Ruling on MCPS LGBT curriculum case coming this morning

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is so much being deleted from this thread? Like direct quotes from the dissent.

My comment praising common sense prevailing was deleted! Sheesh!

All social media is left moderatored (except X). If you post a counterpoint to the left narrative you are a bigot, racist, xenophobe and the comment gets deleted.

To the left - keep acting like this. You will never win another general election.

[Anonymous]

I don’t agree with parents who want to remove their kids from this portion of the curriculum, but I don’t think we should be limiting parents’ rights either. Honestly if you are shielding your kid this much from the true facts of how the world is, you’re not doing them any favors but it’s your right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Late to the game here. So the main implication is that parents can keep kids home on the days any LGBTQ books are read? I'm a teacher and my worry is that schools will have to figure out a place for kids to be during that particular lesson. But heck yeah, if parents want to keep their kids home, then fine. I'll plan to do same sex family read alouds every Friday and the horrible families can find childcare for 20% of the year. Hope it bankrupts them.

Hate is hate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Late to the game here. So the main implication is that parents can keep kids home on the days any LGBTQ books are read? I'm a teacher and my worry is that schools will have to figure out a place for kids to be during that particular lesson. But heck yeah, if parents want to keep their kids home, then fine. I'll plan to do same sex family read alouds every Friday and the horrible families can find childcare for 20% of the year. Hope it bankrupts them.

How tolerant of you!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Late to the game here. So the main implication is that parents can keep kids home on the days any LGBTQ books are read? I'm a teacher and my worry is that schools will have to figure out a place for kids to be during that particular lesson. But heck yeah, if parents want to keep their kids home, then fine. I'll plan to do same sex family read alouds every Friday and the horrible families can find childcare for 20% of the year. Hope it bankrupts them.

You are a garbage teacher.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Late to the game here. So the main implication is that parents can keep kids home on the days any LGBTQ books are read? I'm a teacher and my worry is that schools will have to figure out a place for kids to be during that particular lesson. But heck yeah, if parents want to keep their kids home, then fine. I'll plan to do same sex family read alouds every Friday and the horrible families can find childcare for 20% of the year. Hope it bankrupts them.

You are a garbage teacher.

No, they're a great teacher, teaching kids that people of various types exist. You're a garbage person.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://www.yahoo.com/news/supreme-court-sides-religious-parents-145321464.html

parents won.

If you don't want your kid to learn about science or see female teachers, then you can keep your kids at home, just like these parents.

No no the SC says that my kid can opt out of anything I find religiously objectionable. That includes female teachers. The school must make a male-only space for mg child.

No, SCOTUS said they can keep the kids home. You can too.

MCPS’ argument here was that it is excessively burdensome to notify every time a potentially objectionable book would be read and then to accommodate those who are opting out. The effect of this is going to be they just stop including these books.

But how will our kids survive without having "Pride Puppy" read aloud to them??

Not everyone wants curriculum choices driven by the lowest common denominator of what doesn’t bother nutjobs

I think the nutjobs are the ones who want pre-K children taught that doctors "guess" whether it's a boy or girl when a baby is born.

what the actual f are you talking about ?
-mcps pk teacher

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I still don’t see how this is going to work. Mcps 4th grader social studies teaches the kids what it means to be “two spirited”.
This isn’t shared with parents beforehand or even after.

I guess you are going to have to understand social studies. Know what is being taught and figure out what is "against your religion"... but I'm not sure how learning Native Americans believe people may has a masculine and feminine spirit is against your religion but sure... go for it.

[Anonymous]

MCPS and the BOE overrreached and they deserved this ruling.

MCPS had no reason to extend and the. Revoke the opt-out. If they had just left their original approach intact, this wouldn’t have gone to the Supreme Court.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Late to the game here. So the main implication is that parents can keep kids home on the days any LGBTQ books are read? I'm a teacher and my worry is that schools will have to figure out a place for kids to be during that particular lesson. But heck yeah, if parents want to keep their kids home, then fine. I'll plan to do same sex family read alouds every Friday and the horrible families can find childcare for 20% of the year. Hope it bankrupts them.

This was my question too. The original ask was for MCPS to find and alternate lesson for the kids during this time, but if they are to stay home "unexcused"... I'd read same sex books every day.

We know the MoCo attorneys that represent MCPS are notoriously slow learners, but I really doubt even they are going to countenance retaliatory harassment against plaintiffs that just won at SCOTUS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Late to the game here. So the main implication is that parents can keep kids home on the days any LGBTQ books are read? I'm a teacher and my worry is that schools will have to figure out a place for kids to be during that particular lesson. But heck yeah, if parents want to keep their kids home, then fine. I'll plan to do same sex family read alouds every Friday and the horrible families can find childcare for 20% of the year. Hope it bankrupts them.

You are a garbage teacher.

That's the religious spirit. Bless your heart!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Late to the game here. So the main implication is that parents can keep kids home on the days any LGBTQ books are read? I'm a teacher and my worry is that schools will have to figure out a place for kids to be during that particular lesson. But heck yeah, if parents want to keep their kids home, then fine. I'll plan to do same sex family read alouds every Friday and the horrible families can find childcare for 20% of the year. Hope it bankrupts them.

You are a garbage teacher.

No, they're a great teacher, teaching kids that people of various types exist. You're a garbage person.

Why teach kindergarteners and 1st graders about sexual orientation? Do they do sex-ed at that age?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Late to the game here. So the main implication is that parents can keep kids home on the days any LGBTQ books are read? I'm a teacher and my worry is that schools will have to figure out a place for kids to be during that particular lesson. But heck yeah, if parents want to keep their kids home, then fine. I'll plan to do same sex family read alouds every Friday and the horrible families can find childcare for 20% of the year. Hope it bankrupts them.

This was my question too. The original ask was for MCPS to find and alternate lesson for the kids during this time, but if they are to stay home "unexcused"... I'd read same sex books every day.

We know the MoCo attorneys that represent MCPS are notoriously slow learners, but I really doubt even they are going to countenance retaliatory harassment against plaintiffs that just won at SCOTUS.

Reading books is not against the ruling.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:MCPS and the BOE overrreached and they deserved this ruling.

MCPS had no reason to extend and the. Revoke the opt-out. If they had just left their original approach intact, this wouldn’t have gone to the Supreme Court.

Yup, cocky and woke as usual. They won't learn and will spend more of our tax $ on pointless avoidable lawsuits.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Late to the game here. So the main implication is that parents can keep kids home on the days any LGBTQ books are read? I'm a teacher and my worry is that schools will have to figure out a place for kids to be during that particular lesson. But heck yeah, if parents want to keep their kids home, then fine. I'll plan to do same sex family read alouds every Friday and the horrible families can find childcare for 20% of the year. Hope it bankrupts them.

You are a garbage teacher.

No, they're a great teacher, teaching kids that people of various types exist. You're a garbage person.

Why teach kindergarteners and 1st graders about sexual orientation? Do they do sex-ed at that age?

Are you asking why we teach the words mom and a dad in K? or a mom and a mom? or a dad and a dad?