campus.

AMS is headquartered in Santa Clara, not Austin. Also, the truth is that Oracle, and Tesla have few people in Austin. Elon recently admitted that Tesla and SpaceX have trouble getting people to move to Texas.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:UT is not just like other state schools. UT Austin has the most valuable athletic department, revenue from 2.1 million acres of land (including oil and gas), the largest university art museum, the first photograph, one of only 21 extant Gutenberg bibles, papers of Woodward and Bernstein, Robert De Niro, Lorne Michaels, T.S. Eliot, Arthur Miller, Harry Houdini, etc., etc.

How many state schools can match these notable alumni?:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_University_of_Texas_at_Austin_alumni

I find it weird how American universities value football so much, almost to the point where football is more important than academics.

Not all, but yes it is backwards.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What you don’t understand is that DCUM only loves prestigious schools. As long as UT Austin is on the top 10-20 whatever list status seeking parents will love that school. Most state flagships accept their own state students from a variety of high schools. Their admission criteria for their instate students are much lower. This is true for UVA, Michigan, Berkely, GTech, etc.. but some parents prefer spending more on college for slightly better ranked schools. So parents send their kids to UT Austin or Michigan over UMD.. or Michigan over UVa or UVA over UMD.. or Wisconsin over UMD.. get it? Its about perceived prestige.

GA Tech is not an easier admit for in-state students.

UGA’s acceptance rate is below 30%, too.

C'mon now with that nonsense. The in-state acceptance rate at UGA is over 40% acceptance rate. Georgia Tech Overall acceptance rate is around 12% In-state this cycle was 28% still slightly less than UGA's Overall acceptance rate of in-state and OOS.

Your stats are outdated. UGA is below 40 in-state now.

The vast majority of in-state applicants that apply to UGA do so Early Action. It was a 45% acceptance rate this cycle. So, you apply early action like most GA residents that's your chance of getting in.

https://www.admissions.uga.edu/blog/2026-ea-in-state-decisions/

Post the latest stats that show the final numbers.

lol No post the numbers showing it's below 40%. The numbers above are real. You've shown nothing to suggest it's under 40%. Show it.

Nah you made the claim then posted outdated stats. I’ll let you sit with being unable to prove your claim.

Lol No you said it’s under 40. lol show it. You can’t because it ain’t so Show your work. Just showed you 45% EA in- state the vast majority were accepted early action. So you are from GA and want to go there - have your kid apply EA they have a 45% chance at acceptance

lol No I’ll choose to live rent free in your head, little bro.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What you don’t understand is that DCUM only loves prestigious schools. As long as UT Austin is on the top 10-20 whatever list status seeking parents will love that school. Most state flagships accept their own state students from a variety of high schools. Their admission criteria for their instate students are much lower. This is true for UVA, Michigan, Berkely, GTech, etc.. but some parents prefer spending more on college for slightly better ranked schools. So parents send their kids to UT Austin or Michigan over UMD.. or Michigan over UVa or UVA over UMD.. or Wisconsin over UMD.. get it? Its about perceived prestige.

GA Tech is not an easier admit for in-state students.

UGA’s acceptance rate is below 30%, too.

C'mon now with that nonsense. The in-state acceptance rate at UGA is over 40% acceptance rate. Georgia Tech Overall acceptance rate is around 12% In-state this cycle was 28% still slightly less than UGA's Overall acceptance rate of in-state and OOS.

Your stats are outdated. UGA is below 40 in-state now.

The vast majority of in-state applicants that apply to UGA do so Early Action. It was a 45% acceptance rate this cycle. So, you apply early action like most GA residents that's your chance of getting in.

https://www.admissions.uga.edu/blog/2026-ea-in-state-decisions/

Post the latest stats that show the final numbers.

lol No post the numbers showing it's below 40%. The numbers above are real. You've shown nothing to suggest it's under 40%. Show it.

Nah you made the claim then posted outdated stats. I’ll let you sit with being unable to prove your claim.

Lol No you said it’s under 40. lol show it. You can’t because it ain’t so Show your work. Just showed you 45% EA in- state the vast majority were accepted early action. So you are from GA and want to go there - have your kid apply EA they have a 45% chance at acceptance

The most recent blog post shows an overall acceptance rate of about 30%. Common sense suggests that if the EA in-state rate was higher, the RD in-state rate would have to be lower to get to an overall rate of 30%. The OOS acceptance rate is probably 20-25%.

DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What you don’t understand is that DCUM only loves prestigious schools. As long as UT Austin is on the top 10-20 whatever list status seeking parents will love that school. Most state flagships accept their own state students from a variety of high schools. Their admission criteria for their instate students are much lower. This is true for UVA, Michigan, Berkely, GTech, etc.. but some parents prefer spending more on college for slightly better ranked schools. So parents send their kids to UT Austin or Michigan over UMD.. or Michigan over UVa or UVA over UMD.. or Wisconsin over UMD.. get it? Its about perceived prestige.

GA Tech is not an easier admit for in-state students.

UGA’s acceptance rate is below 30%, too.

C'mon now with that nonsense. The in-state acceptance rate at UGA is over 40% acceptance rate. Georgia Tech Overall acceptance rate is around 12% In-state this cycle was 28% still slightly less than UGA's Overall acceptance rate of in-state and OOS.

Your stats are outdated. UGA is below 40 in-state now.

The vast majority of in-state applicants that apply to UGA do so Early Action. It was a 45% acceptance rate this cycle. So, you apply early action like most GA residents that's your chance of getting in.

https://www.admissions.uga.edu/blog/2026-ea-in-state-decisions/

Post the latest stats that show the final numbers.

lol No post the numbers showing it's below 40%. The numbers above are real. You've shown nothing to suggest it's under 40%. Show it.

Nah you made the claim then posted outdated stats. I’ll let you sit with being unable to prove your claim.

Lol No you said it’s under 40. lol show it. You can’t because it ain’t so Show your work. Just showed you 45% EA in- state the vast majority were accepted early action. So you are from GA and want to go there - have your kid apply EA they have a 45% chance at acceptance

lol No I’ll choose to live rent free in your head, little bro.

lol not at all. You just like making stuff up. It's all good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What you don’t understand is that DCUM only loves prestigious schools. As long as UT Austin is on the top 10-20 whatever list status seeking parents will love that school. Most state flagships accept their own state students from a variety of high schools. Their admission criteria for their instate students are much lower. This is true for UVA, Michigan, Berkely, GTech, etc.. but some parents prefer spending more on college for slightly better ranked schools. So parents send their kids to UT Austin or Michigan over UMD.. or Michigan over UVa or UVA over UMD.. or Wisconsin over UMD.. get it? Its about perceived prestige.

GA Tech is not an easier admit for in-state students.

UGA’s acceptance rate is below 30%, too.

C'mon now with that nonsense. The in-state acceptance rate at UGA is over 40% acceptance rate. Georgia Tech Overall acceptance rate is around 12% In-state this cycle was 28% still slightly less than UGA's Overall acceptance rate of in-state and OOS.

Your stats are outdated. UGA is below 40 in-state now.

The vast majority of in-state applicants that apply to UGA do so Early Action. It was a 45% acceptance rate this cycle. So, you apply early action like most GA residents that's your chance of getting in.

https://www.admissions.uga.edu/blog/2026-ea-in-state-decisions/

Post the latest stats that show the final numbers.

lol No post the numbers showing it's below 40%. The numbers above are real. You've shown nothing to suggest it's under 40%. Show it.

Nah you made the claim then posted outdated stats. I’ll let you sit with being unable to prove your claim.

Lol No you said it’s under 40. lol show it. You can’t because it ain’t so Show your work. Just showed you 45% EA in- state the vast majority were accepted early action. So you are from GA and want to go there - have your kid apply EA they have a 45% chance at acceptance

The most recent blog post shows an overall acceptance rate of about 30%. Common sense suggests that if the EA in-state rate was higher, the RD in-state rate would have to be lower to get to an overall rate of 30%. The OOS acceptance rate is probably 20-25%.

DP

apply EA like most in staters 45% acceptance rate. So, even if you add regular admissions, it's splits 80% in-state admit to 20% OOS add that with the small minority of in-staters that actually apply regular as a back-up school then common sense would say it's above 40% even then. Again, moot point, like most Georgia applicants apply EA and you have a whopping 45% acceptance chance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t get the hype. What am I missing? Academics are decent but no better than a slightly above average flagship. They guarantee admission to a percentage of every high school in the state, so a lot of kids from weak high schools get to attend. The campus isn’t defined and is ugly. And finally, Austin isn’t even a college town, it’s a small city better suited for grad students.

The automatic admission is limited to the top 5%, and even that is not for every college/program, some of which are legitimately very highly regarded. The campus is quite nice with is big oaks and Spanish colonial style. Calling the 11th biggest city in the USA a "small city" is a decent mischaracterization, but it is indeed more than a college town; it has a campus and student area that is quite college town like, it has tremendous industry and government opportunities from its silicon hills and state capital status, full of music arts and good food. Hell of an alumni network, too.

If you are VA resident, though, I agree it wouldn't pull me away from UVA.

The campus is OK. Very dry area and not a lot of greenery accept for entry rectangular quad and that's not very big. Just sayin.

+100 Austin is fine but extremely overrated. There is nothing in Austin not found in Richmond. Nothing at UT not found at UVA. And the Texas landscape is very ugly compared to the mountains.

Let's not kid ourselves. Music, food, bars, and college sports are much, much better in Austin than in Richmond/Charlottesville.

Music Food and Bars is not a unique thing.

That's why people like Toledo as much as New York, right?

Now you’re being obtuse comparing a huge city to a small city.

The point is all college towns have music, food and bars. Other urban cities in the south also are home to flagship universities. The University of South Carolina has SEC sports in an urban environment just like UT.

I don't think I'm being obtuse. The unstated assumption seems to be that any two places with music, food, and bars are roughly equivalent. (Why have a Michelin-starred meal in NYC when you can have Applebee's in Toledo, amirite?) The quality of of the music, food, and bars matters. Austin punches well above its weight in terms of cultural offerings. It has world-class music on a nightly basis as well as major music and film festivals and an F1 race. It's also well known for its food, particularly BBQ and Tex Mex (both of which are infinitely better than whatever iterations are available in the DMV). I know several people from the East and West Coasts who visit Austin recreationally. Do many people in New York or Boston take vacations in Richmond or Charlottesville?

Mind you, I think Charlottesville is pretty cool and Richmond is fine. But Austin offers certain things that they don't.

Virginia has all of that and yes, I do know people that vacation to Virginia. Charlottesville and Richmond are not Applebees’s.

Good lord.

Companies now headquartered in Austin include Tesla, Oracle, Dell, AMD and Austin is home to Apple's second largest campus.

AMS is headquartered in Santa Clara, not Austin. Also, the truth is that Oracle, and Tesla have few people in Austin. Elon recently admitted that Tesla and SpaceX have trouble getting people to move to Texas.

AMD is technically headquartered in Santa Clara, but Lisa Su lives in Austin and runs the company from AMD's Austin offices.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What you don’t understand is that DCUM only loves prestigious schools. As long as UT Austin is on the top 10-20 whatever list status seeking parents will love that school. Most state flagships accept their own state students from a variety of high schools. Their admission criteria for their instate students are much lower. This is true for UVA, Michigan, Berkely, GTech, etc.. but some parents prefer spending more on college for slightly better ranked schools. So parents send their kids to UT Austin or Michigan over UMD.. or Michigan over UVa or UVA over UMD.. or Wisconsin over UMD.. get it? Its about perceived prestige.

GA Tech is not an easier admit for in-state students.

UGA’s acceptance rate is below 30%, too.

C'mon now with that nonsense. The in-state acceptance rate at UGA is over 40% acceptance rate. Georgia Tech Overall acceptance rate is around 12% In-state this cycle was 28% still slightly less than UGA's Overall acceptance rate of in-state and OOS.

Your stats are outdated. UGA is below 40 in-state now.

The vast majority of in-state applicants that apply to UGA do so Early Action. It was a 45% acceptance rate this cycle. So, you apply early action like most GA residents that's your chance of getting in.

https://www.admissions.uga.edu/blog/2026-ea-in-state-decisions/

Post the latest stats that show the final numbers.

lol No post the numbers showing it's below 40%. The numbers above are real. You've shown nothing to suggest it's under 40%. Show it.

Nah you made the claim then posted outdated stats. I’ll let you sit with being unable to prove your claim.

Lol No you said it’s under 40. lol show it. You can’t because it ain’t so Show your work. Just showed you 45% EA in- state the vast majority were accepted early action. So you are from GA and want to go there - have your kid apply EA they have a 45% chance at acceptance

lol No I’ll choose to live rent free in your head, little bro.

lol not at all. You just like making stuff up. It's all good.

