To take some pressure off you if you don’t get into these preschools - if you focus on helping your child stay curious, social emotionally well developed, you still have a decent shot getting into a good private K from unconnected school or even UPK. |
My DC attends a non-feeder preschool, and the school doesn’t prioritize prepping kids for private school. About half the class goes public, but every year, a handful still land spots at great privates—including multiple admits to TT schools.
If your PSD is experienced in the process and committed to helping (e.g., guiding school choices based on your DC’s profile, looping in admissions offices for feedback), that’s often enough. Sometimes it’s even an advantage. You are not competing with half a class of siblings/legacies at the same target schools. The PSD can advocate for your DC without split loyalties, and your kid’s app stands on its own. Not saying it’s easy, but a “non-feeder” label doesn’t have to hold you back. |
Many preschools have child separation class that slowly transitions from the nanny to the preschool setting. I am not sure how many preschools switch from nanny to preschool cold turkey anymore. The entry point seems to have gotten younger. |
I meant prepping for k. I’d never prep for preschool. And I don’t think you need tutors, it can definitely be done by parents at home. |
What is there to even prep for? Based on what these group child evaluations involve, it seems heavily play focused. Maybe the only thing to tell kids is that there will be others, there will be toys, and they will meet some new teachers? |
Can you explain how a preschool would prioritize prepping for private K? Curious because I’m awaiting preschool decisions at the end of the month, and have a feeling we will be accepted into some of the feeder preschools, but the one I liked most was a smaller, non feeder preschool that sounds like the one your DC went to… we also want to target TT K afterward and I just don’t want us to be at a disadvantage |
I do not think the above poster meant that feeder preschools prep for K. I am not aware of any feeder preschool prepping for K or prioritizing “prepping”. My dc went one of the feeder preschools, and there was no prepping. Butwhat it had was PSD who had great relationships with many different schools. There are a lot of communication between PSDs and admissions directors for K. However, not everyone from from a feeder preschool go to TT. For example, if there are 6 kids from your preschool go Spence, I bet out of the 6, there are about 4-5 siblings or legacies. You are competing with legacies, siblings, and donors in your preschool.
With that being said, I agree with the above poster. Just because your dc does not go to a feeder school, does not mean dc can’t get into TT. There are some TTs that avoid having a feeder school. My dc’s K class consisted of several public and preschools that I never heard of. As to prepping for K, I heard from a friend who enrolled her child in a group that “preps” kids for playgroups. She got spooked after seeing another child at the playgroup at one of the TTs. The child extended her hand first for a handshake and said her name to one of the administrators of the playgroup. The child took the initiative. She thought the child was clearly prepped and enrolled her dc with the group. But honestly,I do not think prepping for K is necessary. Just make sure your kids learn how to listen and play well with others. |
Good point. 3 Trinity and 6 each in Brearley/collegiate which happen to be schools with strong sibling policy seems to indicate siblings. Brick also got 3 into Hunter which apparently was more than any other preschool and Hunter has no sibling preference |
Siblings as a knock against a school’s placement is also a little weird. I get legacies. But with siblings, that just means the preschool successfully got the older sibling placed into the school too? Which is a good thing. It’s not like the older sibling gets in to a good kindergarten, then the parents switch the younger child to a different preschool. Or at least is exceedingly rarely the case. |
NP - You are attributing the success to the preschool rather than 1. extremely gifted child, 2. family (donor potential / letter of recommendation), 3. luck (less demand during covid). There is a story in the press on how even Rupert Murdoch worried his child wouldn't be admitted to Brearley from TT preschool. |
Which is really true of every step along the process. Did you get into Harvard because you went to Trinity or because you are smart/connected? Did you get that post-college job at McKinsey/Goldman/Google because you went to Harvard or because you are smart/connected? And so on. I think the reality is a little of both. And the best path is to pick the spot that is the best individual fit that maximizes your chances of learning/growing/being “smart”. Within reason though, meaning the school still needs to be “good enough” reputationally - you still want to be at a feeder, but ranking #1 vs #5 is a little ridiculous |
NP - It comes from the parents and not the preschool. When you start hearing about 4 year olds that can read, you start to worry whether your child is falling behind. Some preschools are play-based learning so the director will tell you not to worry and all childrens will learn to read soon enough in K. You start to feel the need to supplement outside the preschool. |
The poster who said her DC is at TT K and has classmates from non feeder preschools, can you share some of the names of those preschools? |
TTs want smart kids not prepped kids. Beyond being smart there are obviously other qualities that matter. I would focus more on making sure the kid is curious, enjoys learning, has a great personality, communicates well with peer and adults, and can control emotions well. Rather than teaching math or reading early. |
m Agree. Great advice. Let them love learning and it will all fall into place. Have faith in your child and their personality. |