Yes, freshmen are the ones who consistently get decent hot breakfasts daily. Why on earth would only two upperclassman dorms, out of 12, have some hot options. I wonder if those are the two where athletes are concentrated. Warm breakfast sandwiches was the concession for the rest? We are talking about a filthy rich university. It's embarrassing how little they care about UGs, across the board. My kid, at a far less wealthy school, has an array of pancakes, waffles, omelettes or other egg dishes, breakfast meats etc. daily. |
Yep. And the poors would sleep in tents and eat gruel if the outcome was a Harvard degree. |
+1, Duke alum here, and you just made me nostalgic for Wild Bull's and the Oak Room! |
Malcolm Gladwell writes about this conundrum in one of this books. Basically, colleges have to balance providing good food versus providing financial aid. If economic diversity (e.g.) is important to the school, the school will favor pitting its resources towards attracting through scholarships the student body it wants versus funding the cafeteria. |
| *putting |
Flagships are cheaper and likely naturally attract a diverse student body, so they can point their endowment to food (like UMass does). |
That was his premise, but it was false. |
This doesn't really make sense. You can factually have enough money to have good financial resources and good food. |
It might apply to some schools, but to the richest college in the world? Nope, not buying it. If every other Ivy can manage hot breakfasts for all students on weekdays, so can Harvard. They choose not to. |
My DD is at UMass. We were visiting there recently and I can personally confirm that it is very good. |