Pipe down, little bro!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What you don’t understand is that DCUM only loves prestigious schools. As long as UT Austin is on the top 10-20 whatever list status seeking parents will love that school. Most state flagships accept their own state students from a variety of high schools. Their admission criteria for their instate students are much lower. This is true for UVA, Michigan, Berkely, GTech, etc.. but some parents prefer spending more on college for slightly better ranked schools. So parents send their kids to UT Austin or Michigan over UMD.. or Michigan over UVa or UVA over UMD.. or Wisconsin over UMD.. get it? Its about perceived prestige.

GA Tech is not an easier admit for in-state students.

UGA’s acceptance rate is below 30%, too.

C'mon now with that nonsense. The in-state acceptance rate at UGA is over 40% acceptance rate. Georgia Tech Overall acceptance rate is around 12% In-state this cycle was 28% still slightly less than UGA's Overall acceptance rate of in-state and OOS.

Your stats are outdated. UGA is below 40 in-state now.

The vast majority of in-state applicants that apply to UGA do so Early Action. It was a 45% acceptance rate this cycle. So, you apply early action like most GA residents that's your chance of getting in.

https://www.admissions.uga.edu/blog/2026-ea-in-state-decisions/

Post the latest stats that show the final numbers.

lol No post the numbers showing it's below 40%. The numbers above are real. You've shown nothing to suggest it's under 40%. Show it.

Nah you made the claim then posted outdated stats. I’ll let you sit with being unable to prove your claim.

Lol No you said it’s under 40. lol show it. You can’t because it ain’t so Show your work. Just showed you 45% EA in- state the vast majority were accepted early action. So you are from GA and want to go there - have your kid apply EA they have a 45% chance at acceptance

The most recent blog post shows an overall acceptance rate of about 30%. Common sense suggests that if the EA in-state rate was higher, the RD in-state rate would have to be lower to get to an overall rate of 30%. The OOS acceptance rate is probably 20-25%.

DP

apply EA like most in staters 45% acceptance rate. So, even if you add regular admissions, it's splits 80% in-state admit to 20% OOS add that with the small minority of in-staters that actually apply regular as a back-up school then common sense would say it's above 40% even then. Again, moot point, like most Georgia applicants apply EA and you have a whopping 45% acceptance chance.

Nope Your math is wrong. It’s probably about 38% in-state overall after you account for the app in increase.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What you don’t understand is that DCUM only loves prestigious schools. As long as UT Austin is on the top 10-20 whatever list status seeking parents will love that school. Most state flagships accept their own state students from a variety of high schools. Their admission criteria for their instate students are much lower. This is true for UVA, Michigan, Berkely, GTech, etc.. but some parents prefer spending more on college for slightly better ranked schools. So parents send their kids to UT Austin or Michigan over UMD.. or Michigan over UVa or UVA over UMD.. or Wisconsin over UMD.. get it? Its about perceived prestige.

GA Tech is not an easier admit for in-state students.

UGA’s acceptance rate is below 30%, too.

C'mon now with that nonsense. The in-state acceptance rate at UGA is over 40% acceptance rate. Georgia Tech Overall acceptance rate is around 12% In-state this cycle was 28% still slightly less than UGA's Overall acceptance rate of in-state and OOS.

Your stats are outdated. UGA is below 40 in-state now.

The vast majority of in-state applicants that apply to UGA do so Early Action. It was a 45% acceptance rate this cycle. So, you apply early action like most GA residents that's your chance of getting in.

https://www.admissions.uga.edu/blog/2026-ea-in-state-decisions/

Post the latest stats that show the final numbers.

lol No post the numbers showing it's below 40%. The numbers above are real. You've shown nothing to suggest it's under 40%. Show it.

Nah you made the claim then posted outdated stats. I’ll let you sit with being unable to prove your claim.

Lol No you said it’s under 40. lol show it. You can’t because it ain’t so Show your work. Just showed you 45% EA in- state the vast majority were accepted early action. So you are from GA and want to go there - have your kid apply EA they have a 45% chance at acceptance

lol No I’ll choose to live rent free in your head, little bro.

lol not at all. You just like making stuff up. It's all good.

Pipe down, little bro!!

C'mon bra. We aret talking about Top 10 Publics in this thread like UT-Austin or UVA. Go find your thread.