Epstein letter: Trump knew

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It might stop Trump from pardoning Maxwell. I consider that a win


No. It won't. This is s blackmail from her cushy prison. Trump is on the horns of a dilemma--the devil or the deep blue sea--which will he choose.

I would bet a lot of money that she has instructed her attorneys and family to release everything in the event if her death.


I actually doubt Maxwell is behind this particular release, because the emails prove she did things she’s never admitted to in court. I.e, the emails show Epstein telling Wolff that she was definitely poaching girls at MaL, her emails with Epstein show them discussing pedo ring operations like Trump spending hours with a girl at Epstein’s house, and so on. Why would she put these sensational proofs of her own guilt out in public if she wants to be released?

House Oversight dems say they got the emails by suing Epstein’s estate for them.

I think/hope House Dems are releasing these tip-of-the-iceberg teasers for several different threads: 1. Trump knew about Epstein; 2. Trump had sex with one of Epstein’s girls in 2012, four years after Epstein’s first conviction, and 3. Maxwell is guilty as hell so don’t release her. Stay tuned!
Anonymous
Thinking about the girl Trump met “for hours” in Epstein’s house in 2012, I don’t think it was Giuffre. She was born in 1983, which would have made her 29 in 2012. Too old for Trump. Unless he was arranging to pay her off or something.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:GO MR. PRESIDENT!! These Democrats have so much poor explanation on this entire Epstein bulldung. I bet if every Democrat were to use Epstein as an excuse I would be a millionaire in about a few months.


Anyone who covers for a pedophile must also be pedophile.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Thinking about the girl Trump met “for hours” in Epstein’s house in 2012, I don’t think it was Giuffre. She was born in 1983, which would have made her 29 in 2012. Too old for Trump. Unless he was arranging to pay her off or something.


At the WH press conference today, Karoline Leavitt claimed that the unredacted emails are available and say that the specific girl is Guiffre, who publicly stated Trump was never improper with her. So their story is that Democrats deliberately redacted the girl's name to make it sound worse when Trump is already 'cleared' per this victim.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:GO MR. PRESIDENT!! These Democrats have so much poor explanation on this entire Epstein bulldung. I bet if every Democrat were to use Epstein as an excuse I would be a millionaire in about a few months.


Anyone who covers for a pedophile must also be pedophile.


Trump had a shared interests with Epstein.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Thinking about the girl Trump met “for hours” in Epstein’s house in 2012, I don’t think it was Giuffre. She was born in 1983, which would have made her 29 in 2012. Too old for Trump. Unless he was arranging to pay her off or something.


I just finished reading her book and she left in 2002 so the Republicans are lying again.

AI generated
,"Virginia Giuffre's association with Jeffrey Epstein ended in 2002 or early 2003.

In late 2002, while on a trip to Thailand that Epstein had arranged for her to take a massage training class, she met and fell in love with an Australian man whom she married 10 days later. She decided not to return to Epstein's operation as planned and instead moved with her new husband to Australia to start a family, cutting off all contact with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
According to Giuffre's later accounts, Epstein had already begun to lose interest in her by 2003 because he felt she was getting "too old" for him."



Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Thinking about the girl Trump met “for hours” in Epstein’s house in 2012, I don’t think it was Giuffre. She was born in 1983, which would have made her 29 in 2012. Too old for Trump. Unless he was arranging to pay her off or something.


At the WH press conference today, Karoline Leavitt claimed that the unredacted emails are available and say that the specific girl is Guiffre, who publicly stated Trump was never improper with her. So their story is that Democrats deliberately redacted the girl's name to make it sound worse when Trump is already 'cleared' per this victim.


So easy to point to Guiffre, as she's, you know, well, um, dead. Try again, Karoline. It's ok to admit you work for a perv. You can't bow out and distance yourself as any woman with morals would do.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:It might stop Trump from pardoning Maxwell. I consider that a win


No. It won't. This is s blackmail from her cushy prison. Trump is on the horns of a dilemma--the devil or the deep blue sea--which will he choose.

I would bet a lot of money that she has instructed her attorneys and family to release everything in the event if her death.


I actually doubt Maxwell is behind this particular release, because the emails prove she did things she’s never admitted to in court. I.e, the emails show Epstein telling Wolff that she was definitely poaching girls at MaL, her emails with Epstein show them discussing pedo ring operations like Trump spending hours with a girl at Epstein’s house, and so on. Why would she put these sensational proofs of her own guilt out in public if she wants to be released?

House Oversight dems say they got the emails by suing Epstein’s estate for them.

I think/hope House Dems are releasing these tip-of-the-iceberg teasers for several different threads: 1. Trump knew about Epstein; 2. Trump had sex with one of Epstein’s girls in 2012, four years after Epstein’s first conviction, and 3. Maxwell is guilty as hell so don’t release her. Stay tuned!


The House Dems got a batch from the epstein estate. It is a good way of measuring that what the DOJ eventually releases has integrity. The DOJ doesn't know what the house dems have or don't have and if there is a single discrepency, the pitchforks will come out.
Anonymous
From the NYT article. Telling…

“Republicans on the Oversight Committee accused Democrats of politicizing the investigation.”
Anonymous
The usual clowns with more bs... The name of the victim Trump spent “hours with” was redacted by Dems. This was done intentionally. It’s Virginia Giuffre, her identify was unmasked by Republicans. Why did Dems conceal her ID??? Bc Giuffre praised Trump in her book as having done nothing wrong. These people are animals.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The usual clowns with more bs... The name of the victim Trump spent “hours with” was redacted by Dems. This was done intentionally. It’s Virginia Giuffre, her identify was unmasked by Republicans. Why did Dems conceal her ID??? Bc Giuffre praised Trump in her book as having done nothing wrong. These people are animals.



That’s untrue. She did not praise him.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Will anything actually come of this?

nope. trump could rape a baby on fifth avenue and people would still support him.


This. Not happening. I just posted that MAGA GOP claimed this was solely political maneuvering, INSTEAD of a massive coverup of a massive crime ring that preyed on girls and young women.

MAGA GOP are sickening.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:GO MR. PRESIDENT!! These Democrats have so much poor explanation on this entire Epstein bulldung. I bet if every Democrat were to use Epstein as an excuse I would be a millionaire in about a few months.


What a sad little weasel you must be. And the saying you mean is "If I had a dime for every..." not "I bet if every Democrat were to use Epstein as an excuse," dummy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:The usual clowns with more bs... The name of the victim Trump spent “hours with” was redacted by Dems. This was done intentionally. It’s Virginia Giuffre, her identify was unmasked by Republicans. Why did Dems conceal her ID??? Bc Giuffre praised Trump in her book as having done nothing wrong. These people are animals.


So are you saying you're fine with his pedophilia?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Narrator: Just wait till the pictures and video come out


Let the leaks begin…
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: